< Back to UCC Document Community

Makayla Shoemaker

UCC search PA - debtor name variations causing missed liens?

Been doing equipment financing for 8 years and recently had a close call that's making me question my UCC search procedures in Pennsylvania. We were about to close on a $180k construction equipment deal when I decided to run one more search variation on the debtor name - good thing I did because there was an existing UCC-1 filed under a slightly different business name format that didn't show up in my initial searches. The debtor had filed their articles of incorporation as 'ABC Construction Services LLC' but the existing lien was filed under 'ABC Construction Services, LLC' (note the comma). Pennsylvania's search logic didn't catch this as a match even though it's clearly the same entity. This got me thinking - how many deals have I closed where there were existing liens that my searches missed due to name variations? The potential liability exposure is keeping me up at night. What search strategies are other lenders using to catch these variations? I've been using the standard SOS portal but wondering if there are better approaches or if I'm missing something obvious in my search methodology.

This is exactly why I always run multiple search variations for every debtor name. Pennsylvania's system is notorious for missing matches on punctuation differences. I typically search the exact name as filed, then without punctuation, then with common abbreviations (LLC vs L.L.C. vs Limited Liability Company). It's tedious but has saved me from several potential problems.

0 coins

Emma Olsen

•

How do you handle names with ampersands vs 'and'? I've seen filings where the same company is listed both ways

0 coins

Always search both - 'Smith & Jones LLC' and 'Smith and Jones LLC'. PA treats these as completely different entities in their search algorithm unfortunately

0 coins

Lucas Lindsey

•

I learned this lesson the hard way last year. Had a $95K machinery loan that turned into a mess when we discovered a prior lien filed under the debtor's trade name instead of their legal entity name. Now I always search both legal name and any DBAs or trade names. PA doesn't automatically cross-reference these like some other states do.

0 coins

That's terrifying. How did you handle the situation? Were you able to work something out with the prior lienholder?

0 coins

Lucas Lindsey

•

We had to subordinate our lien and adjust the loan terms. Cost us about $15K in reduced margin but better than taking a total loss. The prior lender was actually cooperative once we explained the situation.

0 coins

Sophie Duck

•

This is why I never trust just one search method anymore. Started using Certana.ai's document verification tool after a similar issue - you can upload the debtor's charter documents and it cross-checks against UCC filings to catch name inconsistencies. Saved me twice already this year.

0 coins

PA is definitely one of the trickier states for UCC searches. The comma issue you mentioned is super common. I've also seen problems with Inc vs Incorporated, Corp vs Corporation, and even spacing issues. Anyone know if they're planning to upgrade their search functionality?

0 coins

Anita George

•

Been hearing rumors about system improvements for two years now but nothing concrete. Still dealing with the same search limitations

0 coins

The PA Department of State website mentions they're 'evaluating search enhancements' but no timeline given. Classic government non-answer

0 coins

Logan Chiang

•

Your story perfectly illustrates why I now do comprehensive debtor name verification before every filing. I use a systematic approach: exact legal name from articles of incorporation, common abbreviation variations, punctuation variations, and any trade names or DBAs. Takes extra time but the liability protection is worth it.

0 coins

Do you have a checklist or template you follow? I'm thinking of creating something similar for my team

0 coins

Logan Chiang

•

I do have a standardized process document. Happy to share the key points - basically covers entity type variations, punctuation rules, and common filing mistakes to watch for

0 coins

Isla Fischer

•

Would love to see that checklist too if you're willing to share. We've been flying by the seat of our pants on this stuff

0 coins

Had a similar scare in PA last month but with a different twist - the existing UCC-1 was filed under the debtor's former name from before a corporate name change. The amendment filing updating the debtor name was there but filed separately, so my initial search on the current name came up clean. Only caught it when I dug deeper into the corporate history.

0 coins

Ruby Blake

•

This is why I always pull a complete corporate history from the Secretary of State. Name changes, mergers, dissolutions - all of it can affect UCC search results

0 coins

Exactly. The $25 for a detailed entity report is cheap insurance compared to missing a prior lien

0 coins

Pennsylvania's UCC search system drives me crazy. I've started using third-party search services for critical deals because the state portal is just too unreliable for catching name variations. Worth the extra cost for the peace of mind on large transactions.

0 coins

Ella Harper

•

Which service do you use? I've been considering this option but wasn't sure which ones are reliable

0 coins

I use a combination of services depending on the deal size. For document verification specifically, Certana.ai has been really helpful - upload your charter docs and UCC filings and it flags any name inconsistencies automatically

0 coins

PrinceJoe

•

Been looking at similar tools. The manual comparison process is so error-prone when you're doing multiple deals per week

0 coins

This thread is making me paranoid about all my past searches! Is there any way to go back and verify deals you've already closed? I'm worried I might have missed something critical

0 coins

Logan Chiang

•

You can always run new searches on your existing debtors, but keep in mind that new filings might have been made since your original searches. I do periodic re-searches on large outstanding loans

0 coins

Good point about new filings. How often do you typically re-search? Monthly? Quarterly?

0 coins

Owen Devar

•

I don't do regular re-searches unless there's a specific reason to be concerned. The odds of missing something critical are pretty low if you did thorough initial searches

0 coins

Daniel Rivera

•

For what it's worth, I've been doing UCC searches in PA for 15 years and the comma/punctuation issue has been a problem the entire time. The key is building search variations into your standard process rather than relying on the system to be smart about it. Also always search both the exact legal name AND any obvious abbreviations.

0 coins

15 years of dealing with this same issue and they still haven't fixed it? That's incredibly frustrating

0 coins

Daniel Rivera

•

Welcome to government technology! But honestly, once you develop good search habits it becomes second nature. The bigger risk is getting complacent and skipping steps

0 coins

Connor Rupert

•

Just wanted to add that I've found Pennsylvania's customer service to be pretty helpful when you call with specific search questions. They can sometimes run searches from their end that catch things the public portal misses. Not practical for every search but useful for complex situations.

0 coins

That's a great tip! I never thought to call them directly. Do you have a specific number you use?

0 coins

Connor Rupert

•

I call the main UCC division number - (717) 787-1057. They're usually pretty responsive during business hours

0 coins

Molly Hansen

•

Good to know they're helpful. Some states the customer service is completely useless for UCC questions

0 coins

Brady Clean

•

This whole discussion reinforces why I always recommend using automated document verification tools for any deal over $50K. The manual search process is just too error-prone when you're dealing with name variations, corporate changes, and different filing formats. Tools like Certana.ai can catch inconsistencies that human reviewers miss, especially when you're under time pressure to close deals.

0 coins

Skylar Neal

•

What's your experience been with automated tools vs manual searches? Are they really that much more accurate?

0 coins

Brady Clean

•

In my experience, automated tools are much better at catching systematic variations like punctuation differences, but you still need human judgment for things like trade names or corporate family relationships. Best approach is using both together

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today