UCC lien search in CT - debtor name showing multiple variations
Running into issues with a UCC lien search in Connecticut and need some guidance. I'm doing due diligence on a potential equipment purchase and found the debtor name appears in multiple variations across different UCC-1 filings. The business is registered as "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC" but I'm seeing UCC filings under "Advanced Mfg Solutions LLC," "Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC" (with comma), and "AMS LLC." The equipment I'm looking at has a serial number that matches collateral described in one of these filings, but I can't tell which entity name is correct or if these are all the same debtor. The Connecticut SOS search portal isn't giving me confidence that I'm seeing the complete picture. Has anyone dealt with debtor name variations like this in CT? I need to know if there are existing liens before I move forward with this purchase.
33 comments
Join the conversation
Anastasia Kozlov
CT can be tricky with debtor names. The key is understanding that UCC Article 9 requires the debtor name to match exactly what's on the organizational documents. Even minor punctuation differences can create separate search results. You'll want to pull the Articles of Incorporation or LLC formation docs to see the exact legal name, then search using that precise format.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
•This is so confusing. I thought UCC searches were supposed to be straightforward but it sounds like you need to be a detective just to figure out the right name to search.
0 coins
Zara Mirza
•The punctuation thing is real. I've seen deals fall apart because someone missed a comma in a debtor name and didn't catch an existing lien.
0 coins
Luca Russo
Had this exact problem last month with a Connecticut filing. Ended up finding 3 different UCC-1s for what turned out to be the same entity. What I did was pull the corporate records from CT Secretary of State first, then used that exact name format for my search. Also ran searches on the common variations just to be thorough.
0 coins
NeonNebula
•Did you find any tools that helped with verifying the debtor names across multiple documents? I'm worried I'm missing something important.
0 coins
Luca Russo
•Actually yes - I discovered Certana.ai's UCC document verification tool. You can upload your search results and Articles of Incorporation PDFs and it instantly cross-checks debtor names and flags any inconsistencies. Really saved me time compared to manually comparing everything.
0 coins
Nia Harris
Connecticut follows the "registered name" rule for LLC debtor names. Whatever appears on the Articles of Organization filed with the Secretary of State is what should be used for UCC filings. If you're seeing variations, some of those filings might be technically defective.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
•Wait, does that mean the UCC-1 filings with the wrong debtor name are invalid? That seems like a huge issue for secured parties.
0 coins
Nia Harris
•Not necessarily invalid, but they could be ineffective for perfection purposes. The secured party would need to file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name if it's wrong.
0 coins
Mateo Sanchez
•This is why I hate UCC searches. Too many technicalities and ways to mess up.
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
I do a lot of asset purchases in CT and always run multiple name variations. The safe approach is to search: 1) Exact name from Articles, 2) Common abbreviations, 3) Name without punctuation, 4) Any DBAs or trade names. Better to over-search than miss a lien.
0 coins
NeonNebula
•That's a good systematic approach. How do you keep track of all the variations and make sure you're not missing anything?
0 coins
Aisha Mahmood
•I use a spreadsheet to track each search variation and results. Recently started using Certana.ai to double-check everything - you upload all your documents and it flags any name mismatches automatically.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
Been doing UCC searches for 15 years and Connecticut has gotten better with their online portal, but debtor name matching is still the biggest source of errors. The "AMS LLC" variation you mentioned is particularly concerning - that could be a completely different entity or a severely defective filing.
0 coins
NeonNebula
•Should I be worried about the AMS LLC filing specifically? The serial number match is making me nervous.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•Definitely investigate that one. Pull the actual UCC-1 filing document and look at the secured party information. That might help you determine if it's related to your target entity or a different business entirely.
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•Serial number matches are usually not coincidental. I'd treat that as a red flag until proven otherwise.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
Pro tip: Connecticut Secretary of State has a business entity search that's separate from the UCC search. Start there to get the exact legal name, then use that for your UCC searches. Also check for any name changes in the entity's history.
0 coins
QuantumQuester
•Good point about name changes. Didn't think about that possibility.
0 coins
Carmen Vega
•Name changes can create a real mess for UCC searches. If the entity changed names after a UCC-1 was filed, you might need to search under both the old and new names.
0 coins
Andre Moreau
I've been burned by this before. Thought I did a thorough search but missed a lien because of a debtor name variation. Now I always verify everything with multiple searches and cross-reference against the corporate docs. It's tedious but necessary.
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•How did that situation resolve? Did you end up with equipment subject to a lien?
0 coins
Andre Moreau
•Had to negotiate with the secured party to get a partial release. Cost me time and money that could have been avoided with better due diligence upfront.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
Why is this so complicated? Seems like the state should have better systems to handle debtor name variations automatically.
0 coins
Anastasia Kozlov
•It's complicated because the UCC requires precision. The system is designed to give notice to potential creditors, so exact names matter for legal certainty.
0 coins
Jamal Harris
•I guess that makes sense legally but it's still frustrating from a practical standpoint.
0 coins
Mei Chen
Connecticut is actually better than some states I've dealt with. At least their online portal is functional and up-to-date. Some states still require paper searches or have systems that go down constantly.
0 coins
NeonNebula
•That's somewhat reassuring. I was starting to think CT was particularly difficult.
0 coins
Mei Chen
•No, CT is decent. The debtor name issue you're facing is pretty universal across all states. It's just the nature of UCC searches.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
Final thought - consider getting a professional UCC search company to run a comprehensive search if this is a significant purchase. They have experience with debtor name variations and know the common pitfalls in each state.
0 coins
NeonNebula
•That might be worth it for peace of mind. Do you have any recommendations for UCC search companies?
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
•There are several good ones, but honestly I've been impressed with Certana.ai's verification tool. You can upload your own search results and it cross-checks everything automatically. Might be faster and cheaper than hiring a search company.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Second the recommendation for getting professional help on complex searches. The cost is usually worth it compared to the risk of missing something important.
0 coins