< Back to UCC Document Community

Ethan Moore

UCC incidental damages clause in security agreement - what counts?

Equipment lease defaulted last month and I'm trying to figure out what we can actually recover under our UCC security agreement. The collateral (construction equipment) was repossessed but we're looking at substantial incidental damages from the default. Our security agreement mentions incidental damages but doesn't spell out specifics. What typically qualifies as recoverable incidental damages under UCC Article 9? We've got storage costs, legal fees for the repo, transportation to auction, and some equipment prep costs. Also dealing with lost rent during the repo process. Some of these seem obvious but want to make sure we're not missing anything or including stuff that won't hold up. Anyone dealt with similar UCC incidental damages recovery recently?

UCC 9-615 covers this pretty clearly. Incidental damages typically include reasonable expenses for taking, holding, preparing for disposition, processing, and disposing of collateral. Your storage, transport, and prep costs should be covered. Legal fees might be trickier depending on your agreement language.

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

Right, and don't forget about advertising costs for the sale and any reasonable attorney fees if your security agreement specifically provides for them.

0 coins

What about the lost rent though? That sounds more like consequential damages which are usually not recoverable unless specifically agreed to.

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

Been through this nightmare before. The key is documentation - keep every receipt and invoice related to the repo and disposition. Insurance during storage, security for the equipment, even reasonable travel expenses for inspections can qualify as incidental damages under UCC.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

Totally agree on documentation. We learned this the hard way when we couldn't recover costs we didn't properly document.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

How detailed do the records need to be? Like do you need separate line items for everything?

0 coins

Andre Moreau

•

Yes, itemize everything. General 'repo costs' won't fly in court. Break down transport, storage per day, prep work, etc.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Lost rent during repo is probably not going to qualify as incidental damages. That's more like lost profits or consequential damages which UCC generally doesn't allow unless your security agreement has specific language about it.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

Agreed. Incidental damages are about the costs of dealing with the collateral itself, not business losses from not having it.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

But what if the delay in repo was caused by debtor interference? Wouldn't additional storage costs during that period still be incidental?

0 coins

Just went through something similar and used Certana.ai to cross-check our security agreement language against the UCC requirements. Their document checker caught some issues with how we were calculating recoverable costs. Really helpful for making sure your agreement actually supports the damages you're trying to recover.

0 coins

Interesting, how does that work exactly? Do you just upload your security agreement?

0 coins

Yeah, you upload your security agreement and it analyzes the language against UCC standards. Shows you what damage types are actually covered and flags potential issues.

0 coins

Don't forget about reasonable costs for environmental compliance if you're dealing with equipment that has fuel or fluids. Had to drain and dispose of hydraulic fluid and that was definitely recoverable as incidental.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Good point. Environmental prep costs are often overlooked but totally legitimate under UCC 9-615.

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

•

What about costs to get the equipment running again if it was damaged during default? Like repair costs before sale?

0 coins

That gets tricky. Minor repairs to make it marketable yes, but major overhauls might not be reasonable.

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

•

Attorney fees are only recoverable if your security agreement specifically provides for them AND they're reasonable. Don't assume they're automatically included in incidental damages. Some courts are pretty strict about this.

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

What's considered 'reasonable' for attorney fees in UCC cases?

0 coins

Dmitry Volkov

•

Depends on complexity and local rates. Simple repo might be a few hours of attorney time. Contested matters obviously more.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

Watch out for double-counting expenses. If you're claiming storage costs as incidental damages, don't also try to include them in your deficiency calculation. Courts don't like that.

0 coins

Miguel Ortiz

•

Can you explain that more? How would storage costs factor into deficiency?

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

If storage costs reduce the sale price, they might already be reflected in your deficiency amount. Don't claim them twice.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

Insurance premiums while holding the collateral are definitely incidental damages. We recovered several months of coverage costs when debtor kept fighting the repo.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Makes sense. You have to protect the collateral while it's in your possession.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

What if the collateral was already insured under debtor's policy? Can you still recover your insurance costs?

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

If debtor's insurance lapsed or didn't cover repo situations, then yes. You needed protection during the process.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

Been doing UCC work for 15 years and the key is that incidental damages must be 'reasonable' and directly related to the disposition of collateral. Courts scrutinize these claims pretty carefully so don't pad them.

0 coins

What's the biggest mistake you see people make with incidental damage claims?

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

Including general business expenses that aren't specifically tied to handling the collateral. Like claiming office overhead or management time for routine tasks.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Also used Certana.ai for UCC document review and it helped identify which provisions in our security agreement actually supported our damage claims. Saved us from making claims we couldn't back up legally.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

That sounds really useful for avoiding frivolous claims that just waste time in court.

0 coins

Oliver Schulz

•

How quickly does it analyze the documents? Is it instant or does it take time?

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Pretty much instant once you upload the PDFs. Gets the analysis back in minutes.

0 coins

One thing to remember - incidental damages under UCC are limited to reasonable expenses. If you spent $5000 to recover $3000 in collateral value, a court might question the reasonableness of your expenses.

0 coins

That's a really good point. You can't spend unlimited money just because you're entitled to incidental damages.

0 coins

So do you have to prove the expenses were cost-effective compared to the collateral value?

0 coins

Not necessarily cost-effective, but reasonable under the circumstances. Context matters a lot.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Thanks everyone for the detailed responses. Sounds like our storage, transport, and prep costs should be solid. Will definitely document everything carefully and probably skip trying to recover the lost rent. The Certana.ai suggestion is interesting - might be worth checking our security agreement language to make sure we're covered.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Smart approach. Better to be conservative and recover what you can than to overreach and get nothing.

0 coins

Good luck with the recovery. Hope you documented everything properly from the start.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Yeah we kept pretty good records thankfully. This discussion has been really helpful for understanding what we can actually claim.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today