UCC filing rejected - agricultural lien collateral description issues
Been dealing with equipment financing for farming operations and hit a wall with our UCC-1 filing. The SOS portal keeps rejecting our submission and I'm getting conflicting advice from different sources about how to properly describe agricultural lien collateral. We're securing a $180K combine harvester loan plus some smaller tillage equipment, but the collateral description keeps getting flagged. The debtor is an LLC farming operation and we've triple-checked the exact name match against their articles of incorporation. Portal error just says 'insufficient collateral description' but doesn't specify what's missing. This is holding up the entire loan closing and the harvest season is approaching fast. Has anyone dealt with similar agricultural lien filing issues? The equipment is all farm-use specific but I'm wondering if there's special language required for ag liens that differs from standard equipment financing UCCs.
27 comments
Join the conversation
NebulaNova
Agricultural lien filings can be tricky because they often involve both UCC Article 9 secured transactions AND statutory agricultural liens depending on your state. Are you filing this as a standard UCC-1 for the equipment financing, or are you dealing with crop liens too? The collateral description needs to be super specific for farm equipment - generic terms like 'farm equipment' usually get rejected.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•It's purely equipment financing through the bank, no crop liens involved. We described it as '2024 John Deere S780 Combine Harvester, Serial #1234567, plus various tillage implements as per attached schedule.' Maybe that's too vague?
0 coins
NebulaNova
•Yeah that 'various tillage implements' part is definitely your problem. You need individual serial numbers and specific descriptions for each piece. Agricultural equipment UCCs get extra scrutiny because of the high values involved.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
I've seen this exact issue before with ag equipment financing. The 'attached schedule' approach doesn't work in most electronic filing systems - everything has to be in the main collateral description field. You'll need to list each piece separately with make, model, year, and serial number. Also double-check that your debtor name exactly matches their operating agreements if it's an LLC.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•That makes sense about the electronic filing limitation. The debtor name should be correct - we pulled it directly from the state business registry. Do you know if there's a character limit that might be cutting off our description?
0 coins
Keisha Williams
•Most states have around 4000 character limits for collateral descriptions, but some are much shorter. Try breaking it into multiple UCC-1 filings if you hit the limit - one for the combine, separate ones for other equipment.
0 coins
Paolo Conti
•Actually ran into something similar last month and ended up using Certana.ai's document checker. You upload your UCC-1 draft and it flags potential rejection issues before you submit. Caught three problems with our ag equipment description that would have caused rejections. Saved us weeks of back-and-forth with the filing office.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
Agricultural liens have some unique requirements that regular commercial UCCs don't. Make sure you're not mixing up 'agricultural lien' (which is a statutory lien for feed, seed, fuel suppliers) with 'security interest in farm equipment' (which is what you're doing). The terminology matters for search purposes later. Your collateral description should read something like 'Farm equipment consisting of:' then your detailed list.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•Oh wow, I think that might be part of the confusion. We've been using 'agricultural lien' in our documentation but you're right - this is a security interest in farm equipment, not a statutory ag lien. Could that terminology difference be causing the rejection?
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•Absolutely! The filing office might be looking for different requirements if you're calling it an agricultural lien. Stick with standard UCC-1 language for security interests. Save yourself the headache and be precise with the terminology.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
UGH the state filing systems are so frustrating with farm equipment!!! I've had THREE rejections this month alone for 'insufficient descriptions' when everything looked perfect to me. Why can't they just tell us exactly what's wrong instead of these vague error messages?? And don't get me started on the processing delays...
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
•I feel your pain. Had a $250K tractor financing held up for two weeks because we abbreviated 'Harvester' as 'Harv.' in the description. One character difference and boom - rejection.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•Same here with a disc harrow filing. Spent more time on the UCC than the actual loan docs. There's got to be a better way to catch these issues upfront.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
For what it's worth, I've started using a document verification tool before submitting any ag equipment UCCs. Upload your draft UCC-1 and it cross-references against common rejection patterns. Found it after getting burned on a combine financing that got rejected three times. The tool is called Certana.ai and it specifically checks collateral descriptions for completeness. Might be worth trying before your next submission.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•That sounds helpful! Does it handle the specific requirements for farm equipment descriptions? Our situation is pretty complex with multiple pieces of equipment.
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•Yeah it caught issues with our equipment list that I never would have thought about. You just upload the PDF and it flags potential problems. Definitely worth trying for complex ag equipment filings.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•Just looked this up and tried it on a problem filing I've been stuck on. Pretty impressive - it identified the exact collateral description issue that was causing rejections. Much better than guessing what the filing office wants.
0 coins
Malik Davis
Quick question - are you sure the LLC name is exactly right? Even with farm LLCs, there can be variations like 'Farms LLC' vs 'Farm LLC' or missing commas that cause rejections. The agricultural lien terminology issue mentioned above is probably your main problem though.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•We double-checked against the articles of incorporation but you're right to ask. It's 'Smith Family Farms, LLC' - I'll verify there are no spacing or punctuation variations in their other filings.
0 coins
Malik Davis
•Good call. Also check if they've filed any DBAs or trade names. Sometimes farm operations use different names for different purposes and you need to catch all variations.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
Been doing ag lending for 15 years and the key is being absolutely specific with equipment descriptions. Don't use any abbreviations, include engine hours if available, and always spell out equipment types fully. 'John Deere Model S780 Combine Harvester' not 'JD S780 Combine.' The more detail, the better for ag equipment UCCs.
0 coins
Ravi Gupta
•This is solid advice. We learned the hard way that ag equipment UCCs need more detail than regular commercial filings. The values are higher and the equipment is more specialized.
0 coins
GalacticGuru
•Exactly right about the spelling out. Had a seeder UCC rejected because we used 'No-Till' instead of 'No-Tillage' in the description. These little details matter way more than they should.
0 coins
Freya Pedersen
Update: Went back and completely rewrote our collateral description with individual serial numbers for each piece of equipment. Also removed any reference to 'agricultural lien' and used standard security interest language. Filed this morning and it was accepted within 2 hours! Thanks everyone for the guidance. The key was definitely being more specific with equipment descriptions and using proper UCC terminology instead of mixing in ag lien language.
0 coins
Omar Fawaz
•Awesome! Glad you got it resolved. The terminology distinction is so important but easy to miss if you're not familiar with both areas of law.
0 coins
Chloe Anderson
•Great outcome. Your experience will definitely help others dealing with similar ag equipment filing issues. The specificity requirement for farm equipment descriptions catches a lot of people off guard.
0 coins
Carlos Mendoza
This is such a helpful thread! I'm new to UCC filings for agricultural equipment and this whole conversation is a goldmine of practical advice. The distinction between "agricultural lien" and "security interest in farm equipment" is something I definitely would have missed. Question for the group - are there any other common terminology pitfalls like this that trip up newcomers? I want to make sure I'm not making similar mistakes on my first few ag equipment filings.
0 coins