< Back to UCC Document Community

Connor Murphy

UCC Safe Harbor Protection Lost Due to Debtor Name Change - Need Filing Strategy

Running into a nightmare scenario with our UCC-1 filings and safe harbor protection. We have a portfolio of equipment loans where the borrower legally changed their business name 8 months ago, but we only discovered this last week during our annual lien audit. Original UCC-1 was filed under the old entity name and we've been operating under the assumption we had safe harbor protection this whole time. Our continuation is due in 6 months but now I'm worried we've lost our perfected security interest entirely. The name change wasn't just a DBA - it was a full legal entity restructure that went through the Secretary of State. Has anyone dealt with this type of safe harbor issue before? We're talking about $2.3M in collateral that might be at risk. Should we be filing new UCC-1s immediately or can we salvage this with amendments? The borrower has been making payments normally and had no idea this would affect our security position.

Yara Haddad

•

This is exactly why I do quarterly debtor name searches instead of just relying on safe harbor. The 4-month rule is brutal - if the name change made your original filing seriously misleading, you might have lost perfection 4 months after the change occurred. Since you said it happened 8 months ago, you could be looking at 4 months of unperfected status. What state are you in? Some states are more forgiving than others on the "seriously misleading" standard.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

We're in Texas. The entity went from "ABC Manufacturing LLC" to "ABC Advanced Systems LLC" so it's not a complete name change but definitely different enough that a search under the new name wouldn't find our original filing.

0 coins

Texas follows the standard Article 9 seriously misleading test. That name change would probably fail a debtor name search so you likely lost perfection 4 months after the change. You need new UCC-1s filed immediately under the correct name.

0 coins

Yara Haddad

•

Agreed with the Texas analysis. The good news is you can still perfect going forward, but you'll have a gap period where you were unperfected. Document everything about when you discovered the change and file new UCC-1s ASAP.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Had a similar situation last year with a client who did a merger and we missed it for 6 months. Lost safe harbor protection completely. The key question is whether any other creditors filed during your unperfected period. You should run a full UCC search on both the old and new entity names to see what else is out there. Also check for any bankruptcy filings or other liens that might have attached during the gap.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

That's terrifying. How do you even search for creditors who might have filed during the gap period? I'm not sure what the exact date of the name change was - only that it happened around 8 months ago.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

You need to get the exact date from the Secretary of State filing records. Then run UCC searches for 30 days before and after that date to see if anyone else filed. Also search judgment records and federal tax liens.

0 coins

Amina Sow

•

Before you panic completely, what does your loan agreement say about the borrower's obligation to notify you of name changes? You might have breach of contract claims even if you lost your security interest. Also, some courts have been more lenient on the safe harbor rules when the debtor concealed the name change from the secured party.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

The loan docs do require notification of any name changes within 30 days. The borrower claims they "thought it was just a technical filing" and didn't realize it would affect our UCC. Not sure if that helps our position legally though.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

That notification requirement in your loan docs is huge. You have a clear breach of contract claim and might be able to argue the debtor should be estopped from claiming you lost perfection due to their own breach.

0 coins

Amina Sow

•

The estoppel argument is worth pursuing but don't count on it. Courts are split on whether debtor misconduct can save a secured party's perfection. File new UCC-1s immediately regardless of what legal theories you want to pursue.

0 coins

Oliver Wagner

•

This is why I started using Certana.ai for all our UCC document verification. You can upload your original UCC-1 and the debtor's current charter documents and it instantly flags any name mismatches. Would have caught this issue months ago. The system cross-references everything automatically and alerts you to potential safe harbor problems before they become disasters.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Never heard of that service but sounds like exactly what we need going forward. Does it work with existing filings or just new ones?

0 coins

Oliver Wagner

•

Works with any UCC documents - just upload PDFs and it does the comparison. I use it for our quarterly compliance checks now. Would definitely have flagged your debtor name issue before you lost safe harbor protection.

0 coins

Sounds useful but the horse has already left the barn for this situation. The immediate issue is whether to file new UCC-1s or try to fix this with amendments.

0 coins

You cannot fix this with a UCC-3 amendment. Once you've lost perfection due to the safe harbor rule, an amendment to the original filing won't restore it. You need brand new UCC-1 filings under the correct debtor name. Think of it as starting over with a new security interest, not fixing an old one.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

So we're looking at a completely new UCC-1 with a new file number? What about our original filing date for priority purposes?

0 coins

Correct - new UCC-1, new file number, new filing date. Your priority will be based on the new filing date, not the original one. That's why the gap period is so dangerous if other creditors filed during that time.

0 coins

This is exactly right. The safe harbor rule is unforgiving - once you lose perfection, you can't retroactively fix it. The new UCC-1 will only protect you going forward from the new filing date.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Have you considered whether this was actually a name change or if the borrower created a new entity entirely? If it's a new legal entity, you might have bigger problems than just UCC perfection. The loan might not even be enforceable against the new entity without proper assumption documentation.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

The Secretary of State records show it as an amendment to the original LLC filing, not a new entity formation. Same EIN number too. So I think it's just a name change, not a new entity.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

That's good news at least. Same entity means your loan is still enforceable, you just have the UCC perfection issue to deal with. Still file new UCC-1s immediately though.

0 coins

Emma Thompson

•

$2.3M in collateral and you're just discovering this now? This is why everyone needs systematic debtor monitoring. I run monthly searches on all our borrowers specifically to catch these issues. The safe harbor protection is worthless if you're not actively monitoring for changes that could invalidate it.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Easy to say in hindsight. We do annual audits but clearly that's not frequent enough. How do you manage monthly searches for hundreds of borrowers?

0 coins

Emma Thompson

•

Automated services. Set up monthly alerts through your UCC search provider. Costs a few hundred a month but saves situations like this. Your compliance team should be all over this.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Monthly seems excessive for most portfolios. Quarterly is usually sufficient unless you're dealing with high-risk borrowers or volatile industries.

0 coins

The real question is what other lenders or creditors might have filed during your unperfected period. If it's just trade creditors with unsecured claims, you're probably fine. But if another bank filed a UCC-1 during those 4 months when you were unperfected, they could have priority over your new filing.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

How would I even find that out? The UCC search under the old name obviously shows our original filing, but searching the new name might not show everything if other creditors also missed the name change.

0 coins

You need to search both names for the entire period from the name change date forward. Also search the borrower's federal tax ID number if your state allows that. Some creditors might have filed correctly under the new name.

0 coins

Just went through something similar with a client. Their debtor did a merger and we missed it for 5 months. Filed new UCC-1s immediately and also amended our loan agreement to tighten up the notification requirements. Added language requiring 15-day advance notice of any entity changes, not just 30-day after-the-fact notice.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

That's smart. What other loan covenant changes did you make to prevent this in the future?

0 coins

Required borrower to provide updated organizational documents annually and give us access to their registered agent for service of process. Also added a specific representation that no entity changes have occurred since the last compliance certificate.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Look, everyone's giving you the technical analysis but the bottom line is simple: file new UCC-1s TODAY under the correct debtor name. Don't wait for legal opinions or priority searches. Every day you delay is another day someone else could file ahead of you. You can sort out the legal implications later but get your new filings on record immediately.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

You're absolutely right. I'm getting caught up in the analysis when I should be taking action. Filing new UCC-1s first thing Monday morning.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Smart move. Document everything about when you discovered the issue and when you filed the new UCC-1s. That timeline could be important if you end up in a priority dispute with another creditor.

0 coins

Oliver Wagner

•

And seriously consider using something like Certana.ai going forward to catch these issues before they become problems. Upload your UCC docs and borrower charters quarterly and it'll flag any mismatches automatically.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

The safe harbor rule exists for a reason - to give secured parties certainty about their perfection status. But that certainty comes with the responsibility to monitor your debtors. Hard lesson learned but at least you caught it before a bankruptcy or other crisis. File the new UCC-1s and implement better monitoring going forward.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Definitely implementing quarterly checks instead of annual ones. This was too close for comfort and we got lucky there wasn't a bankruptcy filing during the gap period.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

Quarterly is good but consider event-driven monitoring too. Any time you get a payment from a slightly different entity name or see changes in their marketing materials, that should trigger a compliance check.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today