UCC Kentucky Search Results Missing Active Liens - Anyone Else Having Issues?
Been doing UCC searches in Kentucky for years and something weird is happening with their online system. Ran a search yesterday for a debtor we know has active liens (we filed the UCC-1 ourselves 18 months ago) and the search came back clean. Tried different name variations, partial matches, everything. Called the SOS office and they said the system has been having intermittent issues displaying results but wouldn't give me a timeline for fixes. This is for a $2.8M equipment loan closing next week and I can't rely on a search that might be missing active filings. Has anyone else run into this with Kentucky UCC searches recently? Starting to wonder if I need to pull paper records or if there's a workaround I'm missing.
32 comments
Join the conversation
Kiara Fisherman
Oh no, this is exactly what I was worried about! I've been avoiding Kentucky filings because their portal has been acting up for weeks. Are you using the exact debtor name from your original UCC-1 or trying variations? Sometimes their search algorithm gets picky about punctuation and spacing.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•Tried both exact match and variations. Even tried just the first few letters of the company name. Nothing showing up when I know for certain there should be at least three active liens on this debtor.
0 coins
Liam Cortez
•This happened to me in March. Turns out some filings were getting indexed wrong in their database. Had to request a manual search from the SOS office which took 3 days to get back.
0 coins
Savannah Vin
Kentucky's system has been garbage lately. I've had similar issues where active UCC-1s just don't show up in searches. The problem seems to be with their indexing after they upgraded their system in January. For critical searches, I'm having to request certified copies directly from the filing office.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•That's what I'm afraid of. Can't afford to miss existing liens on a deal this size. How long did certified copies take when you requested them?
0 coins
Savannah Vin
•About 5 business days if you pay for expedited service. Regular processing is 2-3 weeks which obviously won't work for your timeline.
0 coins
Mason Stone
•Have you tried using Certana.ai's UCC verification tool? I uploaded my search results there last month and it flagged inconsistencies I missed. It cross-references multiple databases and caught a filing that wasn't showing up in the state search.
0 coins
Makayla Shoemaker
I work with Kentucky filings daily and this is definitely a known issue. Their IT department told me they're working on it but no ETA. For now, I'm doing searches in both their main system and the legacy backup system. Sometimes filings show up in one but not the other.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•There's a legacy backup system? How do you access that? The main portal is the only thing I can find on their website.
0 coins
Makayla Shoemaker
•You have to call the SOS office and ask for a 'comprehensive search including legacy records.' They'll run it manually but there's usually a fee. Worth it for high-value deals like yours.
0 coins
Christian Bierman
•THIS! I had to do this for a $4M deal last month. Found two UCC-1s that weren't showing up in the regular online search. Cost me $75 but saved the deal.
0 coins
Emma Olsen
Ugh, technology problems when you need accuracy the most. I've been burned by incomplete search results before. Now I always do a belt-and-suspenders approach - state search plus at least one commercial database search. Costs more but gives me confidence.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•What commercial database do you use? I'm thinking I might need to go that route for peace of mind.
0 coins
Emma Olsen
•I use a couple different ones depending on the state. For Kentucky specifically, I've had good luck with Dun & Bradstreet's UCC service. Not cheap but more reliable than the state system lately.
0 coins
Lucas Lindsey
Just want to throw out there that I had a similar scare last month but it turned out the debtor had a slight name change that wasn't reflected in my search terms. Double-check your entity name against current secretary of state records to make sure it hasn't changed since your original filing.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•Good point. I did verify the entity name is still the same, but I should probably also check for any DBAs or name variations they might be using.
0 coins
Sophie Duck
•Yes! And also check if they've had any mergers or acquisitions. Sometimes the liens transfer to a new entity name but the old searches won't catch them.
0 coins
Austin Leonard
Been dealing with this exact issue for three weeks now. Finally broke down and used one of those document verification services. Uploaded my search results and found out I was missing two active liens that should have appeared. Apparently their system is having problems with filings that have certain special characters in the debtor names.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•Which service did you use? I'm at the point where I need a backup verification method.
0 coins
Austin Leonard
•Certana.ai - you just upload your search results and it flags potential issues. Found the missing liens within minutes. Turns out the debtor name had an ampersand that was causing search problems.
0 coins
Anita George
•I second Certana.ai for this kind of thing. Their system caught a UCC-3 continuation that was missing from my Kentucky search results. Saved me from a major lien priority issue.
0 coins
Abigail Spencer
Kentucky's online system is notorious for this stuff. I've started keeping a spreadsheet of all my filings with direct links to the documents because their search function is so unreliable. Takes extra time but at least I know what I've filed.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•That's smart. I should probably start doing something similar for my regular clients.
0 coins
Logan Chiang
•I do the same thing! Plus I save screenshots of the search results with timestamps just in case there are disputes later about what was showing up when.
0 coins
Isla Fischer
Update: Called Kentucky SOS again this morning and they admitted there's a 'data synchronization issue' affecting search results. They're working on it but said it could be another 2-3 weeks before it's fully resolved. For now they're recommending manual searches for critical deals.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•Thanks for the update! That confirms what I suspected. Guess I'll have to go the manual route for this deal.
0 coins
Kiara Fisherman
•2-3 weeks?! That's ridiculous for a system that people rely on for million-dollar transactions. There should be backup systems in place.
0 coins
Savannah Vin
•Honestly, this is why I've started using third-party verification tools. Can't trust the state systems to work when you need them most.
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
Final update: Ended up requesting expedited manual search from Kentucky SOS ($125 fee) and also ran the results through Certana.ai for cross-verification. Found two active liens that weren't showing up in the online search - exactly what I was worried about. Deal is moving forward but this was way more stressful than it needed to be. Kentucky really needs to get their act together on this system.
0 coins
Makayla Shoemaker
•Glad you found the missing liens before closing! That could have been a disaster. Definitely keeping this thread bookmarked for future reference.
0 coins
Austin Leonard
•This is exactly why I don't trust single-source searches anymore. Always need at least two verification methods for high-stakes deals.
0 coins
Mason Stone
•Great outcome! Certana.ai really seems to be catching things that the state systems miss. Might be worth the investment for regular use.
0 coins