UCC Filing Issues with International Collateral - Need Help with Secured Transaction
Running into complications with a UCC-1 filing where the collateral involves international equipment. The debtor operates manufacturing facilities both domestically and overseas, and I'm uncertain about how to properly describe the collateral when some of it crosses borders. The SOS portal keeps rejecting our filing, and I suspect it's related to how we're categorizing the secured assets. Has anyone dealt with UCC filings where the collateral description needs to account for equipment that might be moved between countries? The loan is substantial and we can't afford to have an imperfect lien. Any guidance on the proper approach for international collateral in UCC-1 filings would be appreciated.
38 comments
Join the conversation
Jackie Martinez
International collateral can be tricky with UCC filings. The key is understanding that the UCC-1 perfects your interest in the jurisdiction where you file, but if the collateral moves to another country, you might need additional filings there. What specific type of equipment are we talking about? Manufacturing equipment that's permanently installed would be treated differently than mobile equipment.
0 coins
Monique Byrd
•It's primarily heavy manufacturing equipment - some of it is bolted down permanently, but other pieces are designed to be moved between facilities as production demands change. The debtor has facilities in three countries.
0 coins
Lia Quinn
•For mobile equipment crossing borders, you definitely need to consider the jurisdiction where the equipment will be located. The UCC-1 filing in the debtor's jurisdiction of organization is your starting point, but you may need additional filings.
0 coins
Haley Stokes
I've seen this exact situation cause headaches before. The collateral description is crucial - you need to be specific enough to identify the equipment but broad enough to cover movements. Something like 'all manufacturing equipment now owned or hereafter acquired, wherever located' might work, but check with your attorney on the specific language.
0 coins
Asher Levin
•That's way too broad and could cause problems. You need to be more specific about the equipment types and models, especially for international transactions.
0 coins
Haley Stokes
•Fair point, but overly specific descriptions can also backfire if the equipment gets upgraded or replaced. There's a balance to strike.
0 coins
Serene Snow
•We recently had a similar issue and ended up using Certana.ai to verify our UCC-1 documents before filing. Their system caught inconsistencies between our loan agreement and the UCC filing that would have caused problems later. You can upload your documents and it cross-checks everything automatically.
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
What state are you filing in? Some states have specific requirements for international collateral descriptions that others don't. Also, have you considered whether any of this equipment qualifies as fixtures? That could complicate things further.
0 coins
Monique Byrd
•Filing in Delaware since that's where the debtor is incorporated. Some of the equipment is definitely fixture-type installations, but the mobile equipment is what's causing the description issues.
0 coins
Romeo Barrett
•Delaware's pretty standard, but fixture filings are a whole different animal. You might need separate UCC-1 fixture filings for the permanently installed equipment.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
This is giving me flashbacks to my own international collateral nightmare. Spent weeks going back and forth with the SOS office over collateral descriptions. The rejection notices weren't even clear about what was wrong!
0 coins
Justin Trejo
•Same here! The portal error messages are useless. 'Invalid collateral description' doesn't tell you anything useful.
0 coins
Alana Willis
•Have you tried calling the SOS office directly? Sometimes they can give you specific guidance on what's causing the rejection.
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
For international transactions, you absolutely need to coordinate with local counsel in each jurisdiction where the collateral might be located. The UCC filing is just one piece of the puzzle. Each country has different requirements for perfecting security interests.
0 coins
Sara Unger
•This is the correct answer. Don't try to solve international secured transactions with just a UCC filing.
0 coins
Butch Sledgehammer
•Agreed, but the UCC-1 still needs to be done correctly as the foundation. Getting that wrong can invalidate everything else.
0 coins
Freya Ross
I'd recommend being very specific in your collateral description and including serial numbers where possible. For the mobile equipment, you might want to describe it as 'equipment described in Schedule A attached hereto' and then attach a detailed schedule.
0 coins
Leslie Parker
•Schedules can work but they add complexity. Make sure the schedule is properly incorporated into the UCC-1 filing.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•We used Certana.ai's document checker when we had schedule issues with a UCC filing. It verified that our schedule references matched the main filing perfectly - caught a discrepancy that would have been a problem.
0 coins
Savanna Franklin
Don't forget about continuation requirements if this is a long-term loan. International collateral often involves longer loan terms, and you don't want your UCC-1 to lapse while equipment is overseas.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
•Good point about continuations. Set up calendar reminders now for the 5-year mark.
0 coins
Amy Fleming
•Even better, set up reminders for 4.5 years out. Gives you time to handle any issues that come up.
0 coins
Alice Pierce
Has anyone mentioned that you might need to consider the debtor's principal place of business vs. jurisdiction of organization? If the debtor's main operations are international, that could affect where you file.
0 coins
Esteban Tate
•For entities, it's jurisdiction of organization that matters for UCC-1 filing location, not principal place of business.
0 coins
Ivanna St. Pierre
•Right, but the collateral location still matters for perfection priority if there's a conflict.
0 coins
Elin Robinson
I went through something similar last year. Ended up having to file amendments three times before getting it right. The key was being extremely specific about which equipment was permanently installed vs. mobile. Also had to coordinate with international counsel for filings in the other countries.
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
•Three amendments? That must have been expensive and time-consuming.
0 coins
Elin Robinson
•It was, but better than having an invalid security interest. The client understood after we explained the risks.
0 coins
Beth Ford
•I wish I'd known about tools like Certana.ai back then. Being able to upload all the documents and verify consistency would have saved me those amendment filings.
0 coins
Morita Montoya
Make sure your collateral description doesn't conflict with any existing liens or security interests. International equipment often has complex ownership structures that can create conflicts.
0 coins
Kingston Bellamy
•Definitely run UCC searches in all relevant jurisdictions before finalizing your filing.
0 coins
Joy Olmedo
•And don't forget to search under all possible debtor name variations. International entities often have multiple legal names.
0 coins
Isaiah Cross
Update: Finally got our filing accepted! The issue was indeed with the collateral description. We ended up separating the permanently installed equipment (which required fixture filings) from the mobile equipment (standard UCC-1). For the mobile equipment, we used language that covered 'wherever located' and included specific model numbers. Thanks to everyone who provided guidance - this was much more complex than anticipated but we got there in the end.
0 coins
Kiara Greene
•Glad you got it sorted out! International collateral is definitely one of the trickier aspects of UCC filings.
0 coins
Evelyn Kelly
•Great outcome. Always satisfying when a complex filing finally gets accepted after all that work.
0 coins
Paloma Clark
•This thread will be helpful for others dealing with similar international collateral issues. The fixture vs. mobile equipment distinction is crucial.
0 coins
Kristian Bishop
Congratulations on getting it resolved! This is a perfect example of why international collateral requires such careful attention to detail. The distinction between fixtures and mobile equipment is often overlooked, but it's critical for proper perfection. For others facing similar challenges, I'd recommend creating a detailed inventory of all collateral first, categorizing each piece as either permanently installed or mobile, then crafting separate descriptions for each category. The "wherever located" language is essential for mobile equipment that crosses borders, but as you discovered, you still need to be specific about the actual equipment involved. Thanks for sharing the successful resolution - this will definitely help others navigating similar complex filings.
0 coins
Sean Kelly
•Thanks for that comprehensive breakdown! As someone new to international secured transactions, I'm curious about the timing aspects. When you have mobile equipment that might move between facilities in different countries, how do you handle the potential gap in perfection while the equipment is in transit? Is there a grace period, or do you need to have filings ready in the destination country before the equipment moves?
0 coins