UCC Filing Connecticut Portal Rejecting My Continuation - Name Match Issues
Has anyone dealt with Connecticut's UCC filing system lately? I'm getting rejections on what should be a routine continuation filing and I'm losing my mind here. Filed a UCC-1 back in 2020 for equipment financing on some manufacturing gear, everything went smooth. Now I'm trying to file the UCC-3 continuation before the 5-year mark hits and Connecticut keeps bouncing it back. The debtor name on my original filing shows 'ABC Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but apparently there's some discrepancy with the current business registration. My lender is breathing down my neck because we're 3 months out from lapse and I've tried filing this thing 4 times already. Each rejection notice just says 'debtor name does not match' but I'm copying it exactly from the original UCC-1. Anyone know if Connecticut has some weird quirk with LLC name matching that I'm missing? This is my first time dealing with a continuation in CT and I'm starting to panic about missing the deadline.
44 comments


Holly Lascelles
Connecticut can be really picky about exact name matches. Did you check the current business entity status with the Secretary of State? Sometimes the LLC name gets amended or there's punctuation differences that aren't obvious.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•I did check the SOS database and the name looks identical to me. But maybe there's something I'm not seeing? Is there a way to get the exact formatting they expect?
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
•Try pulling the current Certificate of Good Standing. That should show the exact legal name format Connecticut has on file. Sometimes there's spacing or punctuation differences that aren't visible in the online search.
0 coins
Malia Ponder
UGH Connecticut is THE WORST for this stuff!!! I've had similar issues with name matching and their system is so sensitive to tiny differences. One time I had a rejection because of a missing comma that wasn't even visible in the original filing. Have you tried calling their UCC department directly?
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•I tried calling but got transferred around for 45 minutes and never got a real answer. Their hold music is terrible too lol. Did calling actually help you figure out what was wrong?
0 coins
Malia Ponder
•Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Depends on who you get. But at least they can tell you exactly what field is causing the rejection instead of just that generic 'name does not match' error.
0 coins
Kyle Wallace
•The Connecticut UCC folks are actually pretty helpful if you can get through. Ask to speak with someone who can do a real-time comparison of your filing against the original record.
0 coins
Ryder Ross
I ran into something similar last year with a different state. Turned out the issue wasn't the name itself but how it was formatted in the system. Have you tried using Certana.ai's document verification tool? You can upload both your original UCC-1 and the continuation filing and it'll show you exactly where the discrepancies are. Saved me hours of trial and error.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•Never heard of that tool but it sounds like exactly what I need. Is it expensive? At this point I'm willing to try anything to avoid missing the deadline.
0 coins
Ryder Ross
•It's pretty reasonable and way cheaper than having to deal with a lapsed filing. You just upload your PDFs and it instantly highlights any inconsistencies between documents. Super helpful for catching those tiny formatting differences that cause rejections.
0 coins
Gianni Serpent
•That sounds too good to be true honestly. How accurate is the comparison? I've been burned by automated tools before that miss important details.
0 coins
Henry Delgado
Check if there's any punctuation differences between your original filing and what you're submitting now. Connecticut is notorious for being strict about periods, commas, and spacing in entity names. Even something like 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' can cause a rejection.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•Good point, I'll go through character by character. This is so frustrating though - you'd think their system could handle minor punctuation variations.
0 coins
Henry Delgado
•You would think so but most state systems are pretty rigid about exact matches. It's one of those things that seems like it should be automated but isn't.
0 coins
Olivia Kay
•Some states have gotten better about this but Connecticut definitely hasn't. I always triple check punctuation now after getting burned too many times.
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
Wait, are you sure you're looking at the right UCC-1? If this is equipment financing from 2020, make sure you're referencing the correct filing number. Sometimes lenders file multiple UCC-1s and you might be looking at the wrong one.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•That's a scary thought but I'm pretty sure it's the right one. The filing number and date match what I have in my records. But now you've got me second-guessing myself.
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
•Just double-check to be safe. Pull a search report on your company name and see if there are multiple active filings. Better to be paranoid than sorry when you're this close to the deadline.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
Have you considered whether the LLC has undergone any name changes or amendments since 2020? Even if it looks the same to you, there might have been a formal name change filed that affects how the UCC system sees it.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•I don't think so but I'll check with the client. They've been pretty stable business-wise but maybe there was something administrative I missed.
0 coins
Jibriel Kohn
•Definitely worth checking. Sometimes companies file name amendments for minor changes that don't seem significant but create UCC filing issues later.
0 coins
Edison Estevez
•This happened to me with a client who added 'and Associates' to their name. The UCC system treated it as a completely different entity even though it was just an amendment.
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
Connecticut's online system has been glitchy lately. Are you filing electronically or by paper? Sometimes switching methods can help when the online portal is being weird about rejections.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•I've been doing everything online. Didn't think about trying paper but I'm running short on time. How long does paper processing usually take?
0 coins
Emily Nguyen-Smith
•Paper can take 2-3 weeks which might be cutting it close for you. But if the online system keeps rejecting, it might be your only option.
0 coins
James Johnson
•I'd stick with electronic if possible. Paper filings can get lost or delayed and you're already tight on time.
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
Are you putting the debtor name in the exact same format as the original UCC-1? Like if the original had all caps, you need to use all caps. If it had mixed case, use mixed case. The system is very literal about this stuff.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•I've been copying and pasting directly from the original filing, so the formatting should be identical. But maybe there's some hidden character or something causing issues?
0 coins
Sophia Rodriguez
•That's possible. Sometimes copying from PDFs can introduce weird characters that aren't visible but cause system errors. Try typing it out manually instead of copy-pasting.
0 coins
Mia Green
I actually just went through this exact situation with a Connecticut continuation last month. Ended up using Certana.ai to compare my documents and found that the original UCC-1 had a slight typo in the debtor name that I was perpetuating. Once I corrected it to match the actual business registration, the filing went through immediately.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•Wait, so the original filing had the wrong name but was still accepted? How does that work?
0 coins
Mia Green
•Yeah, apparently the original filing had a minor spelling error that slipped through. But when I tried to continue it, Connecticut's system had gotten stricter about name matching. The document comparison tool showed the discrepancy right away.
0 coins
Emma Bianchi
•That's exactly the kind of thing that drives me crazy about these systems. Inconsistent enforcement of their own rules.
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
Three months out isn't that bad timeline-wise, but I'd definitely try to get this resolved in the next few weeks. Connecticut processes pretty quickly once you get the name right. Don't let it go to the last minute though - that's when mistakes happen.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•Yeah I'm definitely not waiting until the last minute. This whole experience has been stressful enough already. Thanks for the encouragement though.
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
•You'll get it figured out. Name matching issues are super common and once you identify the exact problem, the fix is usually straightforward.
0 coins
Olivia Martinez
•Agreed. I've seen way worse situations than this get resolved. Just stay systematic about checking each possible cause.
0 coins
Charlie Yang
Quick question - are you sure you're using the right form? UCC-3 continuation is correct but just want to make sure you're not accidentally using an amendment form or something. I've made that mistake before.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•Pretty sure I'm using the right form but now I'm paranoid about everything. I selected 'continuation' from the dropdown menu so it should be generating the right UCC-3 type.
0 coins
Charlie Yang
•Yeah that should be right. Just checking because the forms look similar and it's an easy mistake to make when you're stressed about deadlines.
0 coins
Grace Patel
UPDATE: I finally got this resolved! Turns out there was a tiny formatting difference in how 'LLC' was displayed. The document comparison tool someone mentioned earlier showed that the original had 'L.L.C.' with periods but I was filing 'LLC' without periods. Such a small thing but it was causing all the rejections. Filed again with the correct formatting and it went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the help!
0 coins
Ryder Ross
•Glad Certana.ai helped you catch that! Those tiny punctuation differences are so hard to spot manually.
0 coins
Malia Ponder
•This is exactly why I hate these systems. Hours of frustration over a couple of periods. But glad you got it sorted!
0 coins
Holly Lascelles
•Great outcome! That's the kind of detail that drives everyone crazy but at least now you know for future filings.
0 coins