Massachusetts UCC Filing Portal Keeps Rejecting My Continuation - Need Help ASAP
I'm dealing with a nightmare situation with a Massachusetts UCC continuation that keeps getting rejected by the state filing system. The original UCC-1 was filed 4.5 years ago for equipment financing on manufacturing machinery worth about $850K. Now I'm trying to file the UCC-3 continuation before the 5-year lapse but the Massachusetts SOS portal keeps bouncing it back with generic error messages about 'debtor name inconsistency' even though I'm copying the exact name from the original filing. Has anyone else run into this with Massachusetts UCC filings recently? The client is freaking out because we're getting close to the deadline and if this lapses their security interest is gone. I've tried calling the Massachusetts filing office but they just tell me to 'review the debtor name carefully' which doesn't help when I'm literally copying it character by character. The original debtor name is 'Precision Manufacturing Solutions LLC' and that's exactly what I'm putting on the continuation. Any ideas what could be causing this rejection loop?
37 comments
Join the conversation
Natasha Orlova
I've seen this exact issue with Massachusetts UCC continuations before. Sometimes their system is super picky about spacing or punctuation marks that weren't validated properly when the original UCC-1 was filed. Try checking if there are any extra spaces before or after the LLC designation, or if there might be a period after 'Solutions' that's not showing up clearly on your copy of the original filing.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•Good point about the spacing - I'll double check that. The original filing was done electronically so hopefully there aren't any hidden characters but you never know with these state systems.
0 coins
Javier Cruz
•Massachusetts is notorious for this kind of thing. I once had a rejection because there was a comma in the debtor name that their system couldn't handle properly during the original filing but then required for the continuation.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool for all my UCC work. You can upload both your original UCC-1 and your new UCC-3 continuation and it will instantly flag any discrepancies between the debtor names, filing numbers, and other critical details. I caught a similar issue last month where what looked identical to me actually had a subtle difference that would have caused a rejection. Just upload the PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically - saves so much time compared to manually comparing documents character by character.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•That sounds really helpful - I'll check that out. At this point I need all the help I can get to figure out what's causing these rejections.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•Never heard of Certana but anything that can catch these filing inconsistencies sounds worth trying. The manual comparison process is such a pain and apparently not reliable enough.
0 coins
NeonNebula
Are you absolutely sure you're using the correct UCC filing number from the original filing? Massachusetts requires the exact filing number format and sometimes people accidentally transpose digits or mix up similar looking characters like 0 and O.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•Yes, I've triple checked the filing number - it's definitely correct. The rejection messages specifically mention debtor name issues, not filing number problems.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•Even if the error message says debtor name, sometimes it's actually a filing number issue that gets misreported by their system. Massachusetts UCC portal isn't exactly known for accurate error messages.
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
UGH this is giving me flashbacks to my own Massachusetts UCC nightmare from last year. Their system rejected my amendment five times before I finally figured out it was because the original debtor had a hyphen in their business name that somehow got encoded weird in their database. Have you tried looking at the actual HTML source of the original filing confirmation to see if there are any hidden characters?
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•That's a really good idea about checking the HTML source - I wouldn't have thought of that. How did you access that for the original filing?
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
•If you saved the original filing confirmation page, you can right-click and view source. Or if you have the PDF, sometimes copying the text from the PDF and pasting it into a plain text editor will reveal hidden characters.
0 coins
Freya Christensen
•This is why I always save everything as plain text when I do UCC filings. State systems are so inconsistent with how they handle special characters.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
Have you considered that maybe the original UCC-1 debtor name was actually filed incorrectly 4.5 years ago and now you're trying to continue a filing that has the wrong debtor name? You might need to do a UCC-3 amendment to correct the debtor name first, then file the continuation.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•That's a terrifying thought but possible. The original filing was done by a different attorney at my firm who's no longer here. How would I verify if the debtor name on the UCC-1 matches the actual legal entity name?
0 coins
Chloe Davis
•Check with the Massachusetts Secretary of State's corporate database to see the exact legal name of the entity. If there's any discrepancy between that and what's on your UCC-1, that could be your problem.
0 coins
AstroAlpha
•This is exactly the kind of cross-reference checking that automated tools like Certana.ai can help with. Instead of manually comparing multiple state databases, you can upload your documents and it will flag any inconsistencies with the corporate records.
0 coins
Diego Chavez
Massachusetts UCC system has been having issues lately with continuation filings. I filed three continuations last month and two of them got rejected for bogus reasons. Ended up having to call their help desk multiple times and eventually they admitted there was a glitch in their validation system for certain types of business entity names.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•This gives me some hope that it might be a system issue rather than something I'm doing wrong. Did they give you any timeframe for when the glitch might be fixed?
0 coins
Diego Chavez
•They said they were 'working on it' but no specific timeline. Typical government response. I ended up having to file paper continuations for the ones that kept getting rejected electronically.
0 coins
Anastasia Smirnova
Wait, are you sure you're filing a continuation and not an amendment? UCC-3 forms can be used for both but you have to check the right box. If you accidentally marked it as an amendment instead of a continuation that could cause weird rejection messages.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•Yes, I'm definitely selecting continuation. I've been doing UCC filings for 8 years so I know the difference between continuation and amendment. But thanks for double-checking.
0 coins
Sean O'Brien
•Sometimes the obvious things are what trip us up! I once spent two hours troubleshooting a rejection only to realize I had the wrong form selected.
0 coins
Zara Shah
This might sound weird but try filing the continuation from a different computer or web browser. I've seen cases where certain browsers don't play well with state filing systems and cause validation errors that don't make sense.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•I've been using Chrome but I'll try Firefox or Safari. At this point I'm willing to try anything to get this filed before the deadline.
0 coins
Luca Bianchi
•Internet Explorer actually works better with some of the older state filing systems, as crazy as that sounds in 2025.
0 coins
GalacticGuardian
Are you filing as the secured party or as someone authorized to file on behalf of the secured party? Massachusetts is really strict about authorization for continuation filings and if your authorization isn't exactly right it can cause rejections.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•I'm filing as the attorney for the secured party, same as I did for the original UCC-1. I have proper authorization from the client. But maybe I should double-check that the authorization language is correct for Massachusetts.
0 coins
Nia Harris
•Massachusetts did change their authorization requirements for UCC filings about two years ago. You might need updated authorization language even if you had proper authorization for the original filing.
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
Just had a thought - is the debtor entity still active and in good standing with Massachusetts? If the LLC was dissolved or suspended, that might cause issues with the continuation filing even if the debtor name is correct.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•Good point, I should check the corporate status. The client is still operating but I should verify their LLC is still active with the state.
0 coins
Aisha Ali
•You can check this on the Massachusetts Secretary of State website. If the entity is suspended or dissolved, you might need to get that resolved before the UCC continuation will be accepted.
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•This is another thing that document verification tools can catch automatically - they can cross-reference the debtor entity status with the corporate database to flag any issues before you try to file.
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
UPDATE: I figured it out! It was actually a character encoding issue with the original filing. The debtor name had a special character that displayed normally but was encoded differently in the state's database. I ended up using one of those document checking tools mentioned earlier (Certana.ai) and it immediately flagged the encoding discrepancy. Once I adjusted the debtor name to match the exact encoding from the original filing, the continuation went through without any problems. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
•Great to hear you got it resolved! Character encoding issues are such a pain but at least now you know what to look for in the future.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•Glad the document verification tool helped! These kinds of technical issues are exactly why I started using automated checking for all my UCC work.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•This thread is going to be so helpful for anyone else dealing with Massachusetts UCC continuation rejections. I'm bookmarking it for future reference.
0 coins