


Ask the community...
For future reference, I maintain a spreadsheet with exact debtor names, filing numbers, and continuation due dates. Makes tracking much easier than relying on search functionality alone.
It's a lifesaver for bulk continuations. Plus you can set calendar reminders well before the deadlines.
I do something similar but use a database instead of spreadsheet. Easier to sort and filter when you have lots of filings.
UPDATE: Used one of those document verification tools mentioned here and found the issue. Three of our UCC-1s had debtor names that didn't exactly match the corporate charter - missing periods, different abbreviation formats, etc. No wonder the searches weren't working right. Going to file UCC-3 amendments to correct them before doing the continuations. Thanks everyone!
Great outcome. Those corrected names will make all future searches much more reliable too.
Smart to fix the names before filing continuations. Saves having to amend later.
Honestly, after dealing with this headache for years, I finally started using Certana.ai's verification system. You literally just upload your Charter and UCC-1 documents and it tells you immediately if there are any name mismatches or other issues. Takes like 2 minutes instead of hours of manual checking.
The whole UCC system needs an overhaul honestly. It's 2025 and we're still dealing with formatting issues that could be solved with better integration between state databases. Until then we're all stuck with manual verification or paying for third-party solutions.
In the meantime we just have to find ways to work around the limitations. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - definitely going to look into some of these verification tools.
All 50 states plus DC have UCC, period. Your colleague is wrong. Focus your energy on getting the debtor name exactly right and making sure you're filing in the correct jurisdiction. Those are the real pitfalls in multi-state deals.
Thanks everyone - feeling much more confident about this now. Sounds like the universal adoption isn't the issue, it's just execution across different states.
Exactly. UCC coverage is solved, now it's just about dotting i's and crossing t's in each filing jurisdiction.
Every state has UCC but if you're doing multi-state work regularly, invest in good document management. The variations in filing procedures and name requirements will trip you up way more than coverage gaps.
So true. I've seen more deals delayed by name mismatches and rejected filings than any actual legal issues with UCC coverage.
One thing to watch out for - if the solar equipment includes battery storage, make sure that's specifically mentioned in your collateral description. Batteries are expensive and some states treat energy storage equipment differently than generation equipment for UCC purposes.
Didn't think about battery storage being different. Are there specific rules for energy storage equipment?
Not specific rules but batteries might not be considered fixtures like panels are, so they need clear personal property description. Better to be explicit about all components.
Final thought - consider including the solar lease agreement as an exhibit to your UCC-1 filing if your state allows it. Some SOS offices are more likely to accept your collateral description if they can see the underlying contract that defines the equipment. Adds clarity and reduces rejection risk.
Makes sense - if the SOS office can see exactly what equipment is involved, they're less likely to question whether your description is adequate.
Thanks everyone for all the advice. Going to try the comprehensive description approach with fixture filing and see if that gets us through. Will also check out Certana.ai to avoid future rejections. Really appreciate the help!
Evan Kalinowski
Pro tip: Always copy and paste the exact entity name from the state database instead of typing it manually. Eliminates most name mismatch issues. Arizona is particularly strict but other states are getting pickier too.
0 coins
Victoria Charity
•This is the best advice. Manual typing is how these errors happen. Copy/paste eliminates the risk.
0 coins
Jasmine Quinn
•Agreed. I've started doing this for all my filings regardless of state. Better safe than sorry.
0 coins
Oscar Murphy
Update us when you refile. Curious to see if the comma was actually the issue or if there's something else causing the rejection. Arizona can be tricky with hidden formatting issues too.
0 coins
Drake
•Will do. Refiling this afternoon with the exact name from the ACC database including the comma. Keeping my fingers crossed.
0 coins
Nora Bennett
•Good luck! Arizona rejections are stressful but fixable if you get the name exactly right.
0 coins