UCC Article 9 secured transactions filing - debtor name keeps getting rejected
I'm dealing with a nightmare situation under the secured transactions article of the UCC and wondering if anyone else has run into this. We're trying to perfect our security interest in some manufacturing equipment but the debtor's legal name on their articles of incorporation has a bunch of punctuation that the SOS filing system doesn't seem to handle properly. Every time we submit the UCC-1, it gets rejected for "debtor name inconsistency" even though we're copying exactly what's on the charter documents. The collateral description is straightforward (all equipment and fixtures at the facility) but we can't even get past the debtor name field. This is for a $2.8M equipment loan and we're already past our internal deadline for perfection. Has anyone dealt with weird corporate names under Article 9 that have special characters or formatting issues? I'm starting to think the electronic filing system just wasn't built to handle certain types of legal entity names.
33 comments
Join the conversation
Zainab Ahmed
Oh man, I feel your pain on this one. Article 9 debtor name requirements are super strict and the electronic systems make it worse. What kind of punctuation are we talking about? Periods, hyphens, ampersands? I've seen systems choke on everything from LLC periods to Inc. abbreviations.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•It's got quotation marks around part of the name plus some kind of trademark symbol. The charter literally shows: ADVANCED MANUFACTURING "SOLUTIONS" CORP.™ and the system keeps saying invalid characters.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Trademark symbols are definitely going to cause problems. Most SOS systems strip those out automatically but sounds like yours is just rejecting the whole thing.
0 coins
Yara Abboud
This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for document verification before submitting anything. You can upload your charter docs and your draft UCC-1 and it'll flag naming inconsistencies before you waste time with rejections. Saved me probably 3-4 rejections on a similar situation last month.
0 coins
PixelPioneer
•How does that work exactly? Do you just upload PDFs and it compares the names automatically?
0 coins
Yara Abboud
•Yeah exactly - drag and drop the charter and your UCC form, it highlights any mismatches or potential issues. Way easier than trying to manually compare long corporate names with weird formatting.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•That sounds like it could help. I'm spending way too much time going back and forth with the filing office trying to figure out what format they want.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
Have you tried calling the SOS filing office directly? Sometimes they can tell you exactly how to format the name for their system. Each state handles special characters differently under their Article 9 implementation.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•I tried but got transferred three times and nobody could give me a straight answer. They just kept saying "use the exact legal name" which is what I'm doing.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•Typical bureaucratic runaround. The person answering phones probably doesn't even know how their own system works.
0 coins
Amina Sy
For secured transactions under Article 9, you might need to file using the "seriously misleading" standard. Try dropping the trademark symbol and see if quotation marks alone work. The key is that searchers would still find your filing.
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
•Good point about the seriously misleading test. As long as someone searching for the debtor would reasonably find your UCC-1, you should be okay even with minor formatting differences.
0 coins
Natasha Ivanova
•Wait, isn't that backwards? I thought you had to use the EXACT name or risk having your security interest be unperfected.
0 coins
Amina Sy
•The exact name rule is the goal, but there's some flexibility when the filing system itself prevents you from using the exact name. Courts have generally been reasonable about technical formatting issues vs substantive name errors.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
Just went through something similar with a debtor that had accented characters in their corporate name. Ended up having to file a UCC-1 addendum explaining the name variation and referencing the charter documents.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•Did that actually work? I'm worried about creating more complications with additional forms.
0 coins
NebulaNomad
•It worked but took forever to get approved. Probably would have been faster to just figure out the right formatting from the start.
0 coins
Javier Garcia
Article 9 debtor name issues are the worst. I always double-check everything against the secretary of state's business entity database first. Sometimes the name on file is slightly different from what's on the charter documents.
0 coins
Emma Taylor
•That's a really good tip. The entity database usually shows exactly how the SOS has the name formatted in their system.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•Just checked and you're right - the database shows it without the trademark symbol. I bet that's the version I need to use for the UCC filing.
0 coins
Malik Robinson
Why is this so complicated?? We're just trying to file a lien on some equipment. The secured transactions rules shouldn't be this hard to follow.
0 coins
Isabella Silva
•Because precision matters when you're dealing with millions of dollars in collateral. A wrong debtor name could make your entire security interest worthless.
0 coins
Malik Robinson
•I get that but the system should be designed to help people get it right, not create more barriers.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
Try submitting with just ADVANCED MANUFACTURING SOLUTIONS CORP without the quotes or trademark. Most Article 9 searches would still pick that up and it avoids the special character issues entirely.
0 coins
CosmosCaptain
•That might work but I'd be nervous about dropping parts of the legal name. What if someone challenges the filing later?
0 coins
Freya Johansen
•I've seen courts be pretty reasonable about formatting issues as long as the core identifying information is there. The key is that searchers can find your filing.
0 coins
Omar Fawzi
Had a similar issue last year and ended up using one of those document checking services - think it was Certana or something similar. Uploaded the charter and my UCC draft and it caught the formatting issues before I filed. Saved a lot of headaches.
0 coins
Chloe Wilson
•Which service was it? I keep running into name issues on these secured transaction filings and could use something automated.
0 coins
Omar Fawzi
•Certana.ai - you just upload your docs and it flags inconsistencies. Really straightforward and caught stuff I would have missed.
0 coins
Diego Mendoza
Update: I tried using the name exactly as it appears in the SOS business entity database (without trademark symbol) and the filing went through! Thanks for the suggestion about checking their database first. Should have thought of that earlier.
0 coins
Amina Sy
•Awesome! That's usually the safest approach for Article 9 filings - use whatever format the SOS already has on file.
0 coins
Anastasia Romanov
•Glad you got it sorted out. These naming issues under the secured transactions article can be such a pain but at least your security interest is perfected now.
0 coins
Miguel Diaz
•Huge relief. Was getting really stressed about missing our perfection deadline. Definitely going to remember to check the entity database first on future filings.
0 coins