< Back to UCC Document Community

Dylan Cooper

UCC-308 form confusion - is this even a real filing type?

Okay this is probably going to sound stupid but I'm completely lost here. My loan officer mentioned something about a UCC-308 form that needs to be filed for our equipment financing deal, but when I go to the Secretary of State website I can't find anything about UCC-308 anywhere. I see UCC-1, UCC-3, UCC-11 but no UCC-308. Am I missing something obvious? The loan closes next week and I'm starting to panic that there's some special form I don't know about. Has anyone else run into this UCC-308 thing before or did my loan officer maybe misspeak? I've been doing filings for 3 years and never heard of it.

Sofia Perez

•

There's no such thing as a UCC-308 form in any state that I'm aware of. Your loan officer probably meant UCC-3 (amendment/continuation/termination form) or possibly got confused with some internal bank form number. The standard UCC forms are UCC-1 (initial financing statement), UCC-3 (amendment), and UCC-11 (information request). What exactly did they say this UCC-308 was supposed to accomplish?

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

They said it was for 'additional collateral documentation' but that doesn't make sense because wouldn't that just be an amendment on UCC-3? I'm going to call them tomorrow and get clarification.

0 coins

Definitely sounds like internal bank paperwork got mixed up with actual UCC forms. Happens more than you'd think.

0 coins

I work at a credit union and we see this confusion all the time. Loan officers sometimes reference internal form numbers when they mean to say UCC forms. UCC-308 is not a real Secretary of State filing form. You need to clarify with your lender what they actually need - it's probably a UCC-1 initial filing or a UCC-3 amendment to add collateral.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

That makes me feel better! I was starting to think I was completely incompetent at this stuff.

0 coins

Ava Johnson

•

Don't feel bad, even experienced people get tripped up by lender jargon sometimes.

0 coins

Miguel Diaz

•

The real question is what collateral needs to be documented and whether it's already covered in an existing filing or needs a new UCC-1.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

Had this EXACT same thing happen last month except they called it UCC-315 or something equally made-up. Turned out they needed me to upload our loan docs to some verification system to make sure the debtor names matched between the loan agreement and what they were planning to file. I ended up using Certana.ai's document checker - you just upload your PDFs and it instantly flags any name inconsistencies between documents. Saved me from a major headache when it caught that our corporate name was slightly different on the loan docs vs what they had for the UCC-1.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Wait that sounds useful - is it free to check documents? Our company name has some LLC variations that might cause issues.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

Yeah it's pretty straightforward, just upload the docs and it highlights any mismatches. Way better than trying to compare everything manually.

0 coins

Connor Byrne

•

Name consistency is huge - I've seen deals delayed weeks because of tiny variations in how the debtor name appears across documents.

0 coins

Yara Abboud

•

OMG thank you for posting this because I've been googling UCC-308 for hours thinking I was losing my mind!! My attorney mentioned it in passing and I couldn't find it anywhere. Clearly there's some widespread confusion happening.

0 coins

Sofia Perez

•

It's becoming a real problem when professionals are using made-up form numbers. Everyone needs to stick to the actual UCC Article 9 forms.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Right?? I'm glad I'm not the only one who was confused.

0 coins

PixelPioneer

•

This is why I always ask for the specific Secretary of State form number when lenders mention UCC filings. Half the time they're talking about internal processing forms, not actual state filings. The real UCC forms are standardized - if you can't find it on your state's SOS website, it probably doesn't exist.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Good point, I should have pushed back when they first mentioned it instead of assuming I didn't know something.

0 coins

Exactly! When in doubt, go straight to the source - the Secretary of State website has all the legitimate forms.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

I keep a bookmark folder of all my state's UCC forms for exactly this reason. Saves so much time and confusion.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

Plot twist - what if they meant Form 308 from some other context entirely? Like tax forms or corporate filings? Sometimes people get their form numbers completely mixed up when they're juggling multiple deals.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Ugh that's entirely possible. This deal has like 15 different forms between the SBA, state licensing, and the bank.

0 coins

Yeah that's a good point - could be completely unrelated to UCC filings at all.

0 coins

Wait I think I know what happened here. Some banks have internal workflow systems that assign their own form numbers to document checklists. So when they say UCC-308 they might mean 'step 308 in our internal loan processing system' which includes getting UCC documents filed. It's confusing as hell but it happens.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

This actually makes perfect sense. They probably have some internal checklist and the UCC filing is item 308 or something.

0 coins

Banking software does create a lot of confusion with internal reference numbers vs actual legal forms.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

I've seen this exact thing with different lenders - they all have their own numbering systems that have nothing to do with actual state forms.

0 coins

Javier Garcia

•

Whatever they meant, just make sure your actual UCC-1 filing has the debtor name EXACTLY as it appears on your organizing documents. That's where most problems happen, not with mysterious form numbers.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Good reminder - I should double check our Articles of Incorporation against what they're planning to file.

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

And check if there's any DBA names that need to be included too.

0 coins

Just had a similar situation where the lender kept referencing forms that didn't exist. Turns out they wanted me to run all our documents through some verification process first. I used Certana.ai to cross-check everything - it's pretty slick, you upload your charter docs and planned UCC-1 and it flags any inconsistencies instantly. Found two name variations that would have caused filing rejections.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

That's the second mention of that tool - sounds like it might be worth checking out before we finalize anything.

0 coins

Prevention is definitely better than dealing with rejected filings after the fact.

0 coins

Zainab Ahmed

•

Yeah it saved me from a huge mess when I was dealing with the made-up form number situation.

0 coins

The bottom line is that UCC-308 is not a real form. Period. Your lender needs to clarify what they actually need. Don't let them make you feel stupid for not knowing about non-existent forms - that's on them for using confusing terminology.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Thanks, I needed that validation. Sometimes you second-guess yourself when professionals use terms you don't recognize.

0 coins

CosmosCaptain

•

Absolutely - if it's not on the Secretary of State website, it's not a real UCC form.

0 coins

Just remember that you're the expert on UCC filings here, not necessarily the loan officer. They handle loans, you handle the filings.

0 coins

Omar Fawzi

•

Update us after you talk to your loan officer! I'm curious what they actually meant. This thread is going to help a lot of people who run into the same confusion.

0 coins

Dylan Cooper

•

Will do! Meeting with them tomorrow morning so I should have answers by afternoon.

0 coins

Chloe Wilson

•

Yeah definitely post an update - these mystery form situations are always interesting to see resolved.

0 coins

This is such a common issue! I've been doing UCC filings for over 5 years and I still occasionally get lenders who reference internal form numbers that don't exist in the real world. The fact that multiple people in this thread have experienced similar confusion shows this is a systemic problem with how some financial institutions communicate filing requirements. Dylan, definitely push for clarity on what they actually need - it's probably just a standard UCC-1 or UCC-3, but they're using their own internal tracking numbers. And don't feel bad about questioning it - asking for clarification is always better than assuming you missed something. The official UCC forms are pretty straightforward once you cut through all the bank jargon.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today