Solar mosaic UCC subordination filing complications - debtor name mismatch issues
Running into a nightmare scenario with a solar project financing deal. We have a mosaic of solar panel installations across multiple properties, and the original UCC-1 filing has the debtor name listed as "ABC Solar Holdings LLC" but the actual legal entity on the corporate charter is "ABC Solar Holdings, LLC" (note the comma). Now we need to do a UCC subordination to restructure the lien priority because a senior lender is coming in, but I'm worried the name discrepancy will cause the subordination filing to get rejected or worse - make it legally ineffective. The collateral description covers "all solar equipment, inverters, and fixtures installed at properties listed in Schedule A" but I'm concerned about whether a subordination agreement will even be valid if there's a debtor name mismatch between the original UCC-1 and the new subordination documents. Has anyone dealt with solar mosaic UCC subordination where the original filing had naming issues? This is a $2.8M project and I can't afford to mess this up.
35 comments
Join the conversation
Ethan Wilson
Been there with solar deals. That comma issue is actually pretty common and it can definitely cause problems with subordination agreements. The UCC system is very strict about exact debtor name matches. You'll probably need to file a UCC-3 amendment first to correct the debtor name, then do your subordination. What state are you filing in? Some states are more forgiving than others about punctuation discrepancies.
0 coins
Yuki Tanaka
•Agree 100% about the amendment route. We had a similar issue with a wind farm project where the debtor name had spacing differences. Filed a UCC-3 amendment to correct the name first, then proceeded with the subordination. Worked perfectly.
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
•Wait, do you really need to amend first? I thought subordination agreements could work even with minor name variations as long as the intent is clear and the collateral matches up.
0 coins
Andre Laurent
This is exactly why I always double-check corporate documents before any UCC filing. Solar projects are complex enough without adding name mismatch issues. For your subordination, you'll want to make sure the description of the secured party's interest is precise. Since you mentioned multiple properties, are all the installations covered under one UCC-1 or do you have separate filings for each location?
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•It's all under one UCC-1 with Schedule A listing the properties. The solar equipment is considered fixtures in some locations and personal property in others depending on the installation method.
0 coins
AstroAce
•Oh boy, fixtures vs personal property distinction in solar deals can get messy. Make sure your subordination language addresses both scenarios clearly.
0 coins
Zoe Kyriakidou
I actually just discovered something that might help you - there's this tool called Certana.ai that can verify UCC document consistency by uploading PDFs. I used it last month when I had a similar subordination issue with mismatched debtor names. You upload your charter documents and UCC-1, and it instantly flags any inconsistencies. Saved me from filing incorrect subordination paperwork. It caught three name variations I hadn't even noticed across different corporate documents.
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•That sounds useful. How accurate is it with complex collateral descriptions like solar installations across multiple properties?
0 coins
Zoe Kyriakidou
•Very accurate in my experience. It cross-references the exact language and highlights discrepancies. For solar projects with complex collateral schedules, it's been a lifesaver.
0 coins
Mei Zhang
UGH this is why I hate solar financing deals! The UCC requirements are already complicated enough without having to worry about punctuation in debtor names. Last year I had THREE different solar projects get rejected because of similar issues - missing commas, extra spaces, LLC vs L.L.C. variations. The system is just too rigid for complex commercial transactions.
0 coins
Liam McConnell
•I feel your pain! Had a $1.5M solar array deal nearly fall apart because of a period missing after 'Inc' in the debtor name. These filing systems need to be more forgiving.
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•At least you caught it before closing. I've seen deals where the subordination gets challenged months later because of name mismatches.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
For solar mosaic projects, I always recommend getting a comprehensive UCC search done before proceeding with any subordination. The complexity of multiple installations under one financing structure creates additional risks. You want to make sure there aren't any other liens or encumbrances that could complicate your subordination agreement.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•Good point about the UCC search. Solar projects often have equipment suppliers who might have filed their own liens.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
•Especially with mosaic structures where you have multiple contractors potentially involved across different properties.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
Quick question - when you say 'subordination,' are you doing an intercreditor agreement or actually modifying the UCC filing itself? Because if it's just an intercreditor agreement between lenders, the debtor name mismatch might not be as critical. But if you're filing a UCC-3 to subordinate the lien, then yes, exact name matching is crucial.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
•It's a UCC-3 subordination filing, not just an intercreditor agreement. The senior lender requires it to be filed on public record.
0 coins
Sofia Gutierrez
•Then definitely get that name corrected first. UCC-3 subordinations need perfect alignment with the original UCC-1.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
I had a client use Certana.ai for a similar solar project last month. They were doing a complex refinancing with multiple subordination agreements needed. The tool caught several inconsistencies between their original UCC-1 filings and the new subordination documents before they submitted anything. Really streamlined the process and avoided potential rejections.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•How long does the verification process take? We're under a tight deadline for our subordination filing.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
•Almost instant. You upload the PDFs and get results in minutes. Much faster than manually comparing documents line by line.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
What's the timeline on your solar project? If you're close to closing, you might want to consider having both tracks ready - file the UCC-3 amendment to correct the name AND prepare the subordination documents simultaneously. Some states process amendments faster than others.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•Smart approach. Better to be over-prepared than caught short when dealing with solar project financing deadlines.
0 coins
Zainab Abdulrahman
•Especially with mosaic structures where you have multiple moving parts and stakeholders involved.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
Just want to add that solar equipment collateral descriptions can be tricky in subordination agreements. Make sure you're clearly identifying whether the panels are fixtures or personal property in each location, because that affects the perfection requirements and priority rules.
0 coins
Yara Elias
•Great point. Fixture filings have different rules than regular UCC-1s when it comes to subordination.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•And some installations might be considered 'accessions' to real property rather than fixtures, which adds another layer of complexity.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
Honestly, for a $2.8M solar mosaic deal, I'd recommend getting a UCC attorney involved if you haven't already. The combination of name discrepancies, multiple properties, and subordination requirements is complex enough that it's worth the legal fees to get it right the first time.
0 coins
Paolo Moretti
•Agreed. Solar financing deals have enough moving parts without adding UCC filing mistakes to the mix.
0 coins
Amina Diop
•Plus if something goes wrong with the subordination, it could affect the entire project financing structure.
0 coins
Oliver Weber
Update us on how this turns out! I'm working on a similar solar mosaic project and would love to know what approach works best for the subordination filing with name mismatches.
0 coins
Natasha Romanova
•Same here - dealing with a solar farm that has similar debtor name issues across multiple UCC filings.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•These solar mosaic deals are becoming more common, so having a proven approach would be really helpful for the community.
0 coins
Ethan Taylor
This is a classic issue I've seen in renewable energy financing - that comma difference between "ABC Solar Holdings LLC" and "ABC Solar Holdings, LLC" can absolutely torpedo your subordination filing. Here's what I'd recommend: First, run a UCC search to confirm exactly how the debtor name appears on the current filing. Then file a UCC-3 amendment to correct the name BEFORE attempting the subordination. Most states require exact name matching for subordination effectiveness. Also, given that you're dealing with solar equipment across multiple properties, make sure your collateral description in the subordination agreement addresses both fixture and personal property classifications - this varies by state and installation method. The $2.8M size definitely justifies getting specialized UCC counsel involved to avoid any missteps that could jeopardize the entire financing structure.
0 coins
Madison Tipne
•This is incredibly helpful, @Ethan Taylor! As someone new to solar financing deals, I'm curious about the timing aspect - how long does a UCC-3 amendment typically take to process before you can safely proceed with the subordination filing? Also, you mentioned the collateral description needs to address both fixture and personal property classifications - are there standard templates or language that work well for solar mosaic projects, or does it really need to be customized for each state's requirements?
0 coins