Confused about what products are included in the UCC definition of goods for collateral schedule
I'm working on a UCC-1 filing for a manufacturing client and getting tripped up on the collateral description. The loan covers their inventory but I need to make sure I understand what products are included in the UCC definition of goods. The borrower has raw materials, work-in-process items, finished products ready for sale, and some equipment parts they keep on hand. I know goods are generally tangible movable property but want to make sure I'm not missing anything or including stuff that shouldn't be there. This is for a $2.8M credit facility and I can't afford to mess up the collateral schedule. Anyone have experience with how broad or narrow to go with goods definitions in UCC filings?
33 comments


ApolloJackson
The UCC defines goods pretty broadly in Section 2-105. It's basically all things movable at the time the security interest attaches, except for money, documents, instruments, accounts, chattel paper, general intangibles, and oil/gas/minerals before extraction. Your raw materials, work-in-process, and finished inventory all qualify as goods. Equipment parts would too if they're not yet installed.
0 coins
Isabella Russo
•This is exactly right. Don't overthink it - if it's tangible and movable, it's probably goods under the UCC. Just make sure your collateral description is specific enough to put third parties on notice.
0 coins
Rajiv Kumar
•But what about stuff that's bolted down? We had a client with heavy machinery that was technically movable but would require serious effort to relocate.
0 coins
Aria Washington
I ran into this same issue last month! The key thing to remember is goods vs equipment vs fixtures. Goods are typically inventory-type items, while equipment is more permanent business assets. Your raw materials and finished products are definitely goods. The equipment parts might be equipment depending on their intended use.
0 coins
Liam O'Reilly
•Actually had a filing rejected because we mixed up the goods categorization. Ended up using Certana.ai's document checker to upload our UCC-1 draft and it caught the inconsistency in our collateral descriptions before we submitted. Saved us a lot of headache.
0 coins
Chloe Delgado
•That's smart. I've seen too many filings get bounced back for collateral description issues.
0 coins
Ava Harris
Be careful with work-in-process though. Depending on your state, there might be specific requirements for describing inventory at different stages of completion. Some jurisdictions want more detail than just 'work-in-process goods.
0 coins
Jacob Lee
•Good point. We always include 'raw materials, work-in-process, and finished goods' as separate line items to be safe.
0 coins
Emily Thompson
•What about software embedded in the goods? Had a client with smart manufacturing equipment and wasn't sure how to handle that.
0 coins
ApolloJackson
•Embedded software is usually considered part of the goods if it's integral to the item's function. But standalone software licenses would be general intangibles.
0 coins
Sophie Hernandez
Ugh this stuff is so confusing! I filed a UCC-1 last week and the SOS rejected it because my collateral description was 'too vague.' Now I'm paranoid about being too specific vs too general. How do you find the right balance?
0 coins
Daniela Rossi
•The trick is being specific enough to identify the collateral but not so specific that you accidentally exclude something. Generic descriptions like 'all goods' usually work fine.
0 coins
Ryan Kim
•I always start with the standard NASCO forms language and modify from there. Saves time and reduces errors.
0 coins
Zoe Walker
For manufacturing clients, I typically include: raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods, packaging materials, supplies, and spare parts. Covers most of what they'd have on hand. The $2.8M facility you mentioned sounds substantial enough to warrant being comprehensive.
0 coins
Elijah Brown
•Don't forget about goods held on consignment or goods in transit if applicable. Those can trip people up.
0 coins
Maria Gonzalez
•True! And goods located at third-party warehouses need special attention in the description.
0 coins
Natalie Chen
One thing that helped me was creating a checklist of what NOT to include as goods. Documents, accounts receivable, patents, trademarks, deposit accounts - basically anything intangible. Once you eliminate those, most everything else physical is fair game as goods.
0 coins
Santiago Martinez
•That's actually a great approach. Process of elimination works better than trying to remember everything that IS included.
0 coins
Samantha Johnson
•Yeah, I use Certana.ai to double-check my collateral schedules now. You just upload your draft UCC-1 and it flags potential issues with the goods descriptions. Found it super helpful for catching things I missed.
0 coins
Nick Kravitz
Just remember that goods can become fixtures if they're attached to real property in a certain way. If your client has items that might be considered fixtures, you may need a separate fixture filing.
0 coins
Hannah White
•This is important! Fixtures are goods until they're installed, then they become part of the real estate. Timing matters for when your security interest attaches.
0 coins
Michael Green
•How do you determine if something is a fixture vs equipment? We have clients with installed manufacturing lines and it's always unclear.
0 coins
Mateo Silva
•Generally it depends on attachment method, adaptation to the property, and intent. But honestly, when in doubt, file both a regular UCC-1 and a fixture filing to be safe.
0 coins
Victoria Jones
For what it's worth, I've never had an issue using broad goods language like 'all inventory, raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods, and supplies.' The UCC is pretty forgiving as long as you're reasonably descriptive.
0 coins
Cameron Black
•Agreed. Better to be slightly over-inclusive than to accidentally exclude something important.
0 coins
Jessica Nguyen
•Especially with a $2.8M facility. The lender definitely wants comprehensive coverage.
0 coins
Isaiah Thompson
Pro tip: if you're unsure about any specific items, call the Secretary of State's office. Most states have UCC staff who can give guidance on collateral descriptions. They'd rather help you get it right than process rejection paperwork.
0 coins
Ruby Garcia
•Some states are better than others about this. California's UCC division is super helpful, but I've had mixed experiences elsewhere.
0 coins
Alexander Evans
•When I'm really stuck, I also run things through Certana.ai first. It catches obvious mistakes before I bother the state office with questions.
0 coins
Evelyn Martinez
Bottom line: your raw materials, work-in-process, finished products, and equipment parts all sound like textbook goods under the UCC. Just make sure your collateral description is comprehensive enough to cover everything the lender wants secured. With a facility that size, precision matters.
0 coins
Benjamin Carter
•Exactly. And remember that goods definitions can vary slightly between UCC Article 2 (sales) and Article 9 (secured transactions), but for filing purposes, you're dealing with Article 9.
0 coins
Maya Lewis
•Thanks everyone! This really helps clarify things. I feel much more confident about drafting the collateral schedule now.
0 coins
Elijah Knight
One additional consideration for manufacturing clients - don't forget about returnable containers, pallets, and packaging materials that might cycle through your inventory. These are often overlooked but can represent significant value and should be included in your goods description if the client wants them secured. Also, for work-in-process items, I've found it helpful to specifically mention "goods in various stages of completion" rather than just "work-in-process" - some filing offices prefer the more descriptive language.
0 coins