< Back to UCC Document Community

Luca Russo

Blueline UCC filing rejection - debtor name mismatch issue

Got my blueline UCC filing kicked back from the SOS office yesterday and I'm pulling my hair out here. Filed a UCC-1 for a commercial equipment loan and they rejected it saying the debtor name doesn't match their records exactly. The loan docs show 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions LLC' but apparently their corporate registration shows 'Advanced Manufacturing Solutions, LLC' - notice the comma difference. Now I'm scrambling because the loan funded already and we need this perfected ASAP. Has anyone dealt with this kind of blueline UCC filing name precision issue before? The borrower swears this is how they've always written their company name on everything but the state database is showing the comma version. Do I need to refile or can I amend this somehow? This is holding up a $250K equipment financing deal.

Nia Wilson

•

Ugh, the comma thing is such a pain! I've seen this exact scenario probably 20 times. You'll need to refile the UCC-1 with the EXACT name as it appears in the state's corporate database - that's the 'exact name' rule. Don't try to amend, just refile completely with the comma included. It's annoying but that's how the SOS systems work.

0 coins

Mateo Sanchez

•

Seconding this. The state database name is gospel for UCC filings. Even punctuation has to match exactly or they'll bounce it every time.

0 coins

Aisha Mahmood

•

Wait, can't you file under both versions to be safe? Like file one UCC-1 with comma and one without?

0 coins

Nia Wilson

•

You could but that's overkill and expensive. Just use the state database version and you're good. The exact name rule exists for a reason - to prevent confusion in searches.

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

Before you refile, double-check what name is actually on the loan agreement and security agreement. Sometimes the borrower signs docs with one version but their legal entity name is different. You want to make sure your UCC matches both the state database AND your underlying loan docs or you could have perfection issues down the road.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

Good point. The loan agreement has it without the comma but their articles of incorporation definitely show the comma. This is exactly the kind of mess that makes me nervous about the whole filing.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

Had this exact situation last month with a client. Used Certana.ai's document checker tool - you just upload your charter docs and UCC-1 as PDFs and it instantly flags any name inconsistencies between them. Saved me from filing with the wrong version. Super helpful for catching these mismatches before they become rejections.

0 coins

Never heard of that tool but sounds useful. How accurate is it with punctuation differences?

0 coins

Carmen Vega

•

The blueline UCC system is notorious for being picky about names. I always pull the entity's good standing certificate before filing just to be 100% sure. Takes an extra day but prevents these headaches. Also make sure you're checking the RIGHT entity - sometimes there are multiple similar names registered.

0 coins

This is smart. I learned this the hard way after filing against 'Johnson Construction LLC' when it should have been 'Johnson Construction Company LLC'. Had to refile and explain to the client why their lien wasn't perfected on time.

0 coins

Zoe Stavros

•

Ouch that's rough. Did you end up with priority issues because of the delay?

0 coins

Thankfully no, but it was close. The borrower didn't take any other debt during that window but it could have been bad.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

Am I the only one who thinks this exact name requirement is ridiculous? Like, everyone knows what company we're talking about whether there's a comma or not. The UCC system should be more flexible about obvious variations.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

I get the frustration but the exact name rule actually protects everyone. Imagine trying to do UCC searches if there were multiple 'acceptable' versions of every company name. It would be chaos.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

Plus it forces people to be precise with their entity formation and maintenance. If companies kept their names consistent across all filings, this wouldn't be an issue.

0 coins

Jamal Harris

•

Fair points I guess. Still annoying when you're dealing with deadline pressure though.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

Quick question - when you refile, are you planning to terminate the rejected UCC-1 first or just let it sit? I always wonder about the cleanest approach for these situations.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

If it was rejected, there's nothing to terminate. The filing never took effect so it's like it never existed. Just file the correct version fresh.

0 coins

Exactly. Rejected filings don't create any lien records, so no termination needed. Just start over with the right name.

0 coins

I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and the name precision thing still catches people off guard. Pro tip: always do a test search in the UCC database using the exact name you plan to file under. If it doesn't pull up the debtor's existing records, something's wrong with your name format.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

That's brilliant advice. Never thought to do a test search first but it makes total sense.

0 coins

Do you search under both the debtor name and any trade names they might use? Sometimes companies do business under different names.

0 coins

Good question. For UCC purposes, you generally want the legal entity name, not trade names. But yes, I check both to understand the full picture of how they operate.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

Just dealt with something similar and ended up using that Certana thing someone mentioned earlier. Uploaded my articles of incorporation and the UCC-1 draft, and it immediately showed the name discrepancy. Really simple to use - just drag and drop PDFs and it does the comparison automatically. Definitely helped me avoid the rejection you got.

0 coins

How long does the analysis take? Sometimes I'm filing right at deadline and don't have time for extra steps.

0 coins

Sofia Torres

•

It's basically instant. Takes maybe 30 seconds to upload and analyze. Way faster than calling the state to verify names or digging through corporate records manually.

0 coins

Ava Martinez

•

Update us when you get the corrected filing through! I'm curious if they process the resubmission faster since it's a correction of their rejection. Some states are better about that than others.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

Will do! Planning to refile tomorrow morning with the comma version. Fingers crossed it goes through without any more issues.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

Good luck! Usually corrections go smoother than initial filings in my experience.

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

This whole thread is why I always include a UCC name verification step in my loan closing checklist. Too many ways for this to go wrong if you're not systematic about it.

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

Smart approach. Do you have a standard form or process you use for that verification?

0 coins

QuantumQuasar

•

Nothing fancy - just a checklist that includes pulling current corporate standing, comparing to loan docs, and doing a preliminary UCC search. Catches most issues before filing.

0 coins

One more thing to consider - make sure your collateral description is solid too while you're refiling. I've seen people fix the name issue only to get rejected again for vague collateral language.

0 coins

Yara Sayegh

•

Good reminder. What's the most common collateral description mistake you see?

0 coins

Usually being too generic. Like just saying 'equipment' when they should specify 'manufacturing equipment' or 'office equipment' or whatever. The more specific the better.

0 coins

Also seen people mess up the 'all assets' filings by not being clear about what categories they mean. Specificity is key.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today