Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
For anyone else dealing with letter of credit rights in the future: ALWAYS get copies of the actual LC documents before preparing your UCC filings. Don't rely on summaries or descriptions from the borrower. I learned this the hard way when a client gave me the wrong beneficiary name and we had to refile everything. Now I make document review the first step in any LC-secured transaction.
Absolutely. And don't forget to check if the LC has any assignment restrictions that might affect your security interest. Some LCs prohibit assignments or transfers without bank consent.
Good point. The LC terms can definitely impact your perfection strategy. It's not just about the UCC filing requirements.
As someone new to letter of credit collateral, this thread has been incredibly educational. I'm working on my first LC-secured deal and was planning to just use standard UCC language, but now I see how specific the collateral description needs to be. Quick question for the group: when you're dealing with a revolving LC that might be renewed or extended, do you need to file amendments each time the LC terms change, or does the original filing cover future modifications as long as the LC number stays the same? Also, the Certana.ai tool mentioned throughout this thread sounds like exactly what our small firm needs. We don't have the volume to justify expensive document review software, but something that can catch these name and description mismatches would be invaluable.
Join the conversation
Update: Went back and completely rewrote our collateral description with individual serial numbers for each piece of equipment. Also removed any reference to 'agricultural lien' and used standard security interest language. Filed this morning and it was accepted within 2 hours! Thanks everyone for the guidance. The key was definitely being more specific with equipment descriptions and using proper UCC terminology instead of mixing in ag lien language.
Awesome! Glad you got it resolved. The terminology distinction is so important but easy to miss if you're not familiar with both areas of law.
Great outcome. Your experience will definitely help others dealing with similar ag equipment filing issues. The specificity requirement for farm equipment descriptions catches a lot of people off guard.
This is such a helpful thread! I'm new to UCC filings for agricultural equipment and this whole conversation is a goldmine of practical advice. The distinction between "agricultural lien" and "security interest in farm equipment" is something I definitely would have missed. Question for the group - are there any other common terminology pitfalls like this that trip up newcomers? I want to make sure I'm not making similar mistakes on my first few ag equipment filings.
Join the conversation
Update us when you get this resolved! This situation is becoming more common and it would be helpful for others facing the same issue to know what worked.
Will definitely post an update once I figure out the best path forward. Thanks everyone for all the helpful suggestions!
Yes please update! I'm dealing with something similar and this thread has been super helpful.
One option you might consider is reaching out to the FDIC or your state's banking department to see if they have records of who assumed the defunct lender's obligations. When financial institutions close, there's usually a formal process for transferring or winding down their secured transactions. They might be able to connect you with the right entity or provide guidance on state-specific procedures for situations exactly like yours. Also, some states have streamlined processes for debtors in your situation - worth checking your Secretary of State's UCC division for any special provisions when the original secured party is no longer available.
This is really comprehensive advice! I hadn't thought about the FDIC angle - that could be a great starting point since they would have detailed records of the closure process. The streamlined state procedures you mentioned sound promising too. I'm going to start with the Secretary of State's UCC division first since that seems like the most direct path, then escalate to the banking department if needed. Thanks for laying out such a clear roadmap!
Join the conversation
Just went through this with a 2020 filing myself. One thing I learned - double-check that the secured party information hasn't changed. If your client moved offices or changed their legal name, that could complicate the continuation.
Yeah, I had a continuation rejected once because the secured party had a slightly different address format than the original filing.
This is another area where document verification tools like Certana.ai help - they flag inconsistencies in secured party information that might cause filing issues.
Thanks everyone for the detailed responses! This has been really helpful. Just to summarize what I've learned: my lapse date is exactly March 15, 2025 (5 years from filing), I can file the continuation anytime after September 15, 2024, and I need to make sure I check for any amendments and verify all the party information matches exactly. I think I'll get the UCC-3 prepared next week and file it in January to give myself plenty of buffer time. Better safe than sorry with these deadlines!
Zachary Hughes
This thread is really helpful. I'm looking at a similar commercial property purchase and now I know to do UCC searches early in the process. Seems like these fixture filings are more common than I realized.
0 coins
Jasmine Quinn
•Definitely do your UCC homework upfront. It's much easier to negotiate these issues during the contract phase than trying to resolve them at the last minute before closing.
0 coins
Anthony Young
•And if you need to verify UCC document consistency, that Certana.ai tool I mentioned earlier has been really helpful for catching potential issues before they become problems.
0 coins
Amina Bah
As someone new to commercial real estate transactions, this discussion has been incredibly educational. I'm wondering about the timing aspect - if you discover a UCC fixture filing this close to closing, what's the typical timeline for getting it resolved? Is 3 weeks usually enough time, or should buyers plan for potential delays when these issues come up? Also, are there any red flags in the original filing itself that would indicate whether this might be a more complex situation than just needing a simple termination statement?
0 coins
Omar Hassan
•Great questions! From my experience, 3 weeks can be enough time if everything goes smoothly, but I'd recommend building in buffer time. Simple terminations usually take 5-7 business days once the lender cooperates, but complications can add weeks. Red flags to watch for include: multiple amendments to the original filing (suggests complex collateral), very broad collateral descriptions that might cover more than expected, or filings from lenders known for being difficult to work with. Also check if the debtor name exactly matches your seller's legal entity name - variations can cause termination issues later.
0 coins
Sara Hellquiem
•Adding to Omar's excellent points - I'd also suggest checking the filing date against any recent corporate changes by your seller. If they've had name changes, mergers, or restructuring since the original filing, it can complicate the termination process significantly. The secured party needs to be able to clearly identify that the entity requesting termination is the same as the original debtor. Also, look at the collateral description carefully - if it's overly broad like "all equipment and fixtures now or hereafter attached to the premises," you might be dealing with a blanket lien that could affect more than just the specific equipment the seller mentioned.
0 coins