Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Bottom line - UCC lien filings are standard practice for equipment loans. They protect the lender's interest without significantly restricting your brother's business operations, as long as he makes payments as agreed. The filing process is typically handled by the lender with minimal involvement from you. Just make sure all the paperwork is accurate and you understand any restrictions on selling or disposing of the collateral.
Thanks everyone! This has been incredibly helpful. I feel much more confident about moving forward with the loan now that I understand what the UCC filing actually means.
Glad we could help! Equipment financing with UCC filings is pretty routine once you understand the basics. Your brother's business should do well with the right equipment.
One additional consideration for construction equipment - make sure you understand how the UCC filing affects insurance requirements. Most lenders will require comprehensive coverage on all listed collateral, and they'll typically want to be named as loss payee on the policy. If equipment gets damaged or stolen, insurance proceeds go to the lender first to protect their interest. This is separate from your regular business liability coverage, so factor those premiums into your financing costs when evaluating the loan.
That's a great point about insurance! I hadn't even thought about how the UCC filing would affect our insurance requirements. Do you know if this type of coverage is typically expensive for construction equipment? We're already looking at pretty tight margins for the first year.
Join the conversation
As someone new to commercial lending, this thread has been incredibly educational! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I need to file UCCs for multiple equipment loans across different states. One question I have - when using filing services, do they typically provide confirmation of successful filing immediately, or is there a delay? Also, for equipment that might be moved between states during the loan term (like construction equipment), do you need to file in multiple states upfront or can you amend later when the equipment relocates? The multi-state aspect seems like it could get complicated quickly, especially with different state requirements and fees.
Great questions! Most professional filing services provide same-day electronic confirmation when filings are accepted by the state systems, usually within a few hours. For the multi-state equipment issue, you typically file where the equipment is located at the time of the transaction. If equipment moves permanently to another state, you generally have 4 months to file a new UCC in the destination state to maintain perfection (this varies by state though). For mobile equipment like construction machinery, some lenders file in multiple states upfront if they know the equipment will be moving around regularly. It's definitely more complex than single-state deals, but filing services that specialize in this can help navigate the different state requirements and timing rules.
Adding to Harper's excellent response - I'd strongly recommend working with a filing service that has experience with mobile equipment. They can set up a monitoring system to track when equipment crosses state lines and automatically handle the continuation filings. For construction equipment specifically, some states have special provisions for "mobile goods" that can simplify the process. Also worth noting that the 4-month rule Harper mentioned can vary - some states give you only 60 days, so it's critical to know the specific requirements for each jurisdiction where your equipment might operate. The upfront cost of filing in multiple states is usually worth it for peace of mind, especially on a $340K deal where you can't afford gaps in perfection.
This thread has covered the authorization aspects really well, but I'd add one practical tip from my experience with equipment financing - always request a certified copy of the UCC filing from the secretary of state once it's processed. Many lenders just rely on the filing service's confirmation, but having the official state-certified copy in your loan file is crucial for enforcement later. Also, for SBA deals specifically, make sure your UCC filing is coordinated with any required personal guaranty UCCs - sometimes the personal and business filings need to be done simultaneously to avoid gaps in coverage. The SBA has specific requirements about perfection timing that can affect the guarantee, so don't just assume your business UCC filing alone is sufficient.
Excellent point about getting certified copies! I learned this the hard way when we had to enforce a security interest and the court wanted official documentation, not just our filing service confirmation. The certified copy also helps if there are ever questions about the exact filing date or content. On the SBA coordination aspect - that's something I hadn't considered but makes total sense. Do you typically file the personal guaranty UCCs at the same time as the business equipment UCC, or is there a specific sequence that works best? I'm assuming the timing could affect lien priority if there are other creditors involved.
Join the conversation
As someone new to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly educational! I was actually researching these same form numbers after seeing them referenced online and was about to ask my supervisor about them. Now I understand they're statutory sections, not actual filing forms. It's concerning how much misinformation is out there - I almost made the same mistake. For anyone else who's new to this area, it sounds like the key takeaway is to stick with standard UCC-1 financing statements and always verify debtor names match organizational documents exactly. Thanks everyone for clearing this up!
Welcome to the community! You're absolutely right to be cautious about this kind of misinformation. I've been doing UCC work for a few years now and I still see these pseudo-legal references pop up regularly online. The fact that you thought to verify before acting shows good instincts. One thing I'd add to the advice here - when you're starting out, it's also worth familiarizing yourself with your state's specific UCC filing requirements since there can be small variations in procedures and fees between states, even though the underlying law is uniform.
As a newcomer to this community, I found this discussion extremely valuable! I'm just starting to work with secured transactions and was confused by some online references I'd seen to these same UCC section numbers. It's alarming how much misinformation exists that could lead people to file incorrect documents. The clarification that UCC 1-308 and UCC 1-103 are statutory provisions, not filing forms, is crucial. I appreciate everyone taking the time to explain the proper UCC-1 filing process and emphasize the importance of exact debtor name matching. This kind of detailed, practical guidance from experienced professionals is exactly what newcomers like me need to avoid costly mistakes. Thank you all for creating such an informative thread!
Welcome to the community, Demi! This thread really highlights how important it is to have reliable sources for UCC guidance. I'm also relatively new to secured transactions and found myself going down some confusing rabbit holes online before finding this community. The experienced professionals here have been incredibly helpful in cutting through the noise. One thing I've learned is to always cross-reference any unusual form numbers or filing requirements with official state resources or established legal references before proceeding. It's better to ask questions and verify than to assume something is correct just because you found it online. Thanks for sharing your perspective as another newcomer - it's reassuring to know others are navigating the same learning curve!
Join the conversation
One more vote for UCC-3 amendment form. I've been doing secured transaction work for over a decade and UCC1-104 is not a thing. Your paralegal probably just had a brain freeze or was thinking of something else entirely. The good news is that UCC-3 amendments are straightforward in Texas as long as you get the debtor name right and reference the correct original filing number.
Exactly. Sometimes people overcomplicate these filings when the process is actually pretty standard across the board.
That's reassuring. I was making this way more complicated than it needed to be.
I'm a newcomer here but deal with UCC filings regularly in my work. Just wanted to confirm what everyone else is saying - there's definitely no such thing as a UCC1-104 form. The standard UCC forms are pretty universal: UCC-1 for initial filings, UCC-3 for amendments/continuations/terminations, and UCC-5 for corrections. Texas follows this same system. Your paralegal might have been looking at an old document or confused it with some internal office numbering. For adding collateral to your restaurant equipment financing, you'll definitely want the UCC-3 amendment form. Make sure to include your original filing number and match the debtor name exactly as it appears on the original UCC-1. The Texas Secretary of State's online system is pretty user-friendly once you're using the correct form.
Alana Willis
This thread is making me grateful I mostly deal with continuation filings and terminations. The recording tax on new UCC-1 filings in Tennessee sounds like a major headache. At least continuations are just the standard fee without all these additional taxes.
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
•Yeah, continuations are much simpler. Just the $15 filing fee and you're done. No recording tax calculations or collateral value assessments to worry about.
0 coins
Sara Unger
•I wish I could use Certana.ai's verification tool on my continuations too. Sometimes I worry about debtor name changes or other issues that might affect the continuation, but it's mainly designed for UCC-1 and amendment filings.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Rashid
Welcome to the Tennessee UCC recording tax club! I just went through this same nightmare last month with a $450 surprise fee on agricultural equipment financing. What really got me was that my paralegal had filed dozens of UCCs in other states without any issues, but Tennessee's system is completely different. The recording tax seems to kick in around the $150K collateral value threshold, and like others mentioned, the way you describe the equipment matters a lot. I ended up having to explain the unexpected cost to my client after the fact, which was embarrassing. Now I always call the Tennessee SOS directly before filing anything over $100K just to get a ballpark estimate of total costs. Their phone system is terrible like someone mentioned, but if you can get through, they'll at least tell you if your collateral description is likely to trigger the higher tax brackets.
0 coins