Confused about scope of UCC coverage - what's actually included vs excluded?
I'm working on a complex financing deal and getting mixed signals about what falls under UCC scope. We're dealing with a manufacturer who has equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, but also some real estate fixtures and intellectual property. The attorney keeps going back and forth on what needs UCC-1 filings versus other recording methods. I thought I understood the scope of UCC but now I'm second-guessing everything. Can someone break down what's definitively covered under UCC Article 9 versus what requires different perfection methods? This is holding up our closing and I need to get clarity fast.
39 comments
Join the conversation
Dylan Campbell
UCC Article 9 covers personal property and fixtures, but NOT real estate itself. Equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, deposit accounts, general intangibles (including most IP) - those all fall under UCC scope. Real estate mortgages are separate. Fixtures can be tricky because they straddle both worlds.
0 coins
StarStrider
•So the manufacturing equipment bolted to the floor would need a fixture filing? Or regular UCC-1?
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•Depends on your state's fixture laws. In most states, if it's so attached to real estate that removing it would damage the property, it's a fixture and needs a fixture UCC-1 filed in real estate records.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
The scope confusion trips up everyone. Generally: tangible personal property (equipment, inventory), intangible personal property (accounts, payment intangibles, general intangibles), and certain fixtures = UCC territory. Real estate, vehicles with certificate of title, most deposit accounts = outside UCC scope.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Wait, I thought deposit accounts WERE covered under UCC now?
0 coins
Sofia Torres
•Deposit accounts are covered as collateral under Article 9, but perfection is by control agreement with the bank, not by filing UCC-1. Common misconception.
0 coins
StarStrider
•This is exactly the kind of detail that's causing confusion in our deal. The IP includes patents and trademarks - those need UCC-1 or federal registration?
0 coins
Ava Martinez
Had a similar scope issue last month. Ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool to upload all our collateral schedules and security agreements. It flagged several items where we were using wrong perfection methods - saved us from filing errors that could have voided our security interest.
0 coins
StarStrider
•How does that work exactly? Just upload the docs and it tells you what's wrong?
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•Pretty much. Upload your security agreement and proposed UCC-1, it cross-checks everything and highlights inconsistencies or perfection method mismatches. Way faster than manual review.
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
Intellectual property scope is particularly messy. Patents and trademarks CAN be UCC collateral but federal registration might be required for perfection depending on the IP type. Copyright is usually just UCC filing. Software and trade secrets are general intangibles under UCC.
0 coins
StarStrider
•The software licenses are what's really confusing me. Some are exclusive, some aren't. Does that change UCC coverage?
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
•License rights are usually general intangibles covered by UCC regardless of exclusivity. But check if the license agreement has anti-assignment clauses that could limit your security interest.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•ugh why is IP so complicated with UCC filings?? seems like every deal has some weird edge case
0 coins
Zainab Omar
SCOPE OF UCC IS PERSONAL PROPERTY PERIOD. If you can move it without damaging real estate = personal property = UCC-1. If it's stuck to the building = fixture = special fixture filing. Real estate = mortgage not UCC. Vehicles with titles = title perfection not UCC. This isn't rocket science people!!!
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
•Not quite that simple though. Consumer goods have different rules, and some intangibles require special perfection methods even though they're UCC collateral.
0 coins
Zainab Omar
•OK fine but the basic scope question isn't that hard. Personal property vs real property. Everything else is just details.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
For your deal specifically - equipment UCC-1, inventory UCC-1, A/R UCC-1, fixtures either fixture UCC-1 or regular UCC-1 depending on attachment level, IP probably UCC-1 with possible federal filings for patents/trademarks. Sounds like you need separate real estate mortgages too.
0 coins
StarStrider
•That matches what I was thinking. The delay is coming from the attorney wanting to research the fixture classification for some of the equipment.
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
•If timing is critical, you could file broad UCC-1 now and amend later if needed. Better to have some perfection than none while you sort out fixture details.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Good point. I'll suggest that approach.
0 coins
Paolo Longo
Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and scope questions still come up regularly. The key is understanding that UCC Article 9 creates a comprehensive system for personal property security interests, but it doesn't cover everything. Real estate, motor vehicles, and some specialized assets have their own perfection systems.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
•What about aircraft? I always forget where those fall.
0 coins
Paolo Longo
•Aircraft are federal FAA registration, not UCC. Same with ships over certain tonnage.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Thankfully no aircraft in this deal! Just trying to get the basics right.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
I ran into scope issues on a recent deal too. Used Certana.ai's verification tool and it caught that we were trying to perfect some collateral types the wrong way. Really helped clarify what belonged in the UCC-1 versus what needed other filings.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Seems like that tool is getting mentioned a lot. Might be worth checking out.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•Yeah it's pretty handy for complex deals where you're not sure about perfection methods. Saves time and reduces errors.
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
The scope of UCC is actually broader than people think. It covers most personal property transactions, but the perfection methods vary. Filing UCC-1 is just one way to perfect. Control agreements, possession, automatic perfection - all part of the UCC system even if they don't involve filing.
0 coins
Javier Cruz
•True, but for most commercial deals filing UCC-1 is the main perfection method you'll use.
0 coins
StarStrider
•In our case it's mostly filing with maybe some control agreements for the deposit accounts.
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
•Sounds right. Just remember that deposit account control agreements are required for perfection, not optional.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
Bottom line on UCC scope: if it's personal property used as collateral, UCC probably applies. How you perfect the security interest might vary (filing, control, possession) but it's still within UCC's scope. Real estate and titled vehicles are the main exceptions.
0 coins
StarStrider
•That's a helpful way to think about it. Thanks everyone for the clarification. I think we can move forward now.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•Good luck with your closing!
0 coins
Ethan Moore
•Just jumping in as someone new to UCC - this thread has been super helpful! I'm working on my first secured transaction and was totally confused about the scope too. The "personal property = UCC, real estate = separate" rule seems like a good starting point, even though there are obviously exceptions and complications.
0 coins
Zara Shah
•Welcome to the UCC world! That's exactly the right starting framework. Once you get comfortable with the basic personal property vs real estate distinction, you can start learning about the specific perfection methods for different collateral types. The devil is always in the details, but having that foundation makes everything else much clearer.
0 coins
Lauren Zeb
Great discussion here! I'm also relatively new to UCC filings and this scope question comes up constantly in my practice. One thing I've learned is that when you're unsure about fixture classification (like with that manufacturing equipment), many practitioners will file both a regular UCC-1 and a fixture filing to be safe - it's redundant but ensures you're covered either way. The filing fees are usually worth the peace of mind, especially on time-sensitive deals. Also seeing multiple mentions of Certana.ai here - might be worth exploring tools like that when you're dealing with complex collateral schedules.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•That's really smart advice about the dual filing approach for fixtures! I hadn't thought about doing both regular and fixture UCC-1s when classification is unclear. Given that this is such a common source of confusion and delay, it seems like a small price to pay for certainty. The Certana.ai tool also sounds like it could be a game-changer for someone like me who's still learning all the nuances of what collateral goes where. Thanks for sharing your experience - it's reassuring to know other practitioners run into these same scope questions regularly.
0 coins