Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
The NY UCC search system has definitely improved over the years but still has issues during peak usage. For your acquisition, I'd recommend doing searches at different times and keeping screenshots of your results for documentation.
Documentation is key. Make sure you can prove you did comprehensive searches in case issues come up later.
Screenshots are good but certified search results are even better for legal documentation.
For NY UCC searches during acquisition due diligence, I'd strongly recommend running parallel searches using multiple approaches. The state portal issues are well-documented, but you can't rely on just one method for something this critical. I typically do initial searches on the NY SOS portal during off-peak hours, then cross-reference with commercial databases, and finally get certified search results directly from the Secretary of State for final documentation. Also make sure you're searching not just the target company's exact legal name but all variations, DBAs, and any predecessor entities. The name matching in NY is extremely literal - even a missing comma can cause you to miss filings. Given the equipment collateral you mentioned, missing a perfected security interest could be devastating to your deal structure.
This is excellent advice. The parallel search approach makes so much sense for high-stakes deals. I'm curious about the predecessor entity searches - how far back do you typically go when looking for entities that might have been merged or restructured? Our target has gone through several corporate reorganizations over the past decade.
Join the conversation
Last resort option - have your client threaten to move all their banking business elsewhere if the subordination isn't approved. Banks hate losing entire relationships over one transaction, especially if the client has multiple accounts and good payment history.
True, but if they're being completely unreasonable about a straightforward subordination on a well-secured asset, what's the relationship worth anyway? Sometimes you have to be willing to walk.
I'll keep that as the final option if everything else fails. Don't want to burn bridges unless absolutely necessary, but good to know it's on the table.
One more verification step before you go too far down this path - double-check that the UCC-1 filing is actually valid and enforceable. I've seen cases where subordination fights turned out to be unnecessary because the original UCC had fatal defects in the debtor name or collateral description. Upload both the UCC search results and the subordination docs to Certana.ai to verify everything aligns properly before spending more time battling the original lender.
Exactly what I was getting at earlier - document verification catches these issues before they waste everyone's time. Better to know now if the original UCC-1 has problems that affect the subordination process.
Great point about verifying the original UCC-1 first! I've seen situations where banks get defensive about subordination requests when they know their original filing has issues. Running the verification might reveal why they're being so uncooperative - could save a lot of time and effort.
Join the conversation
This Tesla/SolarCity situation has been a nightmare for everyone in solar financing. I've heard some lenders just filed blanket amendments adding Tesla Energy Operations as an additional debtor on all their SolarCity filings, even if it wasn't technically necessary. Better safe than sorry with that much collateral value.
That's probably the safest approach. Filing fees are cheaper than losing perfection. Thanks for all the advice everyone - sounds like amendments are the way to go.
Good luck! Corporate acquisitions in renewable energy financing are always messy but you'll get through it.
I went through something very similar with a different solar company acquisition last year. The key is to act quickly - corporate restructuring can create gaps in perfection that other creditors might exploit. For your situation, I'd recommend doing a quick corporate search on both SolarCity Corporation and Tesla Energy Operations to confirm the relationship, then file UCC-3 amendments adding Tesla Energy Operations as an additional debtor on all your filings. Yes, it's expensive, but losing perfection on $2.8M in collateral is way more expensive. Also, since you mentioned fixture filings, make sure to check if you need to record amendments in the real estate records too - some counties require it for ground-mounted systems. The peace of mind is worth the filing fees.
This is really solid advice! I'm new to UCC filings but dealing with a similar situation with equipment financing. Quick question - when you say "adding Tesla Energy Operations as an additional debtor," do you use a UCC-3 amendment or assignment form? And roughly what did the filing fees run you for multiple amendments? Trying to budget for this kind of cleanup work.
Join the conversation
Another tip for GA UCC forms - if you're doing a lot of filings, consider setting up a prepaid account. Saves time at checkout and you get a small discount on filing fees.
How much of a discount are we talking about?
I think it's like $2 per filing. Not huge but adds up if you're doing dozens of filings.
As someone new to UCC filings, this thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm working on my first Georgia UCC filing for a small business loan and was completely overwhelmed by all the form options on the SOS website. The electronic filing system sounds like the way to go - less room for manual errors and instant feedback. Quick question though: for a standard equipment loan where the collateral is clearly personal property (not attached to real estate), is there anything special I need to consider beyond the standard UCC-1 requirements? The borrower is an LLC if that matters for the debtor name formatting.
Esmeralda Gómez
been there with equipment financing headaches. at least you're being proactive about checking. most people don't even know these exist until they cause problems
0 coins
Sofía Rodríguez
•yeah I wish someone had explained this stuff to me when I first got the loan. financial literacy is not taught well in this country
0 coins
Klaus Schmidt
•so true. the whole UCC system is like this secret world that affects your business but nobody tells you about it
0 coins
Yara Nassar
Also worth noting that if you're planning to get another loan, many lenders will do their own UCC search as part of due diligence anyway. So even if you find an active filing, it doesn't automatically disqualify you - they'll just want to understand the terms and make sure there's no conflict with what they're financing. Some lenders are okay with subordinate liens depending on the collateral involved.
0 coins