Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
OP, I'd seriously consider postponing the closing until you can get definitive documentation. $180K is too much money to risk on unclear lien status. Better to delay than deal with a surprise lien claim later.
Smart move. I've seen too many deals go sideways because someone rushed through lien verification.
Liam Mendez
•Definitely get the termination paperwork first. And maybe run it through one of those document verification services to make sure everything matches up correctly before closing.
Update us on what you find out! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Kansas and curious how Missouri handles these discrepancies.
Will do. Going to demand the termination documents tomorrow and if they can't produce them, I'm walking away from this deal.
Smart call. Trust your instincts when something doesn't add up with UCC searches.
Join the conversation
NebulaKnight
The key with blanket liens is being descriptive enough without being too specific. Try 'all equipment, machinery, tools, and fixtures used in debtor's [type of business] operations, whether now owned or hereafter acquired.' That usually covers the bases.
Ethan Moore
•That's helpful. Our client is in manufacturing so I could specify that business type.
NebulaKnight
•Perfect. Manufacturing is specific enough to satisfy most filing offices while still giving you comprehensive coverage.
Make sure you're not mixing up blanket liens with floating liens. Blanket liens cover specific types of collateral broadly, while floating liens cover changing inventory. For equipment financing, you definitely want a blanket lien approach.
Ethan Moore
•We're definitely talking about a blanket lien. The equipment isn't changing, we just want to cover all of it without listing every individual piece.
Good, just wanted to make sure. The terminology gets confusing and using the wrong approach can cause problems.
Join the conversation
Paloma Clark
Have you considered using one of those UCC monitoring services? They usually catch filings that don't show up in regular searches because they use different search methods. Might be worth signing up for a trial to see if they have the filing you're looking for.
Which services do you recommend? I've been thinking about getting a monitoring service but there are so many options.
Raul Neal
•I've had good luck with Certana.ai for document verification. You can upload your filing documents and it will flag any discrepancies or missing connections. Saved me from missing a critical amendment that wasn't showing up in standard searches.
Jenna Sloan
Massachusetts is notorious for this. I always do searches in multiple states when doing due diligence because sometimes companies file in their state of incorporation instead of where they're physically located. Have you checked if this company is incorporated in a different state?
They're incorporated in Massachusetts but do have operations in Connecticut and Rhode Island. I should probably search those states too just to be thorough.
Definitely check Connecticut. I've seen cases where banks filed there by mistake thinking it would cover Massachusetts operations too.
Join the conversation
Amara Okafor
UPDATE: Finally got through at 5:30am this morning! Found one existing UCC-1 filing from 2019 that's still active. Looks like it's on different equipment though based on the collateral description. Going to double-check with Certana.ai to make sure there aren't any name variations or additional liens I missed before proceeding with our filing.
Glad the early morning approach worked! Certana will definitely catch any variations you might have missed in the manual search.
Ethan Clark
•At least you got through! Still can't believe we have to work around the system like this in 2025.
For future reference, the NH SOS usually posts system maintenance schedules on their website. Worth checking before important deadlines. Also, they're supposedly upgrading to a new portal system sometime this year, though they've been saying that for two years now...
Where on the website do they post maintenance schedules? I looked but couldn't find anything.
It's usually buried in the "announcements" section. Not always up to date though.
Pedro Sawyer
Update: I found the issue! There was indeed a spacing problem in how the debtor name was entered. The filing shows "ACME Manufacturing LLC" but should have been "ACME Manufacturing, LLC" per our corporate documents. Now I need to figure out if this requires a UCC-3 amendment.
0 coins
Beatrice Marshall
•Good catch. That comma could definitely matter for search purposes and legal name accuracy.
0 coins
Melina Haruko
•This is why I always triple-check names against formation documents before filing. But mistakes happen.
0 coins
Dallas Villalobos
Thanks everyone for the help! Going to file the UCC-3 amendment to correct the name and will definitely be more careful with exact name formatting on future filings. The PA search system quirks are noted for next time.
0 coins
Reina Salazar
•Smart move on the amendment. Always better to fix these things proactively.
0 coins
Saanvi Krishnaswami
•Hope this thread helps others dealing with PA UCC search issues. Seems like a common problem.
0 coins