Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just wanted to add that some states have gotten really strict about address formats too. Even if your debtor name is perfect, wrong address formatting can cause rejections. Make sure you're using the exact address format that appears in their business registration.
Address rejections are so annoying! We had one rejected because we put "Street" instead of "St." in the address.
The whole system is way too picky about formatting. These should be substance over form but they treat every character like gospel.
Update us when you get it figured out! I'm dealing with a similar situation and curious what the actual issue turns out to be. These name matching problems are becoming more common and it would help to know the solution.
Will do! Going to try the document verification approach and also get certified copies of the current articles to make sure we have the exact legal name. Fingers crossed the fourth time's the charm.
Good luck! Hope you get it sorted before your closing deadline.
Join the conversation
For anyone else reading this thread, remember that 9-1201 territorial rules can change if the debtor relocates their organization to a different state. You'd need to refile in the new jurisdiction within four months under 9-1207.
We include relocation covenants in our loan agreements for exactly this reason.
Smart practice. The four-month window goes by fast if you're not monitoring.
Update: I ended up using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier and it confirmed Delaware filing. Also caught a small typo in the debtor name that could have caused problems. Thanks everyone for the confirmation on 9-1201!
Glad it helped! Those name verification features are clutch for avoiding rejections.
Nice to see a thread with a clear resolution. Too many of these UCC discussions just trail off without answers.
Join the conversation
Just had another thought - since you mentioned this is construction equipment, make sure your collateral description is broad enough to cover any attachments or accessories that might get added to the machinery during the project. Sometimes borrowers add specialized attachments that could be considered separate collateral.
Exactly. Construction equipment tends to get modified and upgraded during its working life. You want to make sure your security interest covers everything.
I learned this lesson when a borrower added a $50k attachment to an excavator and we hadn't covered accessories in our original UCC. Had to file an amendment to pick up the new collateral.
Sounds like you've got your answer on Delaware filing. One last piece of advice - keep copies of everything including the search results showing your filing was accepted. Sometimes you need to prove perfection timing later and having the documentation makes it much easier.
Definitely will do. Thanks everyone for the help - feeling much more confident about getting this filed correctly now.
Good luck with the filing! Delaware should be straightforward for this type of deal.
Join the conversation
One more thing to consider - make sure your UCC-1 filing covers all the collateral adequately but doesn't inadvertently include contractual obligations that don't create security interests. I've seen deals where over-broad collateral descriptions created confusion later during audits or when trying to release specific assets.
Right, precision in collateral descriptions saves headaches down the road, especially if you need to do partial releases or amendments later.
I learned this the hard way when I had to file multiple UCC-3 amendments to clarify what was actually secured versus what was just referenced in the original filing.
Thanks everyone for all the insights! This has really helped clarify the distinction between what needs UCC filing versus what stays under general contract law. I think I'll separate the equipment security agreement from the service contracts and focus my UCC-1 filing on the tangible assets while keeping the service obligations as standard contractual terms.
That sounds like a solid approach. Just make sure your attorney reviews the final structure to confirm everything is properly covered.
Good plan. The separation approach has worked well for me in similar situations.
Amara Okonkwo
One more thought - if you're still having trouble after getting the official name, you might want to use that Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier to double-check everything before refiling. At this point any extra verification step could save you from another rejection cycle.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•Definitely going to try that. Can't afford another rejection with this timeline.
0 coins
Giovanni Marino
•Smart move. Document verification tools are becoming pretty essential for complex commercial filings like this.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Sayed
Update us when you get it resolved! Always interested to hear how these auto dealer name issues get sorted out since they're so common in floor plan financing.
0 coins
Dylan Hughes
•Good luck! Auto dealer UCC filings are always an adventure but you've got solid advice here.
0 coins
NightOwl42
•Hopefully the 4th time's the charm on this filing!
0 coins