< Back to UCC Document Community

Lilah Brooks

NC UCC search showing weird results - debtor name variations causing issues

Having a nightmare with NC UCC search functionality right now. I'm trying to verify our continuation filing went through properly but the search results are all over the place. When I search for our debtor "Mountain Ridge Equipment LLC" I get some hits, but when I try "Mountain Ridge Equipment, LLC" (with the comma) I get different results entirely. Same filing number should pull up regardless right? This is for a $2.8M equipment financing deal and I need to confirm our UCC-1 continuation was processed correctly before the 5-year deadline hits next month. The original filing was done back in 2020 and I'm getting paranoid about whether the names match exactly between our original UCC-1 and the continuation we just submitted. Anyone else dealing with NC Secretary of State search being finicky about punctuation and spacing in debtor names? I've tried every variation I can think of but I'm worried I'm missing something critical. Our lender is breathing down my neck for confirmation and I can't afford to have a lapsed filing mess up this entire deal.

NC search is notorious for this exact issue. The system is super picky about exact matches. Try searching with just "Mountain Ridge Equipment" without LLC at all - sometimes the entity suffix gets indexed differently.

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

Good call, that actually pulled up more results. Still seeing some inconsistencies though between what shows the continuation vs the original filing.

0 coins

Kolton Murphy

•

Yeah NC's database has quirks. I always search multiple ways - with and without commas, with and without entity designations.

0 coins

Evelyn Rivera

•

This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You upload your original UCC-1 and your continuation filing PDFs and it instantly cross-checks that the debtor names match exactly. Saved me from a huge headache when I discovered our continuation had a typo that would have invalidated the whole thing.

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

Never heard of that service. Does it work with NC filings specifically?

0 coins

Evelyn Rivera

•

Works with any state - it's checking document consistency rather than interfacing with state systems. Really simple, just upload the PDFs and it flags any mismatches.

0 coins

Julia Hall

•

That actually sounds useful for this situation. Manual comparison of documents is where mistakes happen.

0 coins

Kolton Murphy

•

Been filing in NC for 15 years. Their system updated last year and it's been glitchy ever since. For exact name matching, you need to search exactly as it appears on the original filing. No variations, no shortcuts.

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

Problem is I'm not 100% sure how the name appears on the original - it was filed by outside counsel back in 2020.

0 coins

Kolton Murphy

•

That's rough. Can you get a copy of the original filing from counsel? You need to see exactly how they entered the debtor name.

0 coins

Arjun Patel

•

Or pull up the original using the filing number if you have it. That'll show you exactly how the name was entered initially.

0 coins

Jade Lopez

•

OH NO this is my worst nightmare!! I have three continuations due next quarter and now I'm terrified about name matching issues. How do you even verify this stuff properly?? The stress is killing me.

0 coins

Take a deep breath. This is fixable. Get copies of your original filings first, then compare them character by character with your continuations.

0 coins

Evelyn Rivera

•

Seriously consider that Certana tool I mentioned - it'll catch these issues before they become problems. Upload your docs and it does the comparison automatically.

0 coins

Jade Lopez

•

I might have to try that. I can't handle manually checking every single character on these forms.

0 coins

Tony Brooks

•

NC Secretary of State office is the WORST. Their search function is garbage and their customer service acts like it's your fault when their system doesn't work properly. I've wasted hours trying to get simple searches to work.

0 coins

Kolton Murphy

•

It's frustrating but yelling at them won't fix the underlying database issues. We just have to work around their limitations.

0 coins

Tony Brooks

•

I know, I know. But it shouldn't be this hard to search for basic filing information.

0 coins

Here's what works for NC searches: 1) Search by filing number first - that's the most reliable. 2) If searching by name, try the exact name as it appears on incorporation docs. 3) Use wildcard searches with partial names. The system has definitely gotten worse since their upgrade.

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

This is super helpful. I do have the filing number from our original UCC-1 so I'll start there.

0 coins

Yara Campbell

•

Filing number search is definitely the way to go when you have it. Name searches are just too unreliable.

0 coins

Exactly. And once you pull up the original by filing number, you can see exactly how the debtor name was entered for your continuation.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

similar situation last month with a different LLC. Turned out the original filing had "Co." and our continuation had "Company" - small difference but it mattered. Had to file an amendment to correct it.

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

How long did the amendment take to process? I'm worried about timing with our deadline approaching.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

About 2 weeks for NC. Not terrible but definitely something to account for in your timeline.

0 coins

Maya Diaz

•

I ran into this exact issue and ended up using one of those document checking services. Uploaded my UCC-1 and continuation and it immediately flagged that I had "Mountain Ridge Equipment LLC" vs "Mountain Ridge Equipment, LLC" - that comma made all the difference. Saved me from a potential disaster.

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

Was that Certana that someone mentioned earlier? Might be worth the peace of mind at this point.

0 coins

Maya Diaz

•

Yes, that's the one. Super simple to use and caught something I would have missed reviewing manually.

0 coins

Tami Morgan

•

These automated tools are becoming essential for catching human errors in document prep.

0 coins

Rami Samuels

•

Just dealt with this yesterday! NC system is so sensitive to punctuation. I had to search about 6 different ways before I found what I was looking for. The key is being systematic about it - try every reasonable variation.

0 coins

Lilah Brooks

•

That's what I'm doing now. It's tedious but I need to be thorough with this much money on the line.

0 coins

Rami Samuels

•

Exactly. Better to spend the extra time now than deal with a lapsed filing later.

0 coins

Haley Bennett

•

For $2.8M I'd definitely triple check everything. One small mistake and the whole security interest could be worthless.

0 coins

UPDATE: Found the issue! The original filing had "Mountain Ridge Equipment, LLC" (with comma) but our continuation only had "Mountain Ridge Equipment LLC" (no comma). Filed a corrective amendment this morning. Thanks everyone for the help - that Certana service was a lifesaver for confirming the discrepancy.

0 coins

Glad you caught it! That's exactly the kind of detail that causes problems down the road.

0 coins

Evelyn Rivera

•

Perfect example of why document verification tools are so valuable. Human eyes miss these tiny differences all the time.

0 coins

Jade Lopez

•

This thread convinced me to check all my upcoming filings more carefully. Thank you for sharing the solution!

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today