Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Been seeing more of these search vs filing discrepancies lately. Wonder if the state upgraded their search system recently? Anyway, I've started using Certana.ai for all my document verification now - upload the UCC-1 and organizational docs and it catches these types of name mismatches immediately. Would have saved you the stress of discovering this during due diligence.
Yeah, it's become part of my standard workflow now. Catches things that are easy to miss when you're manually comparing documents.
Anita George
Honestly this whole thread is making me paranoid about our existing UCC filings. How many other 'minor' formatting differences might be lurking in our portfolio that could cause problems down the line?
Anita George
•True, but still makes me want to audit our whole portfolio just to be sure.
Sophie Duck
•A periodic lien audit isn't a bad idea regardless. Helps catch continuation deadlines and other issues before they become problems.
Join the conversation
Ethan Brown
Quick question - are you searching under the exact legal name as it appears on the articles of incorporation? Nevada can be really picky about entity designations and punctuation. Even something like 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' can sometimes cause search issues.
Try searching just 'Desert Construction Equipment' without the LLC designation. Sometimes the database indexes entity names differently than they appear on the documents.
Ethan Brown
•Good suggestion. Also worth trying with 'Limited Liability Company' spelled out instead of 'LLC' - I've seen that make a difference in some state databases.
Carmen Ortiz
Following this thread because I'm dealing with something similar in Nevada. Filed a UCC-3 amendment three weeks ago and it's still not showing up in searches. Starting to wonder if their system has some kind of backlog or technical issue.
Carmen Ortiz
•Not yet, but based on the other comments in this thread it sounds like that might be my best bet. Will probably try calling tomorrow morning.
Keep us posted on what you find out. If there's a systematic issue with their database it would be good to know about it.
Join the conversation
Joshua Wood
Check if there are any non-printing characters in the name field. Sometimes when you copy-paste from PDFs or other documents, invisible characters get included that cause formatting rejections.
Joshua Wood
•Try retyping the debtor name manually instead of copy-pasting. That eliminates any hidden characters.
Justin Evans
•This is a really good catch. Non-printing characters from PDF copy-paste cause all sorts of filing issues.
Emily Parker
Update us when you figure it out! I file a lot of Iowa continuations and would love to know what the specific issue was for future reference.
Lucas Adams
•Will do! Trying the Certana document comparison first, then manual retyping if that doesn't catch it.
Ezra Collins
•Definitely interested to hear what resolves this. Iowa formatting issues are always educational for the rest of us.
Join the conversation
Emma Wilson
Another option is to contact the secured party directly and ask for clarification on what equipment is still covered by the lien. Sometimes they're willing to provide a letter stating specific items are released even without filing a formal UCC-3.
Emma Wilson
•Exactly. Most lenders would rather clarify than deal with disputes later. Just make sure to get any agreement in writing.
Malik Thomas
•I tried this approach once and the lender was actually grateful I reached out. Turned out they had released the collateral but never filed the termination.
NeonNebula
Used Certana.ai for a similar FL UCC issue and it caught a discrepancy between the search results and the actual filings that could have cost me big time. The system automatically flagged that a supposed termination was actually just an assignment to another lender.
Sofia Torres
•That's exactly the kind of thing I'm worried about missing. How quickly does it process the documents?
NeonNebula
•Pretty much instant once you upload the PDFs. It gives you a summary of potential issues and inconsistencies to investigate further.
GalaxyGazer
Just be really careful with your debtor name on the addendum - it has to match exactly with what's on the main UCC-1. Even slight variations can cause problems.
0 coins
Oliver Wagner
•This! I had a filing rejected because I used 'Inc.' on the main form and 'Incorporated' on the addendum.
0 coins
Jamal Thompson
•Good catch. I'll make sure everything matches exactly.
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
Update: I used the official addendum form with proper page numbering and references like you all suggested. Also ran it through Certana to double-check everything before submitting. Finally got it accepted! Thanks everyone for the help. The key was using the state-specific addendum format and making sure all the cross-references were correct.
0 coins
Emma Thompson
•Glad the Certana suggestion worked out for you. That tool has saved me so much hassle.
0 coins
Malik Davis
•Thanks for updating us. This thread will help other people with the same issue.
0 coins