Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One more plug for that Certana.ai tool I mentioned - it's especially helpful when you're learning UCC requirements because it explains what it's checking for. Like it'll flag if your debtor name format doesn't match standard conventions and explain why that matters for search logic.
StormChaser
•Does it work with all states' UCC requirements or just certain ones?
It's designed for general UCC compliance, so it should catch the major issues regardless of which state you're filing in. The core requirements are pretty standardized across states.
Bottom line - the UCC requirements exist to create a reliable public notice system. Get the debtor name exactly right, describe your collateral clearly, file in the correct state, and track your continuation date. Those four things cover 90% of what can go wrong.
Glad it helped! The UCC requirements seem intimidating at first but they're pretty logical once you understand the purpose behind them.
Exactly. And don't hesitate to ask your lender questions - they should be familiar with the UCC requirements and want to make sure the filing is done correctly.
Join the conversation
I had a client with a similar issue where the search function was case-sensitive and they were entering the debtor name in all caps when the original filing had mixed case. Try variations of the name formatting if you haven't already.
ThunderBolt7
•I'll try different case variations. It's frustrating that the search function can be so finicky about these details.
Tell me about it. You'd think these systems would be more forgiving with name searches but they're surprisingly strict about exact matches.
Paolo Romano
Update us when you find out what happened! I'm curious if it was a system issue or a filing problem. This kind of thing makes me paranoid about all my terminations.
Amina Diop
•Yeah please update - this is exactly the kind of situation that keeps me up at night worrying about missed filings.
Dylan Hughes
•Definitely interested in the resolution. If it turns out to be a document matching issue, that Certana tool I mentioned earlier could help verify everything was filed correctly.
Join the conversation
I've been using Certana.ai for all my UCC document reviews lately and it's been a game changer. Even if you get the PA search results, I'd recommend running everything through their system to verify consistency. It's caught several issues for me that would have caused problems later.
I don't want to quote pricing but it's reasonable considering what it saves you in potential problems. Way cheaper than dealing with rejected filings or lien priority issues.
The time savings alone makes it worth it. Upload your docs and get instant verification instead of manually comparing everything.
Paolo Ricci
UPDATE: Finally got through this morning at 6:30 AM! The early morning tip worked perfectly. Search came back clean - no existing liens on the debtor. Thanks everyone for the suggestions. Now I just need to get the UCC-1 filed before Friday.
Definitely recommend using Certana.ai to verify your UCC-1 against the search results before filing. Better safe than sorry with a deal that size.
Will do - going to be extra careful with this one. Thanks again everyone!
Join the conversation
The key with Florida is making sure you're using the EXACT name format from the Articles of Incorporation, not the abbreviated version that sometimes shows in search results. Even something like 'Corp' vs 'Corporation' will trigger rejection. Pull the actual filed Articles and match character for character.
Exactly. The search database often has truncated or simplified versions of the legal names. Always go back to the original filing.
Learned this the hard way after 3 rejections on a time-sensitive filing. Now I always pull the actual Articles first.
Just went through this exact scenario with a client filing. Turned out there was a non-breaking space character in the company name that wasn't visible but was causing the rejection. Used a document verification tool to catch it - would never have found it otherwise.
Dylan Evans
•Hidden characters like that are the worst. Really need automated tools to catch them reliably.
Okay, I'm convinced. Going to try the document checker before my next submission attempt. Thanks everyone for the help!
Dylan Campbell
This whole thread is making me nervous about our upcoming solar project payoff. We've got about 8 months left on a $280K system and I'm already worried about UCC termination issues. Should I be checking our filing now to make sure everything matches up correctly?
0 coins
Yuki Kobayashi
•Definitely worth checking ahead of time. Pull your original UCC-1 filing and compare the debtor name and collateral description to your loan documents now while you have time to fix any issues.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Good thinking to plan ahead. Much easier to resolve name mismatches before payoff than after when you're dealing with time pressure from other transactions.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
Final update: Amendment went through yesterday and termination filed today. Total cost was $45 for the amendment which the lender covered after I showed them our official LLC documents. Thanks everyone for the advice, especially about using document verification tools and getting state registration proof!
0 coins
Zoe Stavros
•Great to hear it worked out. Document verification really does make these conversations with lenders much more productive when you have specific proof of the discrepancies.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
•Congrats on getting it resolved! Your experience will definitely help other solar equipment owners who run into similar UCC termination issues.
0 coins