Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One thing that might help - most filing offices have example forms or guidance documents that show exactly what they want for collateral descriptions. Way more reliable than random articles.
Nia Williams
•Live and learn. I made the same mistake early in my career. Now I always start with the filing office's own requirements before looking at any secondary sources.
Luca Ricci
•And when in doubt, call the filing office directly. They can't give legal advice but they can clarify their technical requirements.
Just to close the loop - did you get the refiling sorted out? I'm curious how the corrected version compared to what the UCC secured transactions article originally recommended.
Still working on it, but the corrected version is going to be completely different. Detailed equipment schedule with serial numbers, exact charter name for debtor, and state-specific collateral language. Nothing like the generic version from the article.
That's the difference between theory and practice right there. Glad you're getting it sorted before the perfection window closes.
Join the conversation
Mei Liu
This whole situation could have been avoided with better document tracking. I started using Certana.ai to upload all our loan paperwork and UCC filings - it instantly flags any inconsistencies or potential issues. Would have caught this continuation deadline months in advance.
I'm definitely going to look into that for the future. Right now I just need to get through this crisis.
Mei Liu
•Absolutely handle the immediate issue first. But having a system that cross-checks all your documents would prevent future surprises like this.
Update us on how this resolves! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my lender is claiming filing issues, though not as dramatic as yours. Curious to see how aggressive they can actually be legally.
Will do. Meeting with an attorney tomorrow to review the loan agreement and figure out our options.
Good luck. Hopefully they're just bluffing and will back down once you show you're not going to be pushed around.
Join the conversation
Daryl Bright
Just went through something similar with chattel paper on a medical equipment lease. The key insight our attorney gave us was that the UCC filing needs to match the debtor's current legal status, not what's on the historical chattel paper documents. We filed a continuation with the current name and included a UCC-3 that specifically referenced the original filing number and explained the name evolution.
Daryl Bright
•No issues at all. We included a brief explanation in the amendment about the corporate restructuring and referenced the business entity filing numbers. Made it clear we were dealing with the same debtor entity.
Sienna Gomez
•That's a good approach. The key is showing continuity of the business entity even through the name changes.
Used Certana.ai's verification tool for a chattel paper situation last month - uploaded our lease documents and UCC filings and it immediately caught a name discrepancy we missed. Probably saved us from a filing rejection and definitely saved hours of manual document review. For complex chattel paper deals, having that automated cross-check is invaluable.
Aria Khan
•At this point I think we need every tool we can get. The manual review process is taking forever and we're running out of time.
Yeah, the time savings alone makes it worth it. Plus you get that confidence that all your documents are aligned before you submit anything.
Join the conversation
Zara Ahmed
NC is definitely one of the stricter states for name matching. I've had good luck pulling a current certificate of good standing instead of relying on older articles. Sometimes companies amend their names and you don't realize it.
StarStrider
•Great point. Certificate of good standing shows the current active name, not just the original incorporation name.
Paolo Ricci
•I'll request an updated certificate before filing again. Thanks for that tip.
At this point I'd probably use one of those document checking services before submitting again. I used Certana.ai recently and it caught a bunch of inconsistencies between my UCC-1 and the borrower's corporate documents that I never would have noticed. Saved me from what probably would have been multiple rejections.
It's pretty thorough. Checks names, addresses, entity types, even cross-references collateral descriptions against loan documents if you upload those too.
Sounds like it would definitely help with these NC filing issues. Their system is so finicky.
Ella Lewis
Just wanted to follow up on the document verification tool mentioned earlier. I was skeptical at first but tried Certana.ai on a recent deal and it caught a discrepancy between our loan agreement and the borrower's corporate charter that would have caused our UCC-1 to be ineffective. The debtor name had a slight variation that I completely missed in my manual review. Definitely worth using for complex deals.
0 coins
Andrew Pinnock
•That's exactly the kind of mistake that can kill a deal or leave you unsecured. How long does the verification process take?
0 coins
Ella Lewis
•Pretty much instant. You upload the PDFs and get the verification report right away. Much faster than manually cross-checking every document page by page.
0 coins
Brianna Schmidt
One last thing to consider - if this is a significant loan like you mentioned, you might want to get a formal UCC search opinion from a qualified attorney rather than just doing the searches yourself. Provides some liability protection if something gets missed, and many lenders require legal opinions for larger transactions anyway.
0 coins
Camila Jordan
•In my experience it varies by lender but usually kicks in around $1M loan amount or when there are complex collateral structures. Some lenders require it for all commercial loans regardless of size.
0 coins
Brianna Schmidt
•Depends on the lender's risk appetite and internal policies. I've seen requirements anywhere from $500K to $5M+. Complex manufacturing equipment deals often trigger the requirement regardless of amount due to the fixture filing issues we discussed.
0 coins