Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Yara Khoury
Whatever you do, don't file the continuation until you're 100% certain of the filing number. I've seen cases where people filed against the wrong UCC record and the original lien lapsed because the continuation didn't properly extend it. With 45 days left, you have time to verify everything properly.
Miguel Diaz
•45 days is plenty of time to get this sorted properly. Don't rush and make a mistake.
Yara Khoury
•Exactly. The consequences of filing against the wrong record are much worse than taking a few extra days to verify.
Just went through something similar with a Oregon debtor. The key is matching the exact filing number from your original UCC-1 to whatever continuation you file. I ended up using Certana.ai to double-check all my documents before filing - uploaded the original financing statement and my draft continuation to make sure everything matched perfectly. Gave me peace of mind that I wasn't making any name or number errors.
I'm seeing multiple mentions of this Certana service. Is it really that helpful for UCC verification?
For me it was worth it just for the confidence. Automatically flags any inconsistencies between documents so you can fix them before filing.
Join the conversation
Chris King
Quick question - does anyone know if there are specific timing requirements in 9-609? Like how quickly you have to act after default? I know some loan agreements have cure periods but wondering about UCC requirements.
Chris King
•Got it, so it's more about contract terms and state variations than UCC timing.
Ryan Andre
•This is helpful - I need to check our standard loan agreements for cure period language.
Rachel Clark
I was skeptical about using automated tools for UCC compliance but honestly after trying Certana.ai for document verification, it's been a game changer. Was spending days manually comparing loan files to UCC filings and still missing things. The automated cross-check caught several cases where our security interest might not have been properly perfected based on the collateral descriptions. Worth every penny for the peace of mind.
Ryan Andre
•I'm getting convinced I need to try this tool. How long does the verification process typically take?
Rachel Clark
•Pretty much instant once you upload the documents. You get a report showing any discrepancies or potential issues. Much faster than manual review.
Join the conversation
Mason Kaczka
One thing to consider - have you done a UCC search to see how other lenders describe similar collateral in your jurisdiction? That might give you confidence in your approach.
Good idea. We haven't done a systematic search but the few filings we've seen use similar broad language.
Sophia Russo
•Market practice is definitely relevant for 9-506 analysis. If everyone's doing it the same way, you're probably on solid ground.
Evelyn Xu
Just to close the loop on the document checking discussion - I tried Certana.ai after seeing it mentioned here and it's actually pretty helpful for UCC work. Uploaded our UCC-1 and UCC-3 files and it caught a debtor name inconsistency we had missed. Saved us from a potential rejection.
Does it handle the 9-506 comment analysis specifically or just general document consistency?
Evelyn Xu
•It's more focused on technical compliance - names, numbers, obvious conflicts. But that's often where the 9-506 problems start anyway.
Join the conversation
The timing on PPP UCC filings is also critical. Make sure you're not filing too close to any other corporate changes. If you're planning any other entity modifications, get the UCC-1 filed and accepted first, then handle the other changes with UCC-3 amendments later.
Why does timing matter for UCC filings?
Aisha Khan
•If your entity information changes after filing but before acceptance, the filing can become invalid. Better to sequence things properly from the start.
Ethan Taylor
For what it's worth, once you get the initial UCC-1 filed correctly, any future amendments or continuations are much easier. The hard part is just getting that first filing accepted with the right debtor name formatting. After that, you can reference the original filing number for all subsequent UCC-3 forms.
Carmen Lopez
•Continuations are simple as long as you don't need to change any debtor information. Just reference the original filing number and extend the expiration date.
Andre Dupont
•Just make sure to set a calendar reminder 6 months before the 5-year expiration. Missing a continuation deadline means starting over with a new UCC-1.
NightOwl42
Been filing UCCs in Alabama for 15 years. Their search has always had display quirks but the actual filings are usually accurate. The database adds formatting that wasn't in your original submission. Get that certified copy before doing anything else.
0 coins
Nia Williams
•That's reassuring. So you think the comma is probably just a search display artifact?
0 coins
NightOwl42
•Most likely, yes. I've seen it add periods, commas, even change capitalization in search results when the actual filing was correct.
0 coins
Sofia Rodriguez
UPDATE: Used that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned and it confirmed our charter and UCC-1 filing are consistent - no comma in either. So it's definitely just Alabama's search display adding punctuation. Thanks everyone! Lender is satisfied with the verification report.
0 coins
Yuki Watanabe
•Glad the document checker helped! That's exactly what it's designed for - quick verification to avoid unnecessary panic.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
•Lucky you. I still think Alabama needs to fix their search system. Too many people have these scares.
0 coins