UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Isabella Ferreira

UCC 9307 Jurisdiction Rules - Equipment Moved Between States After Filing

I'm dealing with a complex UCC 9307 situation and need some guidance from anyone who's handled multi-state collateral before. We have a borrower who originally financed construction equipment in Ohio, where we properly filed our UCC-1 last year. The equipment was supposed to stay at their main facility there. Now they've moved several pieces to a project site in Kentucky and plan to keep them there permanently. I'm trying to figure out our perfection status under UCC 9307 - do we need to refile in Kentucky? The equipment has been there for about 3 months now. Our loan documents don't specifically restrict moving collateral between states, but I'm worried about losing perfection if we don't act quickly. Has anyone dealt with similar UCC 9307 jurisdiction issues when collateral gets relocated? I've read the statute but it's not entirely clear how the 4-month rule applies when you're not sure if the move is temporary or permanent.

Nia Thompson

•

Quick question - did your loan agreement require the borrower to notify you before moving the equipment? That could affect your options if they breached a covenant by not telling you about the Kentucky move.

0 coins

Omar Fawaz

•

That's a lesson for next time. We always include a covenant requiring 30 days notice before moving equipment to another state.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

Good practice. Makes it much easier to maintain perfection when you know about moves in advance.

0 coins

Bottom line - file in Kentucky ASAP. You're at 3 months already and UCC 9307 doesn't give you any wiggle room past 4 months. Even if there's some argument that the equipment isn't 'normally located' there yet, it's not worth the risk of losing perfection.

0 coins

You're absolutely right. I'm going to prepare the Kentucky filing this week. Better to be overcautious with UCC 9307 than risk losing our security interest.

0 coins

Exactly. The filing fee is minimal compared to the risk of having an unperfected security interest.

0 coins

Destiny Bryant

UCC equipment purchase financing - debtor name issues on UCC-1

Running into a wall here with our equipment financing deal. We're purchasing $180K worth of construction equipment (excavator and two skid steers) and the lender requires a UCC-1 filing to perfect their security interest. Problem is our business name on the purchase agreement shows 'ABC Construction LLC' but our official LLC filing with the state shows 'ABC Construction, LLC' (with the comma). The equipment dealer says this happens all the time and not to worry, but our lender is being very particular about exact name matches between the purchase docs and the UCC-1. Has anyone dealt with this kind of debtor name mismatch situation? The equipment is supposed to be delivered next week and we can't close without the UCC filing being accepted. Getting conflicting advice on whether we need to amend our LLC paperwork first or if there's a way to handle this at the UCC level. Really need to get this sorted quickly since we have jobs lined up that depend on this equipment.

Update us on how this works out! I'm curious to know what approach you end up taking and whether your state's filing office is flexible on the comma issue. This kind of real-world experience helps everyone learn.

0 coins

Aria Khan

•

Yes please update! We're probably going to face the same issue soon.

0 coins

Everett Tutum

•

Definitely interested in the outcome. These name matching issues seem to be getting more common.

0 coins

Sunny Wang

•

One more thing to consider - make sure your insurance paperwork also matches your legal entity name. Sometimes equipment insurance gets overlooked in these situations but it needs to be consistent with your UCC filing for maximum protection.

0 coins

Melissa Lin

•

This is getting complicated. Wish there was an easier way to make sure all these documents align properly before filing.

0 coins

There actually is - I mentioned Certana.ai earlier but it's worth repeating. You can upload all your docs (LLC certificate, purchase agreement, UCC draft, etc.) and it'll flag any inconsistencies across all of them. Really takes the guesswork out of document alignment.

0 coins

Maya Jackson

New York UCC Lien Search - Debtor Name Mismatch Blocking Results

Running into issues with a New York UCC lien search that's driving me crazy. We're trying to verify existing liens on a commercial borrower before finalizing a secured loan, but the search results keep coming back inconsistent. The debtor's legal name on their articles of incorporation shows 'Metroplex Solutions LLC' but our UCC-1 search in NY's database returns partial matches for 'Metroplex Solutions, LLC' (with comma) and 'Metro-Plex Solutions LLC' (with hyphen). We need to know if there are existing UCC filings that would take priority over our security interest. The loan officer is breathing down my neck because closing is supposed to happen Friday. Has anyone dealt with NY's search system being this finicky about punctuation and spacing in debtor names? I'm worried we're missing critical liens that could affect our collateral position.

Eva St. Cyr

•

NY really needs to update their UCC search system to handle name variations better. Other states have much more intelligent search algorithms that catch obvious variations automatically.

0 coins

Libby Hassan

•

Completely agree. It's 2025 and their system still can't handle basic name variations. So frustrating.

0 coins

Eva St. Cyr

•

Delaware and Texas have much better search systems. NY feels like it's stuck in the 1990s.

0 coins

For future NY UCC lien searches, I always create a checklist of name variations to try: legal name, legal name with comma, without comma, with periods, without periods, with hyphens, without hyphens, abbreviations like 'Corp' vs 'Corporation', etc. Takes time but prevents missed liens.

0 coins

Also include any DBAs or trade names in your checklist. Those get overlooked frequently but can have UCC filings against them.

0 coins

Kaitlyn Otto

•

Smart approach. Documentation is key for showing you did thorough due diligence.

0 coins

Rachel Clark

UCC North Carolina search showing different debtor name - filing validity concerns

Running into a major headache with a UCC North Carolina search discrepancy. Filed a UCC-1 last month for equipment financing on a trucking company, but when I pull up the search results the debtor name appears slightly different than what we have on our loan docs. Original filing shows 'Mountain Ridge Logistics LLC' but our credit agreement lists 'Mountain Ridge Logistics, LLC' with the comma. The search engine seems to be treating these as potentially different entities. Our compliance team is freaking out because this could affect our perfected security interest if there's a name mismatch. Has anyone dealt with similar debtor name variations in NC? The SOS portal accepted the original filing without rejection, but now I'm worried we might have a gap in our lien position. This is a $180K equipment loan so the stakes are pretty high if we're not properly secured.

Before you file an amendment, I'd suggest calling the NC SOS UCC division directly. They can sometimes clarify whether a name variation like this would actually affect your perfection. Might save you the amendment fee if it's not necessary.

0 coins

I don't have it memorized but it should be on their website under the UCC division contacts.

0 coins

I called them about a similar issue once and they were actually really helpful. Definitely worth a try before spending money on an amendment.

0 coins

Alexis Renard

•

Update us on what you find out! I'm curious whether this ends up being a real issue or just a display quirk. Seems like something that could affect a lot of filers if it's a systematic problem with how NC handles punctuation.

0 coins

Rachel Clark

•

Will definitely update once I get more info. Hoping it's just a display issue but want to be thorough.

0 coins

Yeah please keep us posted. This kind of thing is exactly why I'm always nervous about electronic filings.

0 coins

Eli Butler

UCC lien filing bizfile california - debtor name verification nightmare

Been wrestling with a UCC lien filing bizfile california situation for weeks now. My client's equipment financing deal is stuck because the SOS rejected our UCC-1 three times - each time citing debtor name discrepancies with their bizfile records. The equipment manufacturer requires perfected security interest before delivery next month. We've tried matching the exact business name from their Articles of Incorporation, then tried the DBA variation, even attempted the federal tax ID registered name. Each filing gets bounced back with different explanations about name matching requirements. The collateral schedule is solid (specific equipment serial numbers, model descriptions) but can't get past this bizfile name verification hurdle. Anyone dealt with similar UCC lien filing bizfile california rejections? Starting to wonder if there's something in their system causing automatic rejections when cross-referencing bizfile data. This $847K equipment deal is hanging in the balance and my client is getting impatient about the delays.

Tony Brooks

•

Are you using the correct entity type designation? Sometimes California expects 'Limited Liability Company' spelled out instead of 'LLC' or vice versa, depending on how it was originally filed in bizfile.

0 coins

Tony Brooks

•

Bizfile sometimes stores both versions, and UCC system might expect whichever one was used in the most recent filing. Worth checking which format appears first in bizfile search results.

0 coins

This happened to me too. Client's Articles said 'LLC' but they'd filed an amendment using 'Limited Liability Company' and UCC system wanted the amendment version.

0 coins

Yara Campbell

•

UPDATE: Finally got our filing accepted! Turned out the issue was a single character difference - bizfile had 'SERVICES' but we were using 'SERVICE' (no S). The rejection messages never indicated this level of detail. Thanks everyone for the suggestions, especially about using document verification tools to catch these tiny discrepancies.

0 coins

Sofia Price

•

Perfect example of why document verification tools are worth using. Would have caught that 'SERVICE' vs 'SERVICES' difference immediately and saved weeks of back-and-forth.

0 coins

Eli Butler

•

Exactly! Will definitely be using better verification processes for future filings. Can't believe such a small typo held up an $847K deal for three weeks.

0 coins

Prev1...351352353354355...685Next