Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just a thought but have you looked at similar filings in your state to see how others handle mixed manufacturing collateral? Sometimes the SOS website has examples or you can search recent filings for guidance on collateral language that gets accepted.
Good idea - I should check what language other filers are using successfully. Might give me some templates to work from.
Yeah, and if you see consistent patterns in what gets accepted vs rejected, it can help you craft language that aligns with what the SOS wants to see.
Update us when you get it figured out! I'm dealing with a similar mixed-collateral situation and would love to know what language finally works for the filing.
Will do! Planning to refile early next week with more specific collateral descriptions based on all this feedback.
Amina Diop
•Definitely post an update. These collateral classification issues are so common, your solution could help a lot of people.
Join the conversation
Yara Assad
Update us when you file! Always curious how these larger deals turn out. The equipment financing market in Florida has been really active this year.
Yara Assad
•Good luck! The Florida SOS system is pretty reliable so you should be fine.
Looking forward to hearing how it goes. These kinds of posts help everyone learn.
Olivia Clark
One more thing to consider - if this borrower has any other lenders or equipment financiers, you might want to check existing UCC filings before you submit yours. Sometimes there are surprises lurking in the filing records.
Aisha Patel
•Already ran a UCC search - clean slate fortunately. That was one of the first things our due diligence team checked.
Olivia Clark
•Perfect. Sounds like you've covered all the bases. Should be a smooth filing then.
Join the conversation
Zadie Patel
Hope this helps but just want to confirm you're talking about searching for existing UCC filings in New York, not some specific 'UCC 11' form or process. The standard search will show you all active financing statements filed against your debtor in NY. Make sure you spell the debtor name exactly as it appears in their formation documents.
Yes, that's exactly what I need. Thanks for confirming I was on the right track, just got confused by some online reference to 'UCC 11 search' that didn't make sense.
Probably just a typo or misunderstanding somewhere. UCC-1 search is the standard terminology.
I've been doing UCC due diligence for years and still sometimes get tripped up by name variations. Last week I almost missed a filing because the original UCC-1 used 'Inc.' while our loan documents had 'Incorporated' spelled out. Now I use Certana.ai to upload both the charter documents and any UCC filings I find - it automatically flags name inconsistencies and potential issues I might overlook when comparing documents manually. Has saved me from several costly mistakes.
It really is. The automated cross-checking catches things that are easy to miss when you're reviewing multiple documents. Plus it's much faster than doing manual comparisons.
Emma Morales
•Another vote for being extra careful with debtor names. I've seen deals delayed because of name mismatches between the UCC search and the actual entity name.
Join the conversation
Sean Kelly
honestly just go back to manual searches until these APIs get better. not worth the headache imo
Zara Mirza
•Manual isn't scalable for everyone though. Some businesses need the automation even if it's imperfect.
Sean Kelly
•yeah i get that. just saying from my experience the APIs cause more problems than they solve right now
Luca Russo
Update: Finally got our API integration working more reliably by implementing extensive name preprocessing before sending queries. We normalize all entity suffixes, remove extra spaces, and convert to uppercase before API calls. Still not perfect but rejection rate dropped from 40% to under 10%.
Luca Russo
•Sure, I can put together a quick reference guide. The key is having a comprehensive mapping table for all the common entity suffix variations.
This preprocessing approach makes sense. Most of the API failures are probably just formatting issues rather than actual search problems.
Eli Wang
UPDATE: I found the problem! It was exactly what someone mentioned about the LLC suffix. They had it registered as 'L.L.C.' with periods but I was using 'LLC' without periods. Once I changed that, the filing went through immediately. Thanks everyone for the help!
0 coins
Cassandra Moon
•Great outcome! Now you know for future filings to always check the exact formatting in the state database.
0 coins
Zane Hernandez
•Perfect example of why the exact legal name verification is so critical for UCC filings. One wrong character and your security interest isn't properly perfected.
0 coins
Genevieve Cavalier
This thread is super helpful. I'm bookmarking it because I know I'll run into this exact issue eventually. The LLC suffix thing especially - never would have thought about periods vs no periods making a difference.
0 coins
Ethan Scott
•Same here. Really good reminder to always go to the source database rather than relying on other documents.
0 coins
Lola Perez
•The document verification tool mentioned earlier sounds useful too. Might save time on complex filings with multiple parties.
0 coins