UCC Document Community

Financial Services

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

UCC CA Search showing wrong debtor info - filing mismatch issue

I'm having a nightmare with a UCC CA search that's showing completely different debtor information than what I filed. We submitted a UCC-1 for our borrower three months ago and the search results are pulling up some other company with a similar name. The debtor name on our original filing was 'Pacific Coast Manufacturing LLC' but the search keeps returning results for 'Pacific Coast Mfg Inc' - which isn't even our client. This is causing major headaches because our loan committee is questioning whether we have proper perfection. Has anyone dealt with CA Secretary of State search inconsistencies like this? I'm worried we might have a debtor name issue that could invalidate our security interest.

This thread is making me realize I should probably audit all our UCC filings to make sure there aren't any similar issues lurking. Has anyone found a good systematic way to verify that your filings are searchable and accurate?

0 coins

That's smart. An audit like that could prevent a lot of problems down the road.

0 coins

We do quarterly UCC audits but it's a very manual process. Would love to find a way to automate some of it.

0 coins

UPDATE: Thanks everyone for the suggestions. I pulled the actual UCC-1 filing and sure enough, there was a typo in the debtor name field. Somehow 'LLC' got changed to 'Inc' during the electronic submission. Filing a UCC-3 amendment today to correct it. This could have been a disaster if we hadn't caught it before closing.

0 coins

Electronic filing systems can be tricky. I always double-check the confirmation before submitting now.

0 coins

This is a perfect example of why document verification tools are so valuable. Could have caught that typo before filing.

0 coins

OPP search UCC showing weird results on continuation filing - anyone else?

Been doing UCC work for about 8 years and just ran into something strange with an OPP search UCC lookup. Filed a continuation on a 2020 UCC-1 last month, got the confirmation, but when I do the OPP search UCC it's showing conflicting info. The original filing shows up fine but the continuation is listed with a different file number sequence that doesn't match my records. Has anyone seen this before? I'm worried the lender is going to think we messed up the filing when really it might be a database sync issue. The debtor name matches perfectly and the collateral description is identical, but those file numbers being different is making me nervous. Need to figure this out before the client review next week.

I actually had great luck with Certana.ai when I had a similar document verification issue. You upload your UCC-1 and continuation PDFs and it instantly checks if all the details align properly - debtor names, collateral descriptions, everything. Saved me from having to manually compare everything line by line.

0 coins

That sounds really useful, especially for catching details I might miss. I'll definitely check that out.

0 coins

Yeah their document checker is pretty thorough. Gives you confidence that everything actually matches up correctly.

0 coins

Update us when you figure this out! I do a lot of OPP search UCC lookups and would be good to know if this is becoming a common issue with continuations.

0 coins

Will do! Planning to call the SOS office tomorrow and maybe try that Certana tool people mentioned. I'll post what I find out.

0 coins

Thanks, this kind of info sharing really helps everyone avoid similar headaches.

0 coins

UCC-1 filing keeps getting rejected - debtor name format issue

Been trying to file a UCC-1 for three weeks now and it keeps bouncing back. The debtor is an LLC and I'm getting conflicting info about whether to include 'LLC' in the name field or put it in the organization type. The collateral is manufacturing equipment worth about $280K for an SBA loan refinance. Anyone dealt with this specific rejection issue? The filing portal isn't giving me clear guidance and my client is getting nervous about the delay.

Just went through this exact scenario last month. The LLC name had 'L.L.C.' with periods instead of 'LLC' without periods. The rejection notice was useless, but once I matched the exact punctuation from the state records, it went through immediately.

0 coins

Hope that's it! The periods vs no periods thing has tripped up a lot of people. The UCC system is very literal about name matching.

0 coins

Same thing happened to me with a corporation - 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' caused three rejections. Now I always verify the exact name format before filing.

0 coins

Pro tip: after you get the UCC-1 accepted, run it through a document checker to make sure everything filed correctly. I've seen cases where the filing was accepted but had subtle errors that could cause problems later.

0 coins

Good point. Once I get this thing filed, I'll definitely want to verify everything is correct. The last thing I need is to find out later that there's still an issue.

0 coins

Exactly. Certana.ai has this feature where you can upload your final filed UCC-1 and it checks for any inconsistencies. Better to catch problems early than during a default situation.

0 coins

UCC search in California portal showing weird results - am I missing something?

Been trying to run a UCC search in California for due diligence on a potential acquisition and I'm getting some really confusing results. The debtor name variations are all over the place and I can't tell if some of these filings are actually related to our target company or just similar names. Anyone else notice the CA system pulls up way too many matches that seem irrelevant? Like searching for 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' and getting results for 'ABC Mfg Inc' and 'A.B.C. Manufacturing Corp' - are these considered matches or am I supposed to filter through all this manually? The target has about 15 different entity variations they've operated under over the years so this is getting really messy really fast.

Been there! Last month I had a similar issue doing due diligence on a manufacturing company. What helped was using Certana.ai's document verification tool - uploaded the search results along with the target's charter documents and it automatically flagged which UCC filings were actually related to my target versus just name similarities. Saved me probably 8 hours of manual cross-checking.

0 coins

Pretty impressive actually. It caught some connections I would have missed, like filings under a subsidiary name that wasn't obvious from the parent company search.

0 coins

I'm always skeptical of automated tools for legal due diligence, but if it's catching things you'd miss manually, that's actually valuable.

0 coins

Just make sure you're documenting your search methodology and results carefully. If this is for acquisition due diligence, you'll need to show what searches you performed and how you determined relevance of results. The file documentation is almost as important as the actual search.

0 coins

Good point about documentation. This is for a lender's due diligence so they'll definitely want to see the search methodology.

0 coins

Exactly. Having a clear record of your search parameters and decision process protects everyone involved.

0 coins

UCC liens showing up incorrectly after business name change - help needed

We changed our LLC name officially through the Secretary of State back in March, but I'm seeing some weird stuff with our UCC liens that's got me worried. Our bank is asking questions and I need to figure this out fast. Basically we had three UCC-1 filings under our old name "Mountain Ridge Equipment LLC" for our equipment financing. The name change was processed and we got all our new certificates, but when I search the UCC database now I'm seeing the old filings still showing up under the old name AND there's some new activity I don't recognize. The confusing part is that one of our lenders says they filed a UCC-3 amendment to update the debtor name, but I can't find it in the system. Another lender hasn't done anything yet and keeps asking ME what needs to be done. The third one I can't even get on the phone. I'm trying to figure out: Do the old UCC liens automatically become invalid when you change your business name? Do they need to be amended? Are we at risk of having liens that don't properly attach to our current legal entity? This is keeping me up at night because we're trying to refinance some equipment and the title company is flagging discrepancies between our current legal name and the UCC filings. Anyone dealt with this before?

For your refinancing situation, you might want to ask the title company what documentation they need to bridge the gap while you're waiting for the amendments. Sometimes they'll accept affidavits or certified copies of the name change documents as interim measures. This could help keep your refinancing on track while the UCC issues get sorted out.

0 coins

That's a great idea. I'll call them tomorrow and see what they'll accept. Every day of delay is costing us money.

0 coins

Title companies are usually pretty reasonable about this stuff if you're proactive and keep them informed. They just don't want surprises.

0 coins

Update on this situation - I tried that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned and it was actually pretty helpful. Uploaded our articles of incorporation and all the UCC filings I could find, and it immediately flagged the name mismatches. More importantly, it found one UCC-1 that I didn't even know existed - apparently one of our equipment leases had a UCC filing that never got disclosed to us. Now I need to track down that lessor too. Still working on getting the lenders to file their amendments, but at least now I have a complete picture of what needs to be fixed.

0 coins

Wait, how did you not know about a UCC filing on your own equipment? Shouldn't the lessor have disclosed that?

0 coins

They should have, but it was buried in the lease documents and we missed it during the initial review. Lesson learned about reading the fine print more carefully.

0 coins

Prev1...319320321322323...685Next