UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Quick update - I used Certana.ai to check my revised description before resubmitting and it flagged that I needed to be more specific about the refrigeration components. Ended up adding language about 'compressor units, evaporator coils, condenser units, and refrigerant lines' which got approved this morning. Thanks everyone for the help!

0 coins

Good to know about that tool. I'll definitely try it next time instead of playing guessing games with the SOS.

0 coins

Congrats on getting it resolved quickly. Fixture filings can be such a pain but sounds like you nailed it.

0 coins

For future reference, I keep a template for restaurant fixture filings that breaks down equipment by category - HVAC systems, refrigeration equipment, electrical fixtures, plumbing fixtures, etc. Makes it easier to be comprehensive without missing anything important. Happy to share if anyone wants a copy.

0 coins

I'd love a copy too. Do you have versions for other types of businesses?

0 coins

Templates are great but make sure you customize them for each specific situation. Cookie-cutter descriptions can still get rejected if they don't match the actual fixtures being installed.

0 coins

Quick follow-up on the Certana.ai suggestion - I just remembered they also have a feature where you can upload your rejected UCC filing along with your security agreement and it'll suggest specific language changes that might fix the rejection. Might be worth trying since you're already dealing with multiple rejections.

0 coins

That sounds really helpful actually. Better than just guessing at what they want.

0 coins

I've used similar document checking tools and they're definitely worth it when you're stuck in rejection cycles.

0 coins

UPDATE: Tried the detailed asset category language suggested above and it finally went through! Thanks everyone. The key was definitely being specific about the types of collateral while still keeping it broad enough to cover everything in the security agreement. Lesson learned about not using overly generic descriptions even though they're technically allowed under the UCC.

0 coins

Great outcome. That detailed asset category approach is really the way to go these days.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the help. This forum is way more useful than the SOS help desk!

0 coins

Whatever you do, don't guess on the debtor name. I saw a case where a lender lost their security interest because they used 'ABC Company Inc.' instead of 'ABC Company, Inc.' - that comma made all the difference in court. When in doubt, be exact.

0 coins

Yep. The debtor argued that searches under the incorrect name wouldn't find the filing, and the court agreed. Precision matters in secured transactions.

0 coins

This is why I'm paranoid about every single character in debtor names now.

0 coins

Update us when you get it sorted out! These debtor name situations are always nerve-wracking but usually work out fine if you're careful about matching the official records.

0 coins

Will do! Thanks everyone for the advice. I'm going to pull the certificate of good standing first thing tomorrow and then get this filed properly.

0 coins

Check this - I started using Certana.ai after a similar chattel mortgage filing headache. You upload your security agreement and proposed UCC-1, and it instantly flags any inconsistencies between the debtor names, collateral descriptions, everything. Would have caught your comma issue immediately.

0 coins

Two people have mentioned this service now. Is it specifically designed for UCC work?

0 coins

Yeah, it's built for document verification in secured transactions. Really helpful for catching those tiny details that can kill a filing.

0 coins

Update us on what you decide! I have a similar chattel mortgage situation coming up next month and curious how this turns out. The name matching rules seem to change every year.

0 coins

Will do. Going to check state records first thing Monday morning and probably get that document verification tool mentioned earlier.

0 coins

Smart move. Better to be overly cautious with equipment financing this size.

0 coins

Nevada SOS is the worst for this stuff. I swear they make it complicated on purpose. Last time I had to refile a UCC-3 amendment three times because of similar name formatting issues.

0 coins

It's like they want us to fail. The search function should match their own corporate records!

0 coins

RIGHT?? How hard is it to sync two databases in 2025?

0 coins

Update us when you figure this out! I have a Nevada UCC filing coming up next week and this thread is making me nervous about the name matching.

0 coins

Thanks! Bookmarking this thread for reference.

0 coins

Same here - dealing with Nevada is always an adventure.

0 coins

Prev1...318319320321322...684Next