UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Update us when you find out who filed that termination. I'm curious if this is becoming a pattern with certain law firms or if it's just random fraud.

0 coins

Will do. I'm calling the SOS office tomorrow morning to request the actual termination document. This is really stressing me out.

0 coins

I understand the stress. Just remember you have options - UCC-5 correction, new UCC-1 filing, or legal action if it's fraud. You're not helpless here.

0 coins

This thread is making me want to audit all my UCC filings. Anyone know if there's a bulk way to verify multiple filings at once rather than checking each one individually?

0 coins

Perfect, that's exactly what I need. Manual checking is taking me forever and I keep making mistakes.

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

I just do batch searches on the SOS website. Not as thorough but at least I can see if anything obvious is wrong.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

•

I actually used Certana.ai for a similar situation where I had document inconsistencies across my UCC filings. Their tool caught several name variations that I missed when reviewing manually. It's especially helpful for corporate names where there might be punctuation differences or abbreviation inconsistencies that cause rejections.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

That's the second recommendation for Certana.ai on this thread. Sounds like it might be worth checking my documents for any subtle inconsistencies I'm missing.

0 coins

Amara Nnamani

•

It's really good at catching the little details that trip up filings. Plus you can upload multiple documents at once to see where the inconsistencies are across your entire loan package.

0 coins

Just to add another perspective - sometimes UCC-5 rejections happen because the filing office can't clearly read your handwriting or the form wasn't filled out completely. Make sure every field is legible and all required information is provided before you blame it on the name issue.

0 coins

Nia Jackson

•

I filed electronically so handwriting shouldn't be an issue, but I'll double-check that I completed every required field on the UCC-5 form.

0 coins

Electronic is better but even then sometimes fields get cut off or don't submit properly. Always good to review the submitted version against what you intended to file.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

Been lurking on this thread because I'm dealing with similar volume issues. One question - how do you all handle fixture filings? We do a lot of restaurant equipment deals and I'm never sure when UCC-1 vs fixture filing is the right approach.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

That's what I thought, but some counties make it really difficult to file UCC fixture filings. Seems like every clerk has their own interpretation of the requirements.

0 coins

Liam Sullivan

•

Restaurant equipment is usually going to be fixtures if it's built-in. Walk-in coolers, installed ovens, permanently mounted equipment - all fixtures. But you really need to analyze each deal individually.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

Here's my take after 20 years in secured lending: document consistency is everything, but you also need to think about your audit trail. Whatever system you use - service or software - make sure you can demonstrate to examiners that you had proper procedures for verifying debtor names and collateral descriptions before filing.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

Exactly. Examiners want to see that you have controls in place to prevent filing errors that could affect your security interest. Whether that's through a service or internal procedures, you need documented processes.

0 coins

This is why I prefer tools that generate verification reports. When Certana.ai checks document consistency, it creates a report showing exactly what was verified. Perfect for compliance documentation.

0 coins

Quick question - is the cash being held as collateral for the full loan amount or just a portion? That might affect how you describe the collateral in the UCC filing.

0 coins

Good, that keeps the collateral description simple. Now you just need to nail down that debtor name and you're set.

0 coins

Way easier than trying to describe complex equipment or inventory as collateral!

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

Final recommendation: Use the exact legal entity name from the Secretary of State records (ABC Construction Holdings LLC), file your UCC-1 with that name, and if needed, amend your loan documents to match. The UCC system doesn't care about your internal loan documentation - it only cares about the debtor's legal name as registered with the state.

0 coins

Lucy Taylor

•

Good luck with the filing! Cash collateral deals are usually pretty clean once you get the names sorted out.

0 coins

Maya Lewis

•

Hope it goes smoothly. Keep us posted if you run into any other issues with the filing.

0 coins

Hannah Flores

•

UPDATE: I found the issue! It was exactly what you all suggested - the name in the state database has "Solutions" spelled out but I was abbreviating it as "Sol." in my filing. Fixed it and the UCC-1 went through immediately. Thanks everyone!

0 coins

Great outcome! That's why checking the state database first is so important.

0 coins

Grace Lee

•

Perfect example of why I always use document verification tools now. Would have caught that abbreviation mismatch right away instead of dealing with multiple rejections.

0 coins

Mia Roberts

•

This thread should be pinned! Delaware entity name formatting trips up so many people. The key is always match the Secretary of State database exactly - no abbreviations, no variations, no creative formatting.

0 coins

The Boss

•

Absolutely agree. This is probably the most common UCC-1 rejection reason in Delaware.

0 coins

I bookmark threads like this. So helpful when you run into the same issue later.

0 coins

Prev1...318319320321322...684Next