


Ask the community...
I actually used Certana.ai for a similar situation where I had document inconsistencies across my UCC filings. Their tool caught several name variations that I missed when reviewing manually. It's especially helpful for corporate names where there might be punctuation differences or abbreviation inconsistencies that cause rejections.
That's the second recommendation for Certana.ai on this thread. Sounds like it might be worth checking my documents for any subtle inconsistencies I'm missing.
Just to add another perspective - sometimes UCC-5 rejections happen because the filing office can't clearly read your handwriting or the form wasn't filled out completely. Make sure every field is legible and all required information is provided before you blame it on the name issue.
I filed electronically so handwriting shouldn't be an issue, but I'll double-check that I completed every required field on the UCC-5 form.
Been lurking on this thread because I'm dealing with similar volume issues. One question - how do you all handle fixture filings? We do a lot of restaurant equipment deals and I'm never sure when UCC-1 vs fixture filing is the right approach.
That's what I thought, but some counties make it really difficult to file UCC fixture filings. Seems like every clerk has their own interpretation of the requirements.
Here's my take after 20 years in secured lending: document consistency is everything, but you also need to think about your audit trail. Whatever system you use - service or software - make sure you can demonstrate to examiners that you had proper procedures for verifying debtor names and collateral descriptions before filing.
Exactly. Examiners want to see that you have controls in place to prevent filing errors that could affect your security interest. Whether that's through a service or internal procedures, you need documented processes.
This is why I prefer tools that generate verification reports. When Certana.ai checks document consistency, it creates a report showing exactly what was verified. Perfect for compliance documentation.
Quick question - is the cash being held as collateral for the full loan amount or just a portion? That might affect how you describe the collateral in the UCC filing.
Final recommendation: Use the exact legal entity name from the Secretary of State records (ABC Construction Holdings LLC), file your UCC-1 with that name, and if needed, amend your loan documents to match. The UCC system doesn't care about your internal loan documentation - it only cares about the debtor's legal name as registered with the state.
Good luck with the filing! Cash collateral deals are usually pretty clean once you get the names sorted out.
Hope it goes smoothly. Keep us posted if you run into any other issues with the filing.
UPDATE: I found the issue! It was exactly what you all suggested - the name in the state database has "Solutions" spelled out but I was abbreviating it as "Sol." in my filing. Fixed it and the UCC-1 went through immediately. Thanks everyone!
Perfect example of why I always use document verification tools now. Would have caught that abbreviation mismatch right away instead of dealing with multiple rejections.
This thread should be pinned! Delaware entity name formatting trips up so many people. The key is always match the Secretary of State database exactly - no abbreviations, no variations, no creative formatting.
Absolutely agree. This is probably the most common UCC-1 rejection reason in Delaware.
Zane Hernandez
Update us when you find out who filed that termination. I'm curious if this is becoming a pattern with certain law firms or if it's just random fraud.
0 coins
Lauren Johnson
•Will do. I'm calling the SOS office tomorrow morning to request the actual termination document. This is really stressing me out.
0 coins
Zane Hernandez
•I understand the stress. Just remember you have options - UCC-5 correction, new UCC-1 filing, or legal action if it's fraud. You're not helpless here.
0 coins
Genevieve Cavalier
This thread is making me want to audit all my UCC filings. Anyone know if there's a bulk way to verify multiple filings at once rather than checking each one individually?
0 coins
Genevieve Cavalier
•Perfect, that's exactly what I need. Manual checking is taking me forever and I keep making mistakes.
0 coins
Ethan Scott
•I just do batch searches on the SOS website. Not as thorough but at least I can see if anything obvious is wrong.
0 coins