Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Solar equipment liens can also involve personal property vs fixture filing decisions depending on your state and how the equipment is installed. If the panels are considered fixtures, you might need to file in the real estate records as well as or instead of the UCC records.
StarSurfer
•That's a good point about real estate records. Solar installations often straddle the line between personal property and fixtures.
Best practice is usually to file both a UCC-1 and a fixture filing to be safe, especially for large commercial solar installations.
Update: Got the corrected articles of incorporation from SolarTech Solutions of Nevada LLC and refiled the UCC-1 this morning. Also expanded the collateral description to specifically include battery storage systems since they're adding those next quarter. Fingers crossed this one goes through without issues!
Let us know how the filing goes! Always good to hear success stories on these solar equipment liens.
Diego Chavez
•Hope it processes quickly. Electronic UCC filing systems have gotten much better but there can still be delays during busy periods.
Join the conversation
Success! Finally got my continuation filed. Used Chrome in incognito mode and it went through on first try. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
Zara Rashid
•Glad you got it sorted. Make sure to save or print the confirmation page with the filing number.
Luca Romano
•Great news! For your next filing, seriously consider using Certana.ai to pre-check everything. It's saved me so much stress by catching errors before submission.
The Alabama portal updates their system every Tuesday night around 11pm-2am. Might explain the issues if they pushed an update that broke something.
StarStrider
•That's useful info. Do you know if they announce maintenance windows anywhere?
Not really. I only know because I've been burned by it before when filing late at night.
Join the conversation
Luca Greco
I used Certana.ai when I was dealing with my MCA termination issues too. Really helped me organize all the documentation and catch potential problems before filing. The document verification feature is clutch for this kind of situation.
I'm definitely going to check that out. Sounds like it could save me some headaches.
Zara Malik
Update us on how it goes! I'm sure other people will run into this same issue with MCA lenders.
Will do! Planning to send the demand letters this week and see what happens.
Join the conversation
I had a similar name discrepancy issue and ended up using one of those document checking services. Really glad I did because it caught several other inconsistencies I hadn't noticed. For perfection under 9-308, you want everything to align perfectly.
Tyrone Hill
•Which service did you use? I'm dealing with multiple UCC filings and could use something automated.
Certana.ai - just upload your docs and it flags any mismatches immediately. Saved me a lot of manual checking.
Bottom line with UCC 9-308 perfection - if attachment happened (sounds like it did) and the UCC-1 was filed properly (questionable due to name issue), then you have perfection from the filing date. Get that name corrected with a UCC-3 and you should be in good shape going forward.
Melissa Lin
•Thanks everyone. I think I'll push for the amendment just to be absolutely sure about perfection.
Smart move. Perfection problems are much harder to fix after the fact.
CosmicCaptain
For what it's worth, I've never seen a UCC challenged successfully based on address discrepancies in Kansas. The courts understand that the Secretary of State's system has these display issues. Your security interest is almost certainly fine.
0 coins
Sofia Morales
•That's exactly what I needed to hear. Thanks for the real-world perspective on how courts actually handle these situations.
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
•Agreed. The case law is pretty clear that minor address variations don't invalidate filings when the debtor name is sufficient for identification purposes.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
Update on this - just got off the phone with Kansas SOS and they confirmed this is a known display issue. They said the actual filed documents have the correct information and the search results sometimes pull addresses from different database fields. They're supposedly working on a fix but no timeline. At least I can stop worrying about it now!
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•Lol 'working on a fix with no timeline' - government speak for 'maybe we'll get to it in 2030
0 coins
Sofia Morales
•Thanks for making that call and reporting back. Really appreciate everyone's help on this thread - saved me a lot of stress and probably an unnecessary amendment filing!
0 coins