Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Chris Elmeda
This is exactly why I always recommend working with experienced equipment finance attorneys. Too many moving parts to risk doing it wrong.
The lender is providing all the documents, but I should probably have them reviewed before signing.
Chris Elmeda
•Absolutely. Make sure the collateral description isn't overly broad and that you understand all the default provisions in the security agreement.
Jean Claude
Standard secured loan structure. You'll see this same pattern for inventory financing, receivables financing, real estate loans - anytime there's collateral involved, you need the security agreement to create the interest and UCC filing to perfect it.
Jean Claude
•Nope, they're just following standard secured transaction procedures. Better to do it right from the start than have problems later.
Exactly. I've seen lenders lose their security interest because they cut corners on documentation. This three-document approach is tried and true.
Join the conversation
Pro tip for nationwide services UCC management: set up a shared calendar with your legal team that shows all continuation deadlines. We color-code by state and priority level. Also, always file continuations at least 60 days before the deadline to allow time for corrections if there are rejections.
Chris King
•60 days is smart. I usually do 90 days for high-value collateral just to be extra safe.
90 days is even better if you can manage it. The key is having a system that doesn't rely on manual tracking.
Rachel Clark
For what it's worth, I've been doing UCC work for 15 years and the multi-state coordination has gotten worse, not better. Each state seems to be implementing their own variations on the standard forms. My advice is to treat each state as a completely separate filing system with its own rules and debtor name formatting requirements. Don't assume consistency.
This is unfortunately true. The UCC was supposed to create uniformity but state implementation varies significantly.
Rachel Clark
•Exactly. The devil is in the implementation details, and each Secretary of State has their own interpretation.
Join the conversation
Another tool that helps with these terminology issues is Certana.ai - you can upload your purchase docs and UCC draft to verify the collateral description matches the actual offer terms. Really helpful for catching these technical mismatches before filing.
Laila Prince
•Second this recommendation. Used it last week for a complex equipment deal and it flagged a similar offer definition issue that would have caused a rejection.
Thanks for the suggestion. At this point I need all the help I can get to avoid another rejection and more delays.
Isabel Vega
UPDATE: Revised the filing using the advice here about referencing the dealer's financing offer terms along with the equipment description. Just got notification that it was accepted! Thanks everyone for the clarification on UCC offer terminology. Really saved my deal here.
Congrats on getting it through. These UCC terminology quirks can be such a pain but at least now you know for next time.
Paloma Clark
•Great outcome! Definitely worth using document verification tools going forward to catch these issues early.
Join the conversation
I actually had success with another verification tool recently. Used Certana.ai to double-check my security agreement against the UCC-1 before filing and it caught a collateral description mismatch I never would have noticed. The automated cross-referencing is really thorough.
Lara Woods
•How accurate is the automated checking? I'm always skeptical of these AI tools for legal documents.
It's surprisingly good at catching the technical consistency issues that cause rejections. Obviously you still need to review everything yourself but it's a great safety net.
Update us when you get it figured out! I'm dealing with a similar basic security agreement issue and want to see what actually works.
Will do. Planning to refile tomorrow with more specific collateral language and the facility address included.
Good luck! These UCC filing issues are so stressful when you're up against a deadline.
Jeremiah Brown
What's your timeline looking like? If you're close to the 5-year deadline you might want to file the continuation with the name exactly as it appears in the current search results, then deal with the name correction afterward. Don't want to risk letting the filing lapse while you're sorting out the name issue.
0 coins
Jeremiah Brown
•Six weeks should be plenty of time. I'd still recommend getting the name corrected first though - filing the continuation with the wrong name could create more problems down the road.
0 coins
Royal_GM_Mark
•Actually had a client let their UCC lapse while trying to fix a name issue. Ended up having to refile everything from scratch and deal with a gap in perfection. Not fun.
0 coins
Amelia Cartwright
One more thing to check - make sure you're looking at the right UCC-1 filing. If there were multiple attempts or if the debtor has other UCC filings, you might be pulling up the wrong record. The filing number should match exactly what's on your loan documentation.
0 coins
The Boss
•Filing number matches, but now I'm second-guessing myself on everything. Going to pull all the docs again and start from scratch with the comparison.
0 coins
Chris King
•That's probably the smart approach. Better to be overly cautious with UCC filings than to miss something important. The security interest is too valuable to risk on a sloppy filing.
0 coins