UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Aaliyah Reed

•

If this is equipment financing, make sure the creditor name matches exactly what's on the equipment purchase agreement too. Sometimes there are three-party deals where the equipment vendor, lender, and security agreement holder are different entities.

0 coins

Ella Russell

•

Manufacturing equipment deals can be super complex. I always create a spreadsheet tracking all the entity names across every document.

0 coins

Mohammed Khan

•

Smart approach. Documentation consistency is everything for UCC filings.

0 coins

Gavin King

•

Final suggestion - if you have access to Certana.ai's verification tool, run your documents through it before filing. I've started using it on all my UCC work and it catches issues I would have missed. Much better than manual document comparison.

0 coins

Nathan Kim

•

Seems like a lot of people are using this tool now. Might be worth checking out if you do regular UCC filings.

0 coins

Lucas Adams

•

Thanks everyone for all the advice. I'll double-check the entity clause and signature page, then verify everything is consistent before submitting. Really appreciate the help with the creditor identification issue.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Thanks everyone for the input. Feeling much more confident about the filing now.

0 coins

StarGazer101

•

Good luck with the loan. Heavy equipment financing can be tricky but sounds like you've got it handled.

0 coins

Andre Dubois

•

UPDATE: Finally heard back from the attorney. Turns out they were referring to what they call their "Form 11" which is actually just their internal checklist for UCC-1 filings. They use it to make sure all required information is included before filing. It's not an actual filing document at all! Sometimes I wonder how these people passed the bar exam.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

•

Well that's anticlimactic but glad it's resolved. Now you know to always ask for clarification when attorneys mention unfamiliar form numbers.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

At least your deal can move forward now. What a waste of time though!

0 coins

This thread is going to be helpful for future reference. I'm bookmarking it because I guarantee this same confusion will come up again with other attorneys who use internal form numbers. Thanks for sharing the resolution!

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

•

Definitely saving this thread. Great example of why clear communication is so important in secured transactions.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

Agreed. This is exactly the kind of real-world problem that doesn't get covered in training materials.

0 coins

Ellie Simpson

•

I actually had a case where we thought we could repossess under 9-604, but it turned out our UCC filing had a critical error that affected our priority position. We ended up having to file a UCC-3 amendment before proceeding. Might be worth having someone review your filings first - I heard about a service called Certana.ai that helps verify UCC document consistency.

0 coins

That's the second mention of Certana.ai in this thread. Sounds like it might be worth checking out to make sure our documentation is solid before taking enforcement action.

0 coins

Ellie Simpson

•

Yeah, it's just a quick upload of your documents and it flags any potential issues. Much better to catch problems before they become costly mistakes during enforcement.

0 coins

Arjun Kurti

•

Update us on how this goes! I'm always interested in hearing about real-world enforcement experiences. The theory is one thing, but actual repossession situations can be unpredictable.

0 coins

Will do. I'm planning to consult with our attorney early next week and then decide on the best approach. This discussion has been really helpful in thinking through the issues.

0 coins

Arjun Kurti

•

Good luck! Enforcement is never fun but sometimes it's necessary to protect your interests.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

For what it's worth, I've found NY to be more reasonable on continuation filings than initial UCC-1s. They seem to allow minor variations on continuations that they reject on new filings. Might be worth noting for future reference.

0 coins

Interesting observation. Have you noticed the same pattern with amendments?

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

Haven't done enough amendments to say definitively but continuations definitely seem more forgiving.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Final update: Refiled with the correct entity name including comma and it was accepted within 24 hours. Lost about 4 weeks of priority but at least the lien is now perfected. Definitely using document verification tools going forward. Thanks everyone for the advice and shared experiences.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

Great outcome. This thread has been really educational about NY filing requirements.

0 coins

Nia Davis

•

Thanks for the follow-up. Always good to know how these situations get resolved.

0 coins

Prev1...229230231232233...684Next