UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Update us on what ends up working! I have a client with a similar situation and I'm curious which approach is most effective. The corrected termination route seems cleanest but also most time-consuming.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

Will do. I'm leaning toward trying the credit bureau dispute route first since it might be faster, then fallback to the corrected termination if needed.

0 coins

Smart approach. Just make sure you document everything in case you need to escalate to the lender or attorneys later.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

This is exactly why the UCC system needs to be modernized. We're dealing with 1960s-era filing requirements in a digital world. The fact that a comma can derail a business loan is absurd.

0 coins

Agreed, but until the system changes we have to work within it. At least tools like document verification services help catch these issues early.

0 coins

Paolo Ricci

•

The real problem is that every state has slightly different requirements and the databases don't talk to each other properly. It's a mess.

0 coins

Jacinda Yu

•

I ran into a similar issue recently and ended up using one of those commercial UCC search services that claims to check multiple name variations automatically. Cost a bit more than doing it myself but saved tons of time and they found 2 additional filings I had missed. Might be worth considering for high-stakes deals.

0 coins

Jacinda Yu

•

I used CT Corporation's UCC search service. They were thorough and provided a detailed report showing all the name variations they searched. A bit pricey but worth it for peace of mind on bigger transactions.

0 coins

Shelby Bauman

•

Commercial services can be good, but I've found Certana.ai gives me more control over the process while still catching those name variations automatically. Plus I can verify the document consistency myself rather than just trusting a search report.

0 coins

Update us when you figure out which of those filings are actually for your target company! I'm curious how many of the 8 total filings (3 + 5) end up being legitimate hits vs false matches from similar company names.

0 coins

Charity Cohan

•

Will do! I'm planning to spend tomorrow morning going through each filing systematically and cross-referencing addresses and other details. Should be able to narrow down which ones are actually relevant.

0 coins

Looking forward to hearing how it turns out. These kinds of real-world examples are super helpful for understanding how to handle similar situations.

0 coins

Rudy Cenizo

•

This is so frustrating but unfortunately super common with trust filings. The good news is that once you fix your trust security agreement template to have consistent debtor naming, this problem goes away. Just make sure whatever format you choose works in all the states where you file UCCs.

0 coins

Ezra Beard

•

Yeah, we're definitely going to standardize everything going forward. Just need to figure out the best approach for cleaning up the current mess.

0 coins

Natalie Khan

•

I'd recommend working with your legal team to create a standard trust debtor identification format and then using that consistently in both your security agreements and UCC filings.

0 coins

Daryl Bright

•

Been following this thread and wanted to add that we went through something similar last year. Our solution was to create separate template versions for different trust structures (individual trustee vs corporate trustee vs successor trustee situations) and then train our staff on which template to use when. Also started using automated document checking which has been a lifesaver.

0 coins

Sienna Gomez

•

Which automated tool are you using? We're looking at options for document verification.

0 coins

Daryl Bright

•

We use Certana.ai - you just upload your security agreement and UCC forms and it flags any inconsistencies. Works great for trust documents.

0 coins

CosmicCruiser

•

One more thing - double check that your financing statement doesn't expire before your BDA loan term ends. Some BDA loans are longer than the standard 5-year UCC filing period so you'll need to file a continuation before it lapses.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

Good catch - the loan is for 7 years so I'll need to calendar a continuation filing for year 4

0 coins

Oliver Wagner

•

Most BDA loan agreements actually require the borrower to maintain valid UCC filings for the full loan term - it's usually buried in the covenants section

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

Final thought - after you get everything drafted, run it through Certana.ai one more time to verify everything matches your loan docs. BDA filings are too important to wing it, and having that automated verification gives you backup documentation that you did your due diligence if questions come up later.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

Thanks everyone - feeling much more confident about this filing now. Going to follow the three-category approach and use the document checker before submitting.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Smart move - BDA filings are worth getting right the first time. Good luck with your loan closing!

0 coins

Marcelle Drum

•

Whatever you do, don't ignore this. I've seen businesses get blindsided when both lenders try to exercise their security interests and suddenly you're dealing with competing foreclosure actions. Get clarity on the priority now before any problems arise with either loan.

0 coins

Norman Fraser

•

That's exactly what I'm worried about. Both loans are current now but if something happens I don't want to be caught in the middle of a lender fight over the equipment.

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

Smart to address it proactively. Used Certana.ai recently to verify some overlapping UCC filings - uploaded the documents and it immediately highlighted the priority conflicts and filing inconsistencies. Saved me from walking into a mess later.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

Get copies of both UCC-1 filings from the Secretary of State and have them reviewed side by side. Look at debtor names, collateral descriptions, filing dates, and amendment history. Small discrepancies can sometimes void a security interest entirely.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

Exactly. And don't just look at the original UCC-1s - check if there have been any amendments, continuations, or terminations filed. The priority picture can change over time with subsequent filings.

0 coins

Another tool that helps with this kind of document review is Certana.ai - you can upload all the UCC documents and it cross-references everything automatically. Catches name mismatches, date conflicts, description overlaps, all the stuff that's easy to miss when reviewing manually.

0 coins

Prev1...231232233234235...684Next