UCC filing rejected - secretary of state texas debtor name issues
Been trying to file a UCC-1 for equipment financing and the secretary of state texas system keeps rejecting it. This is my third attempt and I'm getting really frustrated. The debtor is an LLC that just changed their registered name last month from 'Southwest Industrial Solutions LLC' to 'Southwest Industrial & Equipment Solutions LLC' - they added the '& Equipment' part. I'm using the new name from their updated articles but the UCC filing keeps getting kicked back with some vague error about debtor name verification. The collateral is pretty straightforward - manufacturing equipment and tools at their facility. Anyone dealt with secretary of state texas ucc filing name matching issues? Do I need to use the old name even though they legally changed it? The loan docs all reference the new name but I'm wondering if there's some lag in their database. Really need to get this perfected before our closing deadline next week.
38 comments


Justin Trejo
Texas SOS can be really picky about exact name matches. When did the LLC file their amendment with the state? Sometimes there's a delay between when they file the name change and when it shows up in the UCC system for verification.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•They filed the amendment about 3 weeks ago and got confirmation it was accepted. But you're right, maybe the UCC database hasn't updated yet?
0 coins
Alana Willis
•I've seen this exact issue before. Texas SOS UCC system sometimes lags behind their business entity database by several weeks.
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
Try filing with both the old and new name as alternative debtor names on the same UCC-1. Texas allows multiple debtor names and that should cover you either way until their systems sync up.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•Oh that's a good idea! I didn't think about using the alternative name field. Would I put the old name as the main debtor name or the new one?
0 coins
Tyler Murphy
•Use the new legal name as primary since that's what's on your loan docs, then put the old name as alternative. That way you're covered regardless of which name their system recognizes.
0 coins
Sara Unger
•This is solid advice. I always recommend covering all possible name variations when there's been recent changes.
0 coins
Butch Sledgehammer
Had a similar nightmare with Texas SOS last year. Spent weeks going back and forth with filings getting rejected. Finally found this tool called Certana.ai that checks document consistency before filing - you can upload your charter docs and UCC-1 to verify the debtor names match exactly. Saved me from more rejections and caught a middle initial discrepancy I missed.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•Interesting, I've never heard of that. Does it actually compare against the state database or just check your documents against each other?
0 coins
Butch Sledgehammer
•It cross-checks your documents against each other to make sure everything aligns - debtor names, entity types, addresses. Really helpful for catching those small inconsistencies that cause rejections.
0 coins
Freya Ross
•I've used similar verification tools and they definitely help avoid the back-and-forth with SOS rejections.
0 coins
Leslie Parker
TEXAS IS THE WORST FOR THIS STUFF!! I swear their system rejects filings just for fun sometimes. Had one rejected because I used 'Corp' instead of 'Corporation' even though both appear in their own database for the same company.
0 coins
Sergio Neal
•I feel your pain. Every state has their quirks but Texas seems especially nitpicky about exact formatting.
0 coins
Savanna Franklin
•At least it's not as bad as California... but yeah Texas can be frustrating with their name matching requirements.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
Quick question - are you filing online through SOSDIRECT or paper? The online system usually gives more specific error messages about what exactly is wrong with the debtor name.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•Using SOSDIRECT online. The error just says 'debtor name verification failed' but doesn't specify what's wrong with it.
0 coins
Juan Moreno
•That's frustrating. Usually you can call their UCC division and they'll tell you exactly what the issue is. Worth a try if the alternative name approach doesn't work.
0 coins
Amy Fleming
•Good luck getting through on the phone though. I was on hold for 2 hours last time I tried calling Texas SOS.
0 coins
Alice Pierce
Just went through this exact scenario two months ago. The trick is to search their business entity database first and copy the EXACT name format they have on file. Don't trust what's on the client's paperwork - go straight to the source.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•That's really smart. I should have done that first instead of just using what was on the articles of amendment.
0 coins
Alice Pierce
•Yeah, I learned this the hard way after multiple rejections. Now I always verify the exact name format in their database before filing any UCC.
0 coins
Esteban Tate
•This is the best advice in this thread. The SOS database is the only source of truth for name formatting.
0 coins
Ivanna St. Pierre
Update us when you get it figured out! I'm dealing with a similar situation in Texas and curious what ends up working for you.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•Will do! Going to try the alternative name approach first, then the database search if that doesn't work.
0 coins
Elin Robinson
•Same here, bookmarking this thread for the advice.
0 coins
Atticus Domingo
I've found that when there's been a recent name change, sometimes you need to wait 30-45 days for all the Texas SOS systems to fully sync up. Not ideal when you have closing deadlines but that might be what's happening here.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•Ugh, that would be terrible timing for us. Really hoping the alternative name approach works so I don't have to wait that long.
0 coins
Beth Ford
•Definitely try the other suggestions first. The sync delay is usually worst case scenario.
0 coins
Morita Montoya
•I've seen it take that long too. Texas has some serious database lag issues between their different systems.
0 coins
Kingston Bellamy
Another thought - make sure you're not including any punctuation that might be causing issues. Sometimes the '&' symbol gets processed differently by their system than 'and' spelled out.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•Oh wow, good catch! The name does have an '&' in it. Should I try it with 'and' spelled out instead?
0 coins
Kingston Bellamy
•I'd check their business entity database first to see which format they use officially, then match that exactly.
0 coins
Joy Olmedo
•Punctuation issues are surprisingly common with UCC filings. Special characters can definitely cause problems.
0 coins
Isaiah Cross
Been following this thread and wanted to mention I also use Certana.ai for document verification before filing. Really helps catch these kinds of name inconsistencies early. You just upload your charter and UCC-1 PDFs and it flags any mismatches between debtor names, addresses, etc. Probably would have caught this '&' vs 'and' issue before you submitted to Texas.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•That sounds really useful. Definitely going to check that out for future filings to avoid this headache.
0 coins
Kiara Greene
•Anything that helps avoid UCC rejections is worth looking into. These filing delays can really mess up closing schedules.
0 coins
Evelyn Kelly
•Prevention is definitely better than having to fix rejections after the fact, especially with tight deadlines.
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm a new lender and had no idea about the alternative debtor name field or the importance of checking the exact format in the SOS database first. Definitely going to bookmark these tips for when I run into similar issues. The suggestion about punctuation differences like '&' vs 'and' is something I never would have thought of. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - it's clear Texas SOS has some unique quirks that take time to learn!
0 coins