Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Nia Williams
Actually had a similar situation last week where I kept getting Utah rejections. Ended up using that Certana thing someone mentioned earlier to cross-check all my documents. Found a tiny discrepancy in how I had formatted the LLC designation that I never would have caught manually. Filed clean after that. For deals this size, the small cost is worth avoiding the delays.
That's exactly what I'm worried about - missing some tiny formatting issue that keeps causing rejections. I'll look into that tool.
Nia Williams
•Yeah it's pretty quick, you just upload your PDFs and it flags potential issues. Beats going back and forth with the state filing office.
Luca Ricci
Utah's UCC Article 9 compliance is actually better than a lot of states once you get the hang of it. Their online portal is decent and rejections usually come back quickly so you're not waiting weeks to find out about problems. The key is just being super precise with the debtor name formatting.
Luca Ricci
•Exactly. Utah typically processes within 24-48 hours which is pretty good for government work.
Much better than states that take weeks just to tell you there's a problem.
Join the conversation
Brady Clean
One thing to double-check - make sure your debtor name on the UCC-1 matches EXACTLY what's in your loan documents. That's where most filing problems come from, not special language requirements. If the lender has 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' in the loan but you file under 'ABC Manufacturing' without the LLC, that could cause perfection issues.
Skylar Neal
•This is so important! I've seen deals where the security interest wasn't properly perfected because of tiny name discrepancies.
Sophie Duck
•Good point. I'll triple-check all the entity names across documents before filing. That seems way more critical than the 1-308 language confusion.
Final thought - if you're still worried about document consistency, Certana.ai has a really simple upload process where you can verify everything aligns correctly before filing. Just drag and drop your PDFs and it cross-checks all the names, descriptions, and requirements automatically. Takes the guesswork out of complex deals like this.
Sophie Duck
•I'm definitely going to check that out. This deal has too much at stake to risk filing errors over document confusion.
Norah Quay
•Smart move. Better to verify everything upfront than deal with amendment filings later if something doesn't match up.
Join the conversation
File under your company name as debtor with a detailed collateral description of leasehold interests. Standard practice for equipment lease financing. Just make sure your lease allows it and your bank understands they're securing lease rights, not equipment ownership.
This is the clearest explanation I've seen. Thanks for cutting through all the confusion.
These lease collateral situations always seem more complicated than they need to be. The key is being precise about what rights you're actually granting to your bank.
One more thing to consider - if you have a master lease with multiple equipment schedules, make sure your UCC filing covers future equipment additions under the same lease. Otherwise you might need to file amendments every time you lease additional equipment.
Language like 'all present and future leasehold interests under Master Lease Agreement with ABC Equipment Leasing' should cover additions. But verify with your lawyer.
Mei Wong
•We tried that approach but our bank wanted specific equipment serial numbers listed. Every bank seems to have different requirements for lease collateral descriptions.
Join the conversation
Mateo Lopez
Another thing to watch for - some LLCs have member names or manager names in their registered entity name. Like 'John Smith Management LLC' vs 'JS Management LLC'. The loan docs might use the abbreviated version but the legal entity name could be the full version.
QuantumLeap
•That's a good point. I'll double-check if there are any abbreviations in our debtor name.
Mateo Lopez
•Yeah abbreviations vs full names are another common source of UCC rejections.
Once you get the name issue sorted out, make sure your collateral description is solid too. Equipment financing can be tricky if you're not specific enough about the equipment details. Serial numbers, model numbers, location - all important for perfection.
Good. The name is usually the biggest stumbling block so once that's fixed you should be in good shape.
Yeah get the debtor name perfect first, then worry about collateral descriptions. One thing at a time.
Aaliyah Jackson
Try searching with just the first few words of the entity name, no punctuation. CA's system sometimes strips out special characters differently than you'd expect.
0 coins
Abigail bergen
•That's a good tip. I'll try some abbreviated searches and see if anything comes up.
0 coins
KylieRose
UPDATE: Found it! Turns out you were all right about the name variations. The original UCC-1 was filed with 'Limited Liability Company' spelled out instead of 'LLC'. CA's search didn't pick up the abbreviation match. Thanks everyone for the suggestions!
0 coins
Anderson Prospero
•Nice! Those little details can be so frustrating to track down.
0 coins
Aiden O'Connor
•Perfect example of why automated document checking is so helpful - would have flagged that LLC vs Limited Liability Company difference immediately.
0 coins