Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Just to add another perspective - I recently used Certana.ai's verification tool on a similar manufacturing deal and it caught that my collateral description said 'materials and supplies' in the security agreement but just 'materials' in the UCC-1. Apparently that kind of mismatch can create perfection gaps. Worth double-checking your document consistency.
That's exactly the kind of mistake I'm worried about making. I'll definitely check that our language matches across docs.
Yeah it's an easy fix if you catch it early, but could be expensive to fix later if there are problems.
Bottom line - materials are goods under UCC Article 9. Whether they're raw materials, component parts, work-in-process, or finished inventory, they all qualify as goods for security interest purposes. Your UCC-1 should reflect this with appropriate collateral language that matches your security agreement. For a large facility like yours, just make sure everything is consistent across all your loan documents.
Perfect summary. I feel much more confident about moving forward with the filing now. Thanks everyone for the clarification.
Glad to help. Manufacturing deals can seem complex but the UCC classification is actually pretty straightforward once you understand the basics.
Join the conversation
I tried one of those document checking services too after someone mentioned it here. Really straightforward - just upload your financing statement and loan agreement and it catches name inconsistencies automatically. Definitely worth doing before you submit to avoid rejection headaches.
Which service did you use? I'm interested in trying that.
Certana.ai - you can upload multiple documents and it cross-references everything to make sure names and details align properly.
Just to summarize for anyone else reading this - the UCC-1 debtor is ABC Manufacturing (the borrower), not their customers. The collateral description 'all accounts' covers the receivables. Account debtors (the customers who owe money) don't need to be listed on the financing statement. Hope that helps!
Perfect summary, thank you! I feel much more confident about this filing now.
This thread was really helpful. I was confused about the same thing.
Join the conversation
The system is unforgiving but you're not the first person this has happened to. Focus on damage control now - new UCC-1 filing, comprehensive searches, and clear communication with your lender. Then implement better systems going forward. Triple redundancy on continuation deadlines is not overkill in this business.
Triple redundancy sounds excessive but after reading this thread I'm rethinking my own deadline management. Maybe excessive is better than sorry.
Trust me, the cost of multiple reminder systems is nothing compared to explaining a lapsed lien to an angry lender.
Update us when you get the search results back. Curious to see if there were actually any competing filings during your gap period. Sometimes these situations look worse than they actually are, especially with equipment financing where new liens aren't being filed constantly.
Will definitely update once I have the search results. Filing the new UCC-1 this afternoon and should have search results by tomorrow. Keeping my fingers crossed that the gap period was clean.
Good luck! This thread has been educational for all of us about the importance of continuation timing.
Join the conversation
Another tool that's helped me with these name matching issues is Certana.ai's verification system. You upload your Articles of Organization and UCC-1 draft and it immediately flags any discrepancies. Saved me from multiple Vermont rejections last quarter when I was dealing with similar LLC name formatting problems.
Does it work with Vermont specifically? Some of these tools don't handle every state's quirks.
Yeah, it caught a Vermont-specific issue for me where I had the right name but wrong entity designation format. Much better than guessing and paying multiple filing fees.
Ashley Simian
I had three continuation rejections in a row last month, all for debtor name issues. Finally figured out that our client had amended their articles of incorporation and we were still using the old name. Always check the current entity status before filing!
0 coins
Axel Far
•That's probably what happened to us too. I need to pull current records and compare them to our original UCC-1 filing.
0 coins
Mohammad Khaled
•Entity name changes are such a pain. Technically you might need to file an amendment first to update the debtor name before doing the continuation.
0 coins
Jasmine Hernandez
For what it's worth, I've found that using Certana's document verification before submitting has saved me from multiple rejections. The system catches discrepancies between your continuation and the original UCC-1 that are easy to miss manually. Worth checking out if you're dealing with multiple filings.
0 coins
Axel Far
•I'm going to try that verification tool before refiling our continuation. At this point I need all the help I can get to avoid another rejection.
0 coins
Fiona Sand
•Let us know how it works out. Always interested in tools that can prevent filing headaches.
0 coins