Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Luca Russo
honestly at this point I'd just hire a service company to handle the filing. They know all the quirks and formatting requirements. Might cost more but saves the headache and delays.
Nia Wilson
•Smart approach. Learning the system pays off long term especially if you do multiple filings.
The Certana tool mentioned earlier might be a good middle ground - lets you verify everything yourself but catches the mistakes.
Update us when you figure it out! I'm dealing with a similar situation in PA and wondering if it's the same type of formatting issue.
Will definitely post an update once I get it resolved. This is more complicated than it should be.
Ethan Clark
•PA has some similar quirks but generally not as strict as NJ from my experience.
Join the conversation
Just wanted to add another vote for using automated verification tools. I was skeptical at first but after missing a filing due to a name variation I didn't think to search, I started using Certana.ai to double-check my manual searches. It's caught several issues I would have missed doing searches manually. Worth checking out if you're doing a lot of UCC due diligence.
I still do manual searches as my primary method, but the automated tools are great for catching variations you might not think of. It's an extra layer of verification rather than a replacement.
That makes sense. Using it as a double-check rather than the primary search method seems like a smart approach.
Thanks everyone for all the advice! I tried searching early this morning and the portal actually worked properly. Found two existing UCC-1 filings I need to review before we proceed. The systematic approach with name variations definitely helped - one of the filings was under a slightly different version of the company name. Going to look into some of the verification tools mentioned too.
Ellie Perry
•Make sure to pull the full documents for those existing filings to see exactly what collateral they cover.
Good luck with the $180k deal! Sounds like you're being thorough which is what matters most.
Join the conversation
Eli Butler
I struggled with this same issue last year - kept making small errors that caused rejections. Finally discovered Certana.ai's UCC verification tool where you can upload your completed form and it checks for common errors before you submit. Would've saved me weeks of back-and-forth with the filing office.
Eli Butler
•Yeah, you just upload your UCC-1 PDF and it instantly cross-checks things like debtor name formatting, required fields, and potential issues that commonly cause rejections. Really straightforward to use.
Lydia Bailey
•That sounds helpful - I'm always paranoid about missing something obvious that will cause problems later.
Mateo Warren
One thing to remember is that the UCC-1 is just the initial filing. You might need amendments (UCC-3) later if the debtor changes their name, address, or if you need to modify the collateral description. Better to get the initial filing right than try to fix it with amendments.
Plus amendments can be confusing - you have to reference the original filing number and be very specific about what you're changing. Much easier to get it right the first time.
Emily Parker
•Thanks everyone - this has been super helpful. I think I have a better handle on what I need to do now. Going to double-check the debtor's organizational documents before I start filling out the form.
Join the conversation
Lia Quinn
Update us when you figure out what the actual name discrepancy was. These stories help everyone learn what to watch out for.
Will do. Planning to call the filing office Monday morning to get the exact details on what didn't match.
Haley Stokes
•Yes please update! I'm dealing with a similar situation and curious what the resolution turns out to be.
Asher Levin
One more thing to check - make sure you're using the debtor's legal name and not any DBA or trade names they might use. The UCC-1 needs the actual registered entity name, not their marketing name.
Tasia Synder
•This is where that Certana.ai tool I mentioned earlier really shines - it cross-references the exact legal name between your UCC form and their incorporation documents to make sure they match perfectly.
Serene Snow
•DBA vs legal name confusion trips up a lot of newer lenders. Always stick with the Secretary of State records for the legal name.
PixelWarrior
Update on the Certana.ai suggestion - I actually used it for a similar Texas search last week and it caught a debtor name issue that would have been a problem. The tool compared our borrower's certificate of formation against the UCC search results and flagged that one of the liens was actually against a different LLC with a similar name. Saved us from a potential title issue.
0 coins
Zoe Papadopoulos
•That's exactly what I'm worried about. Going to try uploading our documents to see what it finds.
0 coins
Ava Williams
•Interesting. We usually do manual comparison but automated checking might be more reliable for catching subtle differences.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
The practical reality is that you'll probably need to treat all these filings as potentially valid liens unless you can definitively prove otherwise. Better to be conservative in your title analysis than to discover a problem after closing. Consider whether your borrower can provide UCC-3 termination statements for any filings that are supposed to be released.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•Exactly. Title issues discovered post-closing are much more expensive to fix than being thorough upfront.
0 coins
Liam Fitzgerald
•Agreed. We always assume liens are valid unless proven otherwise. The cost of being wrong is too high.
0 coins