


Ask the community...
Just went through this exact scenario with Alabama UCC forms two weeks ago. Used the Certana document checker someone mentioned and it immediately flagged that my debtor name had an extra comma that wasn't in the Articles of Incorporation. Would have definitely been rejected without catching that. Simple upload process and instant feedback on document consistency.
That's why document verification tools are so valuable. Human eyes miss those tiny details that can kill a filing.
Makes sense to use technology to catch what we might miss manually. These filing fees add up when you have to keep amending.
Update us on how your Alabama UCC forms filing goes! Always interested to hear about real experiences with name matching issues since every state seems to handle it differently.
Will definitely update once I file! Feeling much more confident after all this advice. Going to double-check the name one more time and probably try that document verification tool too.
Update us on how this turns out! I'm curious whether BECU actually filed any UCC statements for your secured card or if it's just account-level security.
One more thing - make sure your UCC-1 continuation gets filed on time regardless of this BECU issue. You don't want to let that lapse while sorting out the secured card question.
Agreed. Never let UCC continuations slide, even when dealing with other issues.
Hope this all works out for you! Multi-state filings stressed me out too when I first started doing them. Once you get the jurisdiction rules down, it becomes much more routine.
Thanks for the encouragement! This forum has been really helpful.
That's what we're here for. Good luck with your filing!
Update: Got the UCC-1 filed successfully with the Delaware Division of Corporations. The debtor name verification was key - made sure it matched their certificate of incorporation exactly. Thanks everyone for the advice!
Awesome! Another successful filing. Always feels good when everything goes according to plan.
One more tip for the original poster - keep a copy of exactly what you file. If you ever need to do an amendment or continuation, you'll want to reference the exact language from your original UCC-1.
learned this the hard way when I couldn't find my original filing language for a continuation. Had to order a certified copy from the state.
To wrap this up - your collateral description should be clear, accurate, and sufficient to give notice. Don't overthink the 'contract definition' aspect. You're describing collateral, not drafting the contract itself. For construction equipment, use language that reasonably identifies the equipment without being overly broad or unnecessarily specific.
Thank you everyone - this has been incredibly helpful. I feel much more confident about moving forward with the filing now.
Great thread - I learned a lot too. The Certana.ai suggestion is definitely worth looking into for complex filings.
Evelyn Xu
Just to close the loop on this - I ended up filing with a straightforward equipment description and kept all the covenant language in the security agreement. No issues with the filing and everything was accepted. Thanks for the help everyone. The key insight was realizing that UCC covenant definition isn't something that belongs in the filing itself - covenants are contractual terms that stay in your loan documents.
0 coins
Dominic Green
•Glad it worked out! This is one of those things that seems more complicated than it actually is.
0 coins
Hannah Flores
•Perfect example of keeping the UCC filing focused on its purpose - giving notice of the security interest, not publishing the loan terms.
0 coins
Kayla Jacobson
For anyone else reading this thread later - the main takeaway is that covenant language belongs in your security agreement, not your UCC filing. The UCC-1 should have a clear collateral description that identifies what's secured, but it doesn't need to include the contractual restrictions (covenants) that apply to that collateral. Keep it simple and keep it focused on perfecting your security interest.
0 coins
William Rivera
•This should be pinned or something. Really clear explanation of how to handle covenant issues in UCC filings.
0 coins
Grace Lee
•Agreed - this thread answered a question I didn't even know I had about covenant definitions in UCC filings.
0 coins