Colorado Secretary of State UCC Lien Search Results Not Matching Our Records
Having a nightmare situation with our Colorado Secretary of State UCC lien search system. We filed a UCC-1 back in March for equipment financing on construction machinery, and when I run the debtor name through their online search portal, it's pulling up completely different results than what we expected. The search is showing liens filed by other creditors that we know should be there, but our filing isn't appearing even though we have the confirmation receipt. I've tried variations of the debtor company name (ABC Construction LLC vs ABC Construction, LLC vs A.B.C. Construction LLC) but still getting inconsistent results. This is for a $180,000 equipment line and we need to verify our lien position before the borrower's other creditors start filing additional liens. Has anyone else had issues with Colorado's UCC search functionality showing incomplete or delayed results? We're worried there might be a filing error that we missed, but the SOS confirmation email shows everything was accepted properly.
43 comments
Join the conversation
Justin Evans
Colorado's system can be really finicky with debtor name searches. I've seen this happen when there are slight variations in how the legal entity name was entered vs how it appears on state records. Did you verify the exact legal name against their business entity database first? Sometimes the UCC filing gets accepted but indexed under a slightly different name format.
0 coins
Emily Parker
•This is exactly right. Colorado indexes by exact name match, so even a missing comma can throw off search results.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•I did check the business entity database and the name matches exactly. That's what's so frustrating about this whole situation.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
Run the search by filing number instead of debtor name. If you have your UCC-1 confirmation, use that filing number in their search portal. That should pull up your exact record regardless of any name indexing issues. Also check if there's a delay - sometimes new filings take 24-48 hours to appear in search results even after acceptance.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•Good idea, let me try the filing number search. It's been over a week since filing though, so delay shouldn't be the issue.
0 coins
Victoria Scott
•Filing number search is always more reliable than name search. I learned this the hard way after spending hours trying different name combinations.
0 coins
Benjamin Johnson
I had a similar issue with Colorado last year and ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool to cross-check everything. You can upload your UCC-1 filing and it instantly verifies the debtor name matches exactly with what's on file, plus checks for any potential issues that might affect search visibility. Really helped me identify a small formatting problem that was causing search issues.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•Never heard of that service but sounds like it could help. Is it easy to use?
0 coins
Benjamin Johnson
•Super easy - just upload your PDF and it runs automated checks against filing requirements. Saved me from having to manually compare documents line by line.
0 coins
Zara Perez
•I've used similar document checkers before and they're definitely worth it for catching things you might miss manually.
0 coins
Daniel Rogers
Colorado Secretary of State UCC search has been having intermittent issues lately. I filed three different UCC-1s in the past month and two of them had search visibility problems initially. Both eventually showed up properly after about 10 business days. The system seems to have indexing delays beyond their normal processing time.
0 coins
Aaliyah Reed
•10 business days?? That's way too long for something this important. What if other creditors are filing in the meantime?
0 coins
Daniel Rogers
•Exactly my concern. I started calling their UCC division directly when search results don't match what I expect within 3-4 days.
0 coins
Ella Russell
Are you searching under the right entity type? If ABC Construction is filed as an LLC but you're searching under corporation parameters, that could explain the mismatch. Colorado separates search categories by entity type in some of their advanced search options.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•I'm using the standard debtor name search, not filtering by entity type. Should I be using different search parameters?
0 coins
Ella Russell
•Try the advanced search and make sure the entity type matches what's on your original filing. Sometimes that makes the difference.
0 coins
Mohammed Khan
•Entity type filtering definitely matters in Colorado. I've seen filings get missed because of that exact issue.
0 coins
Gavin King
THIS DRIVES ME CRAZY! Colorado's UCC system is honestly terrible compared to other states. I spend half my time trying to figure out why searches don't work properly instead of actually doing my job. The fact that a $180k lien might not show up properly in searches is exactly the kind of problem that keeps me up at night.
0 coins
Nathan Kim
•I feel your pain. Some state systems are so much better than others for UCC work.
0 coins
Gavin King
•Right?? Why can't they all just work the same way? Makes no sense that something this important varies so much state to state.
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
Check if your debtor has any doing-business-as names or trade names that might be indexed separately. Colorado sometimes files liens under DBA names if that's how the business operates, even if the legal entity name is different.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•That's a really good point. I'll check if they have any DBA filings that might be affecting the search.
0 coins
Eleanor Foster
•Yeah, trade names can really complicate UCC searches. Always worth checking the business name database for alternatives.
0 coins
Justin Evans
•DBA issues are so common. I always ask clients for all possible business names they use before filing anything.
0 coins
Lucas Turner
Update us when you figure it out! I'm dealing with something similar in Colorado right now and would love to know what ends up working for you.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•Will definitely post an update once I get this resolved. Hopefully it's something simple.
0 coins
Lucas Turner
•Thanks! These Colorado UCC issues seem to be getting more common lately.
0 coins
Victoria Scott
Try running the search with just the core business name without LLC or any punctuation. Sometimes Colorado's system strips formatting and searches on the base name only. So instead of 'ABC Construction, LLC' try just 'ABC Construction' and see what comes up.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•I did try that variation but I'll run it again to make sure. Maybe I missed something the first time.
0 coins
Victoria Scott
•It's worth double-checking. Colorado's search algorithm seems to change how it handles punctuation periodically.
0 coins
Ezra Collins
•Good advice. I always run multiple name variations when doing UCC searches in any state.
0 coins
Kai Rivera
Just went through this exact same thing last month. Turned out our filing was indexed correctly but there was a glitch in their search portal that wasn't displaying results properly. Had to call the Colorado SOS UCC division and they confirmed our filing was on record and searchable, just not showing up in the online portal. They said it was a known technical issue they were working on.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•That's both reassuring and concerning at the same time. Did they give you any timeline for when the portal issues would be fixed?
0 coins
Kai Rivera
•They said it was intermittent and they were working on it, but no specific timeline. Typical government IT response unfortunately.
0 coins
Aaliyah Reed
•This is exactly why I always call to verify important filings rather than just relying on online search results.
0 coins
Mohammed Khan
Another option is to use Certana.ai's verification tool to make sure your original UCC-1 filing was formatted correctly and matches all the required data points. If there's any inconsistency between your filing and Colorado's requirements, that could explain why it's not appearing in searches properly. The tool checks document consistency and debtor name accuracy automatically.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•That sounds really helpful for double-checking our work. I'm starting to think there might be some formatting issue we're not seeing.
0 coins
Mohammed Khan
•It's definitely worth checking. Document formatting issues are more common than people realize, and they can cause all sorts of search and indexing problems.
0 coins
Anna Stewart
Final update - called Colorado SOS directly and they confirmed our filing is on record and properly indexed. Turns out there was indeed a technical issue with their search portal that was affecting certain date ranges. They manually verified our lien is in first position and properly filed. Thanks everyone for the advice, especially about trying the filing number search and calling directly when online results don't make sense.
0 coins
Justin Evans
•Great news! Always good to hear when these things get resolved properly.
0 coins
Gavin King
•Glad it worked out, but seriously, Colorado needs to fix their system. This kind of technical issue shouldn't happen with something this important.
0 coins
Lucas Turner
•Thanks for the update! This gives me confidence to call them about my similar issue.
0 coins
Ava Harris
I'm glad I found this thread! I'm new to UCC filings and this kind of search issue would have sent me into a panic. It's really helpful to see that calling the SOS directly is a viable option when the online portal isn't cooperating. I'll definitely keep that in mind for future filings. Also appreciate all the tips about name variations and using filing numbers instead of debtor names for searches - these are exactly the kinds of practical insights you don't learn from the filing guides.
0 coins