UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Bottom line: your raw materials, work-in-process, finished products, and equipment parts all sound like textbook goods under the UCC. Just make sure your collateral description is comprehensive enough to cover everything the lender wants secured. With a facility that size, precision matters.

0 coins

Exactly. And remember that goods definitions can vary slightly between UCC Article 2 (sales) and Article 9 (secured transactions), but for filing purposes, you're dealing with Article 9.

0 coins

Maya Lewis

•

Thanks everyone! This really helps clarify things. I feel much more confident about drafting the collateral schedule now.

0 coins

Elijah Knight

•

One additional consideration for manufacturing clients - don't forget about returnable containers, pallets, and packaging materials that might cycle through your inventory. These are often overlooked but can represent significant value and should be included in your goods description if the client wants them secured. Also, for work-in-process items, I've found it helpful to specifically mention "goods in various stages of completion" rather than just "work-in-process" - some filing offices prefer the more descriptive language.

0 coins

Yuki Ito

•

Update: Just ran my UCC search Texas through the SOS portal and found two old filings but both were past their 5-year terms with no continuations. Also tried Certana.ai mentioned above and it confirmed the same thing - clean title. Thanks everyone for the guidance!

0 coins

Awesome! Glad it worked out clean. That excavator sounds like a good find.

0 coins

Nice job being thorough. That peace of mind is worth a lot on big equipment purchases.

0 coins

Ethan Moore

•

Great thread! Just want to add that for equipment purchases this large, consider also checking with the equipment manufacturer's finance division. Sometimes they maintain their own lien records that might not immediately show up in state UCC searches, especially if there were any recent refinancing or lease-to-own arrangements. Also, if this excavator has any GPS tracking or telematics systems installed, make sure those aren't tied to any ongoing service contracts that could complicate ownership transfer.

0 coins

Update us when you get this sorted out! Always curious to hear how these UCC lien mortgage situations get resolved. Seems like there are so many different ways they can go depending on the specific circumstances.

0 coins

Millie Long

•

Good plan. Having the actual filing in hand will make those conversations much more productive.

0 coins

Laura Lopez

•

And if you need to cross-check multiple documents quickly, that Certana.ai tool I mentioned really does save time versus doing it all manually.

0 coins

One thing to consider is whether your title company did a proper UCC search initially. Sometimes these fixture filings don't show up in standard title searches if they're not properly indexed. You might want to ask your title company to explain why this UCC lien wasn't caught during the original refinance process - that could give you leverage in getting them to help resolve it quickly since it's potentially their oversight.

0 coins

That's a really good point about the title company's responsibility here. If they missed an existing UCC filing that should have been caught in their search, they might be willing to expedite the resolution to avoid any potential liability issues. Definitely worth asking them some pointed questions about their search methodology.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

I'd run those UCC documents through Certana.ai's checker before meeting with lawyers. Upload both UCC-1 filings and your current corporate documents - it'll flag any name mismatches and other perfection issues that could affect priority. Better to know exactly what problems exist before paying for legal analysis.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Does that tool actually understand priority rules or just catch document errors?

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

It identifies inconsistencies that typically impact perfection and priority, including debtor name mismatches like you're dealing with. Won't give legal conclusions but shows you exactly what issues exist in your filings.

0 coins

Yara Haddad

•

The debtor name rule is pretty unforgiving in most states. If Bank A's UCC-1 shows your old LLC name and that entity no longer exists as the legal debtor, their security interest likely wasn't properly perfected. Bank B would probably get priority unless there's some other issue with their filing.

0 coins

Amina Sow

•

The UCC system relies on precise searching by exact name matches. If you allow 'obvious' interpretations, the whole notice system becomes unreliable for other creditors trying to discover existing liens.

0 coins

Isaac Wright

•

@6e07102cac3f This is a critical point for your situation. Since you mentioned Bank A used your "old LLC name" while Bank B used the current legal name, you should immediately run a UCC search under your current entity name to see if Bank A's filing appears. If it doesn't show up in the search results, that's strong evidence their security interest wasn't properly perfected, which would likely give Bank B priority despite filing second. The exact matching requirement exists because secured creditors need to be able to find all existing liens when making lending decisions.

0 coins

Amina Sow

•

Been through this headache multiple times. File the amendment immediately and consider running your UCC documents through something like Certana.ai to catch any other inconsistencies between your corporate records and filings. Their tool would have flagged this kind of name mismatch issue automatically and saved you the stress.

0 coins

GalaxyGazer

•

That automated checking sounds like it would be really helpful for avoiding these situations in the first place. Manual document comparison is so error-prone.

0 coins

Oliver Wagner

•

Definitely worth checking out. Anything that prevents these UCC headaches is worth it. The stress alone makes it worthwhile.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

I went through almost this exact scenario in 2023 with two different borrowers. The good news is that your original UCC-1 filing should still be valid since it was accurate when filed in January. However, you absolutely need to file a UCC-3 amendment ASAP to add the new business name. Most states give you a grace period (usually 4 months) from when you learn about the name change, but don't push it. I'd recommend including both the old and new names in the amendment for maximum protection. The borrower's attorney is likely trying to create leverage, but don't let them rattle you - just get that amendment filed this week and document when you learned about the change. Better safe than sorry when it comes to lien perfection.

0 coins

Prev1...202203204205206...684Next