UCC Document Community

Update: Just got off the phone with XYZ Capital and they confirmed they'll file the UCC-3 assignment by end of week. They said they were waiting for some internal approvals but agreed it should have been done already. I'm going to follow up Friday to make sure it actually gets filed. Thanks everyone for the advice - this forum is a lifesaver!

As a newcomer to this community, I'm finding this thread incredibly helpful! I'm actually in a similar situation - my business loan was just transferred to a new lender last week and I had no idea about the UCC assignment requirements. Reading through everyone's experiences here has given me a clear action plan. I'm going to call my new lender tomorrow and ask about their timeline for filing the UCC-3 assignment. It's reassuring to know this is a common issue and that there are specific steps I can take to stay on top of it. Thank you all for sharing your knowledge!

Pro tip from someone who files hundreds of these: always copy the debtor name directly from the SOS search results page, not from your own documents. Paste it into a plain text editor first to strip any formatting, then copy from there into your continuation form. This eliminates 90% of formatting and encoding issues. Also double-check that you're using the correct original file number - sometimes people transpose digits and don't realize it.

This thread is incredibly helpful - I'm dealing with a similar situation right now with a UCC-1 continuation that keeps getting rejected. Based on all the advice here, I'm going to: 1) Download the official UCC-1 from the SOS database instead of using my copy, 2) Copy the debtor name exactly and paste it through a plain text editor to strip formatting, 3) Check if there were any corporate name changes since the original filing, and 4) Look into that Certana.ai verification tool that multiple people mentioned. Connor, definitely don't wait - with 6 weeks left you have time to fix this but not if you keep getting rejections. The backup UCC-1 filing suggestion is smart too while you sort out the continuation issue.

Document review is so critical in secured transactions. I always triple-check that we have proper attachment before filing anything. 9203 doesn't give you much wiggle room.

This is a tough spot but not uncommon. First, immediately check if your loan agreement contains any security language - sometimes there's a clause granting a security interest that could satisfy 9203 even without a separate security agreement. Second, reach out to the borrower ASAP to get a proper security agreement signed. While this won't give you retroactive attachment, it's better than remaining unsecured. Third, consider having your legal team review the entire transaction to see if there are any other documents that might establish authentication. Time is critical here - the longer you wait, the more risk you have of other creditors gaining priority or the debtor's situation deteriorating.

Tesla UCC filings are definitely more complex than traditional auto loans. The entity structures, direct sales model, and leasing arrangements create unique challenges. My suggestion would be to get certified copies of all relevant documents (title, registration, any amendments) before refiling. Better to have too much documentation than not enough when dealing with exact name match requirements.

I've been through this exact nightmare with Tesla UCC filings! The name matching requirements are absolutely brutal, but I found a workaround that might help. Before refiling, try requesting a "debtor name search" from the filing office - some states offer this service where they'll tell you exactly how the debtor name appears in their system. It's usually faster than going through DMV and costs way less than a rejected filing. Also, if you're working with Tesla Vehicle Leasing entities, double-check if they've had any recent name changes or amendments. I had one case where the LLC had filed a name change six months earlier but the title wasn't updated yet. The Secretary of State search will show the current legal name while the DMV title might still show the old version. This could save you from having to choose between a title correction or a refile.

I just went through this exact situation last month. What worked for me was getting a title company involved to coordinate all the recordings and make sure everything was consistent. They caught several issues I would have missed. Also used some online tool - Certana something? - that verified all my document names matched up correctly before filing. Saved me from what would have been multiple rejections.

One more thing to watch out for - make sure your UCC-1 fixture filing gets filed in the real estate records in addition to the central UCC filing office. Texas requires dual filing for fixture filings to be fully effective. The Secretary of State filing gives you priority against other UCC secured parties, but you also need to file in the county real estate records where the property is located to get priority against real estate interests. I've seen deals where they only did one filing and lost priority because of it.