Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I actually used Certana to double-check a similar situation. Uploaded my security agreement, deed of trust, and UCC-1 draft, and it caught that I had a slight variation in the debtor name that would have caused problems. Really streamlined the review process.
How much does something like that cost? Worth it for smaller deals?
The peace of mind is worth it regardless of deal size. Filing mistakes are expensive to fix later.
Don't forget about continuation statements either. Your UCC-1 will need to be continued before the 5-year mark, while your deed of trust doesn't have the same filing requirements.
Your security interest becomes unperfected and you lose priority. Not good.
Another reason to use a system that tracks these deadlines automatically.
Join the conversation
OP - one more thing to consider: if any of these are fixture filings, you might need to check with the county recorder's office as well. UCC fixtures have dual filing requirements in some cases.
Good to know. Equipment filings are much more straightforward - just the state-level UCC records you need.
If you end up with a complex mix of filing types in the future, the Certana document verification tool is really helpful for making sure you've covered all the bases across different jurisdictions.
Just want to add that when you mail your UCC-11 form, consider using certified mail with return receipt so you have proof of delivery. I've had requests get lost in the mail before and it's a nightmare to prove you submitted it on time when you're up against audit deadlines. Also, make sure your check is made out exactly as specified on their website - they're picky about payee names and will return the whole package if it's wrong.
Join the conversation
UPDATE: I ended up filing both ways after consulting with local counsel. UCC-1 for all the removable equipment and fixture filings for the transformer installations. Also used that Certana document checker someone mentioned earlier - it caught a discrepancy in how we described the switching equipment between the security agreement and UCC filing. Closing went smoothly once we corrected that. Thanks for all the input!
Glad the document verification helped! It's amazing how often those small inconsistencies slip through even with careful review.
Great outcome - always satisfying when a complex utility deal comes together properly.
Thanks for sharing the update on your successful closing! This is exactly the kind of practical guidance that's so valuable for utility financing. The dual filing approach is conservative but smart - I've seen too many deals get derailed by perfection issues when lenders try to cut corners on fixture filings. Your experience with the document verification tool catching the collateral description discrepancy is a perfect example of why consistency across all loan documents is critical. Even small wording differences between the security agreement and UCC filings can create gaps that sophisticated borrowers or their counsel might exploit later. For anyone else dealing with similar utility infrastructure deals, this thread is a great reminder that when in doubt, over-file rather than under-file - the additional cost is minimal compared to the risk of an unperfected security interest.
This thread has been incredibly helpful as someone new to utility financing! The complexity around fixture vs equipment classifications seems daunting, but the consensus around dual filing makes sense from a risk management perspective. I'm curious - for those who've used document verification tools like Certana, do you find they help with the initial collateral description drafting, or are they mainly useful for final review and consistency checking? Also, when you're doing both UCC-1 and fixture filings, do you typically use identical collateral descriptions or tailor them to each filing type?
Join the conversation
Just wanted to mention that I started using Certana.ai after seeing it mentioned here. Uploaded my corporation's charter and UCC-1 form and it caught a middle initial mismatch I would have missed. Saved me from a rejection and having to pay twice. Really simple to use.
That's exactly the kind of mistake I'm worried about making. Glad you found something that works!
Yeah it's pretty handy for catching those tiny details that can kill your filing.
One more thing to consider - if you're filing multiple UCCs for the same debtor, make sure you use the exact same debtor name format on all of them. I've seen situations where someone filed a UCC-1 with "ABC Corp." and then later filed a continuation with "ABC Corporation" and it created issues. California treats these as different debtors even though it's the same company. Better to be consistent from the start than deal with headaches later.
Jacinda Yu
One last tip - if you're concerned about accuracy of your UCC filings, there are verification services that can help. I recently used Certana.ai to double-check all my UCC documents against my original loan paperwork. It caught a couple minor inconsistencies I wouldn't have noticed but that could have caused headaches later. Worth the peace of mind when you're dealing with multiple secured transactions.
0 coins
Jacinda Yu
•Pretty fast - you just upload the PDFs and it analyzes them automatically. Takes minutes instead of hours of manual comparison.
0 coins
Callum Savage
•Definitely going to look into this. I've been manually checking my UCC filings and it's tedious and error-prone.
0 coins
Carlos Mendoza
This is really helpful information! I had no idea UCC filings were so routine. I'm in a similar boat - just found out about a UCC filing from equipment financing and was panicking. It sounds like the key is just staying current on payments and understanding what assets are tied up. Question for everyone: when you're applying for new financing, do you proactively mention existing UCC filings to lenders or wait for them to ask? I want to be transparent but don't want to unnecessarily complicate the conversation if it's truly as standard as everyone is saying.
0 coins
Kyle Wallace
•I usually wait for them to ask rather than bringing it up first thing. Most experienced commercial lenders will run UCC searches as part of their standard due diligence anyway, so they'll discover them regardless. When they do ask, I just explain what each filing is for and confirm that payments are current. Being ready with that information shows you're organized and transparent without making it seem like you think it's a problem. The fact that you're asking this question shows you have the right mindset - it's all about being prepared to discuss it professionally when it comes up.
0 coins
Justin Evans
•I agree with Kyle's approach - let them discover the filings through their normal search process. I've found that bringing it up too early can make it seem like you're worried about it, which might raise unnecessary red flags. When lenders do ask, I keep it simple: "That's from our equipment financing with XYZ Company, payments are current and on schedule." Most commercial lenders see UCC filings all day long, so they're really just checking boxes in their due diligence process. The main thing is having your payment history ready to show if they ask for it.
0 coins