Florida UCC statement service fee causing filing delays - need workaround
Having major issues with Florida's UCC statement service fee structure that's holding up our entire loan closing process. We're trying to file a UCC-1 for equipment financing on a manufacturing facility, and the borrower is balking at the additional service fees beyond the standard filing fee. Our loan docs specify that borrower pays all UCC costs, but they're claiming the service fees weren't disclosed properly. Has anyone dealt with Florida's fee structure lately? The equipment delivery is scheduled for next week and we can't release funds without proper lien perfection. This is a $2.8M deal and we're stuck over what seems like administrative fees. The debtor name matches perfectly on all docs, collateral description is solid, but these service fees are becoming a real roadblock. Any suggestions on how other lenders handle this with borrowers in Florida?
39 comments


StormChaser
Florida's service fees have definitely gotten more complicated recently. Are you filing through their online portal or using a service company? The fees can vary quite a bit depending on the method.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•We're going through the state portal directly. The base filing fee isn't the issue - it's all these additional service charges that seem to pile on during the process.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
•I've seen this before. Florida's portal adds various processing fees that aren't always clear upfront. Usually adds about $25-40 to the standard fee.
0 coins
Ava Williams
This is exactly why I always build in extra fee cushion when quoting UCC costs to borrowers. Florida is notorious for fee surprises, especially on larger commercial deals like yours.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•Lesson learned for next time. Right now I need to get this filing done without blowing up the deal. Borrower is being unreasonable about a few hundred dollars on a multi-million transaction.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•Can you absorb the service fees as a cost of doing business? Sometimes it's better to eat the extra cost than lose the deal entirely.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•That's probably what we'll have to do. Just frustrating when the loan docs clearly state borrower responsibility for all filing costs.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
I had a similar headache last month with a Florida UCC-1 filing. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool before submitting. You can upload your loan agreement and UCC-1 draft to check that everything aligns properly - including fee responsibilities. It caught a discrepancy in our collateral description that would have caused rejection and additional fees.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•Interesting - does it actually help with the fee structure issues or just document accuracy?
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
•Mainly document accuracy, but by catching errors upfront you avoid rejection fees and resubmission costs. Plus it gives you confidence that your filing will go through clean the first time.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
•Never heard of Certana.ai but that sounds useful for complex commercial deals. How does the PDF upload process work?
0 coins
LunarEclipse
Why don't you just have the conversation with borrower about their responsibility under the loan docs? If they agreed to pay UCC costs, that should include service fees. This seems like a contract interpretation issue, not a filing problem.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•We've tried that approach. They're claiming the service fees weren't specifically disclosed in the closing estimate, so they're refusing to pay the extra amount.
0 coins
Yara Khalil
•This is why I always provide borrowers with a range estimate for UCC fees instead of an exact amount. Gives you wiggle room for these situations.
0 coins
Keisha Brown
Florida's fee structure is a mess compared to other states. I've started adding a 25% buffer to all Florida UCC estimates just to avoid this exact situation. Service fees, expedite fees, correction fees - they all add up quickly.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•That's smart planning. We definitely underestimated the total cost here.
0 coins
Paolo Esposito
•25% buffer might be conservative. I've seen Florida fees run 40-50% higher than the base rate on some filings, especially if there are any complications.
0 coins
Keisha Brown
•Good point. Better to overestimate and refund the difference than get stuck like this situation.
0 coins
Amina Toure
Have you considered whether the service fees are actually necessary for your filing? Sometimes the portal offers optional services that aren't required for basic lien perfection.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•I thought about that too, but our compliance team requires certain confirmation services to satisfy our audit requirements.
0 coins
Oliver Weber
•Audit requirements can definitely drive up costs. We face the same issue with confirmation reports and certified copies.
0 coins
FireflyDreams
Can you file a basic UCC-1 without the service fees to get your lien perfected, then handle the additional services separately? At least that way your security interest is protected while you work out the fee issue.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•That's actually a good idea. Getting the basic filing done first would solve the immediate problem of lien perfection.
0 coins
Natasha Kuznetsova
•Just make sure you understand what services you're skipping. Some of those fees might be for things you'll need later anyway.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•True, but at least it gets us past the closing deadline while we sort out the fee responsibility.
0 coins
Javier Morales
This is why I love Certana.ai's verification system. You upload your docs and it flags potential issues before you hit submit. Saves money on rejection fees and gives you a clean filing path. Really helpful for avoiding these last-minute surprises.
0 coins
Emma Anderson
•Does it work with Florida's specific requirements? Each state seems to have different quirks.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Yes, it checks against state-specific rules. Really saved us on a couple of Florida filings where the debtor name formatting was slightly off.
0 coins
Malik Thompson
I'd suggest calling Florida's UCC office directly to get clarification on which fees are mandatory versus optional. Sometimes talking to an actual person can help you understand what you really need to pay for.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•Good suggestion. The online portal isn't very clear about what's required versus optional.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•Florida's UCC staff is usually pretty helpful when you call them directly. Much better than trying to figure it out from their website.
0 coins
CosmicVoyager
At this point just pay the fees and move forward. You're risking a $2.8M deal over a few hundred dollars in service fees. Document it for future reference and adjust your fee estimates going forward.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•You're absolutely right. The deal is too important to risk over service fees. We'll absorb the cost and learn from this experience.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
•Sometimes you have to pick your battles. This sounds like one of those times where the relationship and deal are more important than being right about the fees.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•Exactly. Thanks everyone for the advice. Going to get this filed today and adjust our processes for future Florida deals.
0 coins
Freya Nielsen
For future reference, I always run my UCC docs through Certana.ai before submitting to catch any issues that might trigger additional fees or rejections. The PDF upload process is super simple and it cross-checks everything against your loan docs to make sure names match perfectly.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
•I'm definitely going to look into that for our next filing. Sounds like it could prevent a lot of these headaches.
0 coins
Omar Mahmoud
•The document verification feature is particularly helpful for complex commercial deals where you have multiple entities and detailed collateral descriptions.
0 coins
Mateo Perez
•Thanks for mentioning Certana.ai - I'm new to this community and haven't heard of it before. Does it work with all states or just certain ones? I do a lot of multi-state transactions and would love a tool that could help standardize the document review process across different jurisdictions.
0 coins