Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Update: Finally got it accepted! Turns out the issue was a comma in the debtor name that didn't match the corporate registration exactly. Used Certana.ai to verify all the document details matched perfectly before resubmitting. The collateral description was fine all along - just that one punctuation mark was causing the rejections. Thanks everyone for the help!
Ava Garcia
•That's exactly the kind of thing the document verification catches. Saves so much time and frustration.
Yara Nassar
•A COMMA?! See what I mean about the Minnesota SOS being ridiculous about tiny details.
As someone new to UCC filings, this thread is incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation - equipment lease filing that keeps getting rejected. The tip about calling Minnesota SOS directly at 651-296-2803 is gold, and I'm definitely going to try that document verification tool several of you mentioned. It's amazing how something as small as a comma can derail a $847k filing. Thanks for sharing all these practical solutions!
Join the conversation
Molly Hansen
FINAL UPDATE: Talked to the finance company's legal counsel directly. The "UCC-109" was indeed their internal equipment inventory form that they wanted attached as an exhibit to the UCC-1. They agreed to stop calling it a UCC form to avoid future confusion. Crisis resolved!
Great job pushing back! Too many people just accept whatever the lender says without questioning it.
Molly Hansen
•Thanks everyone! This thread gave me the confidence to challenge them on it. Really appreciate all the expert input here.
This is such a valuable thread! I'm relatively new to UCC filings and have been second-guessing myself every time a lender mentions forms I haven't heard of. It's reassuring to know that experienced professionals also encounter this confusion and that the solution is usually to verify directly with the Secretary of State or ask for statutory authority. I'm definitely going to bookmark this discussion for future reference when dealing with questionable form requirements.
Join the conversation
The key thing to remember is that Article 9 governs HOW you perfect your security interest (filing requirements, debtor names, etc.) while the other articles might govern the underlying transaction. But for UCC filing purposes, you're living in Article 9 world.
Same here - knowing that I can focus on Article 9 for our secured lending makes this much less overwhelming.
StarSurfer
•Definitely bookmarking this discussion for future reference. Thanks everyone for breaking this down so clearly!
This is exactly the kind of breakdown I needed when I started working with UCC filings! One thing that might help is thinking about it in terms of your daily workflow - Article 9 covers everything you'll do with security interests (your UCC-1s, continuations, amendments, terminations), while the other articles are more about the underlying business transactions. So when you're reviewing those UCC-1 filings for equipment financing, you're operating under Article 9's rules for debtor names, collateral descriptions, filing locations, etc. The other articles become relevant if you need to understand the broader transaction context, but for the actual filing compliance, Article 9 is your roadmap.
Join the conversation
Carmen Lopez
Just wanted to follow up on something mentioned earlier - I tried that Certana.ai tool someone recommended and it's actually pretty impressive. Uploaded our UCC search results from a recent deal and it flagged two potential issues that we hadn't noticed. One was a debtor name variation that we should have searched for, and another was a continuation that extended a lien we thought had expired.
That's exactly the kind of thing we're trying to avoid. Going to check it out. Thanks for the follow-up!
Carmen Lopez
•No problem. The automated cross-checking is really helpful for catching things that might slip through manual review, especially when you're dealing with complex corporate structures or multiple name changes.
This hits close to home - we had a similar scare last year on a $1.2M manufacturing equipment deal. The seller had gone through a merger in 2020 and there was an active UCC-1 filed under their pre-merger entity name that our initial search completely missed. What saved us was doing a corporate history search and then running UCC searches on all the predecessor entities. It's an extra step but absolutely worth it when you're dealing with companies that have had name changes, mergers, or restructuring. Now I always request a complete corporate history from the seller upfront and search every entity name that shows up in that chain. The small additional cost is nothing compared to the potential disaster of missing an active lien.
That's a great point about corporate history searches. I never thought to systematically search predecessor entities, but it makes total sense given how often companies go through restructuring these days. The merger scenario you described is exactly what I'm worried about with our current deal - the seller mentioned they went through some kind of corporate reorganization a few years back but weren't specific about the details. I'm going to request that complete corporate history documentation you mentioned. Thanks for sharing that approach!
Kelsey Chin
The whole UCC system seems unnecessarily complicated for what should be a simple process. Why can't they just make it more user-friendly??
0 coins
Daniel Rivera
•tell me about it! dealing with these government portals is always a nightmare
0 coins
Ruby Blake
•It's gotten better over the years but there's definitely room for improvement. The uniformity across states helps though.
0 coins
Evelyn Martinez
Welcome to UCC filings! I've been doing these for about 8 years now and can share a few practical tips. First, create a checklist to follow every time - debtor's exact legal name from SOS records, your company's exact legal name, accurate addresses, and clear collateral description. For $185k, I'd also recommend getting a UCC search report before filing to see what other liens exist and understand your priority position. The Illinois portal usually processes filings within 2-4 hours during business days. One last thing - consider whether you need any special endorsements like fixture filings if equipment is attached to real property. You've got this!
0 coins
Ava Garcia
•This is incredibly helpful, thank you! The checklist idea is great - I'll definitely create one to make sure I don't miss anything. Quick question about the UCC search report - is that something I can do myself through the Illinois SOS system or should I use a third-party service?
0 coins