Will ESD ever raise weekly benefit amounts? $999 max isn't enough for Seattle families in 2025
Does anyone else think ESD's benefit amounts are ridiculously outdated? The current maximum of $999/week might sound decent until you try supporting a family of 4+ in Seattle or anywhere on the west side. And the minimum of $317? That barely covers groceries these days! I know they adjusted the minimum recently, but it's still practically nothing. I'm curious - does anyone know how long it's been since they actually raised the maximum benefit amount? The cost of living has skyrocketed, especially housing, but unemployment benefits seem frozen in time. Seems like ESD needs to wake up and adjust to the current economy. People who've worked and paid into the system deserve benefits that actually reflect today's costs.
17 comments


Samantha Hall
the max was like $790 for years then they finally bumped it up to $999 in 2023 i think. still way too low tho with rent being like $3000+ for anything decent sized. system is broken man
0 coins
Noah Torres
•Wow, so it took them THAT long just to get it to $999? That's insane considering how much costs have gone up since then. No wonder so many people are struggling.
0 coins
Ryan Young
The benefit amount calculation is actually set by state law, not just ESD policy. The maximum benefit amount is calculated as a percentage of the state's average weekly wage from the previous year. Until the legislature changes the formula, ESD can't just decide to increase the amounts. For perspective, in 2021 the max was around $850, then it went up to $929 in 2022, and hit $999 in 2023. So there are annual adjustments, but they're tied to wage growth across the state, which hasn't kept pace with housing costs, especially in King County.
0 coins
Sophia Clark
•EXACTLY! And the problem is that the "average weekly wage" calculation includes the whole state - even rural areas where wages and costs are way lower. So those of us in Seattle get completely screwed because our cost of living is WAY higher than Moses Lake or Yakima. The whole system needs an overhaul!!!
0 coins
Katherine Harris
I worked at WorkSource for several years, and this was one of the most common complaints we heard. The benefit formula is meant to replace approximately 60% of your wages up to the maximum, which is why it varies by person. The issue is that housing costs have risen much faster than wages, especially in urban areas. One thing to consider - the unemployment system wasn't originally designed to fully replace income long-term. It was meant to be a temporary bridge during job transitions. That said, I completely agree the amounts haven't kept pace with reality in high-cost areas. If you feel strongly about this, contact your state representatives. The formula can only be changed through legislation.
0 coins
Noah Torres
•Thanks for the insider perspective! I understand it's not meant to be a permanent solution, but even as a temporary bridge, it's falling short. I'll definitely look into contacting my state reps about this.
0 coins
Madison Allen
If you're struggling with the ESD phone system while trying to resolve benefit amount questions or other claim issues, you might want to try Claimyr. They helped me get through to an actual ESD agent after I'd been trying for weeks. Their system holds your place in line so you don't have to keep redialing. You can check them out at claimyr.com - they have a video demo that shows how it works: https://youtu.be/7DieNd3C7zQ?si=26TzE_zGms-DODN3 I was skeptical at first but was desperate after getting disconnected repeatedly for two weeks straight. Finally got my issue resolved the same day I used their service.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
•Does this actually work? I've been trying to reach someone at ESD about my benefit calculation for THREE WEEKS now. Either busy signals or disconnected after waiting forever. I'll try anything at this point 😩
0 coins
Sophia Clark
THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS RIGGED!!! I was on unemployment in 2020 and again now and they haven't changed ANYTHING meaningful. They expect people to survive on these pittance amounts while the politicians get rich. And don't even get me started on how they calculate the benefit amount - they use your two highest QUARTERS, not your actual highest EARNINGS period. So if you had one amazing month and then average months, they average it all together and you get WAY LESS than you deserve!!!!!
0 coins
Justin Evans
•I don't think that's entirely accurate. They take your highest two quarters during your base year and average them, then calculate about 60% of that for your weekly benefit. It's not perfect but it's not trying to shortchange you specifically. The bigger issue is definitely the maximum cap regardless of what you earned before.
0 coins
Joshua Wood
I recently wrote to my state representative about this very issue! She wrote back saying there's actually a bill in committee right now that would change the formula to account for regional cost of living differences, but it's been stuck for months. Apparently, there are concerns about increasing business taxes to fund higher benefits. What's frustrating is that many of us paid into this system based on much higher wages than the benefits we're eligible to receive. My previous job paid $125k/year, but because of the cap, my unemployment is less than half of what I was making. How am I supposed to maintain my mortgage payments?
0 coins
Noah Torres
•That's encouraging that there's at least a bill, even if it's stuck. Did your rep mention the bill number? I'd like to look it up and maybe add my voice to push for it.
0 coins
Emily Parker
yeh its rough my brother got laid off from amazon and his unemployment is like half what he was making even tho he was paying into the system for years. cant even cover rent with that let alone everything else
0 coins
Justin Evans
I'm in a similar situation - family of 5 in Kirkland. When I lost my tech job, going from $175k to maximum unemployment was a MASSIVE shock. We're burning through savings just to keep up with the mortgage. The thing is, I understand the system was designed decades ago when having a max benefit made sense - most people weren't earning what tech/healthcare/professional services pay now. The system hasn't evolved to match the modern economy. On the flip side, I spoke with a friend who lost a retail job in Spokane, and for her, the benefits are actually not bad compared to her previous income. Shows how much geographic disparity there is.
0 coins
Noah Torres
•That geographic disparity is exactly the problem! Maybe they should consider a county-by-county approach instead of one-size-fits-all for the whole state. The cost of living in King County vs. eastern Washington is night and day.
0 coins
Ryan Young
Just as an update on the timeline - I looked it up and the maximum weekly benefit amount increases each July based on the previous year's average annual wage. So the $999 amount was set in July 2023 based on 2022 wages and will adjust again this July (2025) based on the state's average wage from 2024. As several people noted, the challenge is that it's a statewide average that doesn't account for regional differences. The benefit amount is intended to be approximately 63% of your average weekly wage, up to that maximum cap. For anyone wanting to advocate for change, the relevant laws are in RCW 50.20.120.
0 coins
Katherine Harris
•That's correct! And just to add some context - Washington actually has one of the more generous unemployment systems in the country. Some states have maximum benefits in the $300-400 range regardless of prior earnings. The challenge is that our housing costs, especially in the Seattle metro area, have outpaced wage growth by so much that even a relatively generous system struggles to provide adequate support.
0 coins