Will taking Social Security retirement at 62 affect my brother's Workers' Comp disability payments?
Hey folks, I need some guidance on an important decision for my sister who's approaching retirement age. She was permanently injured at her manufacturing job about 8 years ago and receives Workers' Compensation disability payments twice monthly (about $2,800 total per month). Every year, her WC insurance company sends a form asking if she's receiving any SSDI benefits, which would reduce her Workers' Comp payments dollar-for-dollar. She's never applied for SSDI, so we always check "no". Here's my question - she's turning 62 next month and considering applying for regular Social Security retirement benefits (not disability). Would taking early retirement benefits affect her Workers' Comp payments the same way SSDI would? The WC form specifically asks about "Social Security Disability" but doesn't mention regular retirement benefits. I'm her financial POA and don't want to mess anything up that could reduce her overall income. Anyone dealt with this situation before?
16 comments


Mei Wong
My cousin had something like this happen. I think they still reduced his payment when he took ss retirement. The insurance company said benefits r benefits no matter what there called. But maybe different states have different rules?
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Thanks for sharing that. That's exactly what I'm worried about. Did your cousin try to appeal the reduction or just accept it? I wonder if different WC insurance companies handle this differently.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
This is an important question that involves the intersection of Worker's Compensation and Social Security benefits. The answer depends partly on your state laws, as Workers' Comp is state-regulated. Typically, Workers' Compensation offset rules are specifically designed for SSDI (Social Security Disability Insurance) because both are disability programs. Regular Social Security retirement benefits are technically different and based on age rather than disability status. However, some Workers' Comp settlements have language that could include ANY Social Security benefits. You should: 1) Review her Workers' Comp settlement paperwork carefully for any mention of retirement benefits 2) Consult with a Workers' Compensation attorney in your state 3) Consider the financial implications - taking SS at 62 means a permanently reduced benefit (about 30% less than waiting until Full Retirement Age) Also be aware that if she switches to retirement benefits to avoid a potential offset, this strategy might be questioned by the WC carrier.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•this is wrong information! i work for an insurance company and we ABSOLUTELY consider all SS income as offsettable! doesn't matter if its retirement or disability! the point is your not supposed to double-dip from multiple benefit systems
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
OMG I'M DEALING WITH EXACTLY THIS RIGHT NOW!!! My husband has been on WC for 3 years after a construction accident and is turning 62 in June. When we called his Workers Comp adjuster to ask this same question, they told us VERY CLEARLY that yes, they will reduce his payment by the amount of ANY Social Security benefit he receives!!! They basically told us the insurance company doesn't care WHY you're getting Social Security money - they just care THAT you're getting it. The form might say "disability" but their lawyers said the policy covers all "government benefits" which includes regular SS retirement. We were FURIOUS because it feels like robbery!!! He earned those retirement benefits through decades of work, and now can't even benefit from them because WC just takes that amount away!!! The system is COMPLETELY RIGGED against injured workers!!!
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Oh no, that's really disappointing to hear. I was hoping there might be a distinction between SS retirement and disability for this purpose. Did you end up having your husband apply for SS retirement anyway, or did you hold off because of this issue?
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
I want to clarify something important here - the answer truly does depend on state law and the specific language in your sister's Workers' Compensation settlement. In some states and under some policies, there is a distinction between SSDI and retirement benefits for offset purposes. In others, all Social Security benefits are treated the same. The best approach is to: 1) Contact your state's Workers' Compensation board for information about your specific state's laws 2) Request a written clarification from the WC carrier about their offset policy regarding retirement benefits 3) Calculate the financial impact both ways (with and without applying for early SS) Sometimes the total combined benefit amount works out about the same either way, but you need to run the numbers for your specific situation.
0 coins
Mei Wong
•My cousin lives in Ohio if that helps any1. He said after they reduced his payment it wasnt worth it to get the SS
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
I spent TWO MONTHS trying to get an answer to this exact question from Social Security last year. Their phone lines are always busy, and when I finally got through, I got transferred 3 times and then disconnected! Completely frustrating! I finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) to get through to a live SSA agent. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. After speaking with an actual knowledgeable person at SSA, I learned that while SS doesn't reduce retirement benefits because you receive Workers' Comp, many WC policies DO reduce their payments if you receive ANY type of SS benefit. The agent suggested getting a written response from the WC insurer before applying for any SS benefits. This saved me from making a costly mistake with my husband's benefits.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•That Claimyr service sounds really helpful. I've been trying to reach SSA for weeks with no luck. I'll check it out. And that's good advice about getting something in writing from the WC insurer - I'll definitely do that before we make any decisions.
0 coins
StarStrider
It really depends on the specific workers comp policy language. My dad had a similar situation in Florida and found out that his policy specifically defined "Social Security Disability Benefits" as offsettable but didn't mention retirement benefits. When he turned 62, he started collecting retirement benefits without any reduction to his workers comp. But then six months later, the insurance company "reinterpreted" their policy and started reducing his payments anyway! He had to hire a lawyer to fight it. They eventually settled and restored most (but not all) of his benefits. What state are you in? That makes a huge difference for workers comp rules.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•This is an excellent point. Workers' Compensation laws vary significantly by state. In some states, the offset only applies to SSDI, while in others it applies to all Social Security benefits. Additionally, the language in the specific WC policy matters greatly. One strategy some people consider: If you're close to Full Retirement Age (66-67 depending on birth year), it might be worth waiting rather than taking early retirement at 62, since the WC benefits might be reduced either way. By waiting, you'd at least get a higher SS benefit when the WC eventually ends. Also, some WC settlements can be structured to minimize these offsets. This is why consulting with an attorney who specializes in both Workers' Comp and Social Security in your state is so important.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
Another CRITICAL thing to know - if your sister ever does decide to apply for SSDI (not just retirement), there's a 5 MONTH waiting period before benefits start AND Medicare doesn't kick in until 24 MONTHS after SSDI approval!!! The system is designed to make disabled workers SUFFER!!! And btw - if your sister's injury happened 8 years ago, has she even TRIED applying for SSDI? If her injury is permanent and prevented her from working, she might qualify for SSDI which could actually pay MORE than early retirement. The SSDI benefit is calculated as if she worked until full retirement age!
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•That's a really interesting point about SSDI potentially being higher than early retirement. She hasn't applied because we always assumed the WC offset would make it pointless, but maybe we should run the numbers and see if SSDI might actually be better in the long run, especially with the Medicare benefit. Thanks for that perspective!
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
After reviewing numerous cases like this in my work, here's the most accurate information I can provide: 1. The Worker's Compensation offset for Social Security benefits varies by state law and policy language. 2. In most states, there is a distinction between SSDI and retirement benefits in how they're treated for offset purposes, but approximately 15 states do allow offsets against retirement benefits. 3. The key factor is often when the injury occurred in relation to age. If the worker was disabled well before retirement age, some policies treat any Social Security as partially attributable to the disability. 4. The safest approach is to request a formal written determination from the WC carrier about how they would treat retirement benefits specifically. 5. There may be a maximum combined benefit amount specified in state law (often 80% of pre-injury wages). I recommend having your sister request her earnings record from Social Security to calculate potential retirement benefits, then discuss with both a WC attorney and a financial advisor to determine the optimal strategy.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Thank you for this detailed breakdown. I didn't realize there could be a maximum combined benefit amount based on pre-injury wages - that's really helpful information. I'll have my sister request her earnings record so we can start running some accurate calculations.
0 coins