Will new WEP/GPO reform let my CSRS husband get survivor benefits from me or his ex?
So confused about this possible WEP/GPO reform waiting for the President's signature! My situation is complicated and I need some clarity. My husband retired from federal service under CSRS, which currently means he wouldn't be eligible for any survivor benefits if I pass away before him due to the Government Pension Offset. I think the new legislation would change this and allow him to receive survivor benefits based on my work record, but I'm not 100% sure. There's also another wrinkle - he was previously married for over 10 years before our marriage, and he married me after he turned 60. If his ex-wife dies before me, would he be eligible to collect benefits on her record despite his CSRS pension? Would the new legislation affect this scenario differently? I've tried figuring this out on the SSA website but keep going in circles. Anyone familiar with how the proposed WEP/GPO changes might impact these scenarios?
17 comments


Jackson Carter
This is a great question with several moving parts. Under current GPO rules, your husband's CSRS pension would reduce any potential Social Security survivor benefits by 2/3 of his pension amount (often eliminating it completely). The proposed legislation would indeed modify this, potentially allowing him to receive more of your survivor benefits if you predecease him. Regarding his ex-wife: Yes, if she predeceases you, he could potentially claim ex-spouse survivor benefits based on her record since they were married 10+ years and he remarried after 60. However, these benefits would also currently be subject to GPO reduction. The new legislation would phase out these reductions over time rather than eliminate them immediately. I'd recommend consulting with a financial advisor who specializes in federal benefits once the legislation is actually signed, as the implementation timeline will affect your specific situation.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
•Thank you for such a thorough explanation! Do you know if there's any way to estimate how much he might receive after the GPO reduction is phased out? His CSRS pension is about $4,100/month, and I've paid into Social Security my entire career (30+ years).
0 coins
Kolton Murphy
my neighbor went thru something similar last year with WEP issues. the SSA office kept giving him wrong info everytime he called!!! took him 4 months to get it straightened out.
0 coins
Evelyn Rivera
•Same here! My husband is also CSRS and we spent 6 months going back and forth with SSA. Their own employees sometimes don't understand all the WEP/GPO rules. It's ridiculous how complicated they make everything!
0 coins
Julia Hall
I've been following the WEP/GPO reform closely since my husband is also under CSRS. The current version should phase out the GPO over several years, but DON'T COUNT ON IT YET! Congress has been trying to fix this for decades with no success. And from personal experience trying to reach SSA about complex situations like this is IMPOSSIBLE. Hours on hold only to be disconnected or talk to someone who gives you completely wrong information. I've been trying for WEEKS to get a straight answer about my own situation.
0 coins
Arjun Patel
•Have you tried using Claimyr? It got me through to a real SSA agent in about 20 minutes after I had spent weeks trying on my own. They have this system that waits on hold for you then calls when an agent is ready. Saved me so much frustration when dealing with my WEP recalculation. There's a demo video at https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU that shows how it works. Especially for complicated stuff like WEP/GPO, you really need to talk to someone knowledgeable at SSA.
0 coins
Jade Lopez
Just to clarify a few technical points: 1. If the legislation passes as currently written, the GPO reduction would be phased out over time - not immediately eliminated. This means your husband would gradually become eligible for more of your survivor benefits each year of the phase-out period. 2. Regarding his ex-spouse benefits: The timing matters significantly. If his ex-wife predeceases you AND if the legislation is signed, he could eventually receive full ex-spouse survivor benefits (assuming those would be higher than his survivor benefits from your record). 3. Important note: He can only receive one benefit - whichever is higher (your survivor benefit or his ex-wife's survivor benefit), not both simultaneously. 4. The CSRS pension itself doesn't change - he'll continue receiving that regardless. I recommend documenting both your earnings histories and potential benefit amounts now, so you're prepared to make decisions once the legislation details and implementation timeline are finalized.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
•Thank you so much for these details! So if I understand correctly, he wouldn't have to choose between his CSRS pension and survivor benefits - he would receive his pension plus a gradually increasing portion of either my survivor benefits or his ex-wife's (whichever is higher), depending on the phase-out schedule? That's much clearer than what I was understanding from the SSA website.
0 coins
Tony Brooks
My sister-in-law just went through this exact situation last year. Her husband was CSRS and they told her he wouldn't get ANY of her SS after she retired. It's so unfair - he paid in for years before going federal! The whole system is rigged against government workers. I hope they finally fix this broken system.
0 coins
Kolton Murphy
•yep the system is totally rigged! my dad worked 20 yrs for the post office and gets practically nothing from my mom's SS even tho she paid in 45 years!!! makes no sense.
0 coins
Jackson Carter
To address your latest question - yes, that's correct. Your husband would continue to receive his full CSRS pension. The GPO only affects how much Social Security he can receive based on YOUR record (or his ex-wife's). Currently, the GPO reduces his potential Social Security survivor benefits by 2/3 of his CSRS pension amount. If his pension is $4,100/month, that's a reduction of about $2,733. If your survivor benefit would be less than that reduction amount, he'd currently receive nothing from Social Security despite your 30+ years of contributions. With the proposed phase-out, that reduction would gradually decrease until eventually he could receive the full survivor benefit he's eligible for (while still keeping his entire CSRS pension). But please note: The final legislation details matter enormously here, particularly the phase-out timeline.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
•This makes so much sense now! I've been trying to understand this for months. The SSA website explanations are so technical that I couldn't figure out how the reduction actually works. Thank you for breaking it down so clearly. I'll wait to see the final legislation before making any plans, but this gives me hope that he'll eventually get some benefit from all my years of SS contributions.
0 coins
Arjun Patel
When you do get the final details on the legislation, make sure to get everything in writing from SSA about your specific situation. I've dealt with them for years and have learned the hard way that verbal information isn't reliable. Different agents give different answers. Keep notes with dates, names, and specifics of every conversation. It's saved me multiple times when they tried to backtrack on previous information.
0 coins
Jade Lopez
•This is excellent advice. I'll add that requesting a PEBES statement (Benefit Estimate) for both you and documenting your husband's exact CSRS pension amount will help create a paper trail. You should also consider filing a "Request for Social Security Statement" (Form SSA-7004) to get the most accurate information about your potential survivor benefits.
0 coins
Evelyn Rivera
Wait I'm confused - I thought the new WEP/GPO bill didn't pass?? Did I miss something? Last I heard they were still debating it??
0 coins
Jackson Carter
•The WEP/GPO reform was included in the recent tax package legislation that passed Congress and is now awaiting the President's signature - that's what the original poster is referring to. It hasn't been signed into law yet, but it has passed both the House and Senate as part of the larger bill. The provisions would gradually phase out the penalties rather than eliminate them immediately.
0 coins
Lilah Brooks
Thank you all for the helpful information! This community has explained things better than hours of reading confusing government websites. I'm cautiously optimistic about the legislation but will wait to see the final details before getting too excited. I'll gather our records as suggested and be prepared to speak with SSA once the changes are official. And I'll definitely check out Claimyr when it's time to call - sounds much better than spending days on hold!
0 coins