Will my domestic partner qualify for Social Security survivor benefits after 40+ years together?
Hi everyone, I need some advice about domestic partner survivor benefits with Social Security. My partner Maria and I have been together for over 40 years, but we never officially married. I'm 68 and started collecting my retirement benefits at my full retirement age, while Maria is 65 and has been on SSDI since she was 60 due to a chronic health condition. I'm worried about what happens to Maria if I pass away first. My monthly benefit is about $2,800 while hers is only around $1,250. Would she be eligible for any kind of survivor benefits based on my higher amount? We don't live in a common-law marriage state, but I recently read something about "putative spouse" rights where someone who believed in good faith they were in a marriage might have similar rights as legal spouses. Is there any way to "register" her with SSA as my life partner so she could receive survivor benefits? We've been each other's only partners for four decades, share finances completely, and she's my healthcare proxy. What documentation would we need? Has anyone navigated this successfully?
20 comments
Join the conversation
CosmicCaptain
Unfortunately Social Security is really strict on this. My brother was with his partner for 32 years and they weren't married, and when he died she couldn't get anything from his benefits. The SSA doesn't recognize domestic partnerships AT ALL for benefits!!!
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•That's heartbreaking to hear about your brother's partner. Did they explore any options at all? I've been reading conflicting information about whether the putative spouse concept might apply in some situations.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
This is a complex situation, but I'll try to provide accurate information. Social Security law generally doesn't recognize domestic partnerships for survivor benefits purposes. To qualify for survivor benefits, you typically need one of these relationships with the deceased: 1. You were legally married for at least 9 months before death 2. You were the parent of the deceased's child 3. You were in a valid common-law marriage according to your state's laws 4. You had a deemed valid marriage (similar to putative spouse concept) The "deemed valid marriage" might be what you're referring to. This applies when someone believed in good faith they were legally married when they weren't. However, this typically involves situations like an unknown impediment to a marriage ceremony (like one party's prior divorce wasn't finalized), not long-term domestic partnerships. Do you have any documentation showing you presented yourselves as married to the community or believed yourselves to be in a legal marriage?
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•Thank you for this detailed response. We've never presented ourselves as legally married - we've always been open about being domestic partners. We do have paperwork naming each other as beneficiaries on retirement accounts, life insurance, medical proxies, etc. We also have joint property deeds. But it sounds like that might not be enough for SSA purposes?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
My cousin went thru something like this! She n her partner were 2gether for like 35 yrs but never married and when he died the SS office wouldnt give her any survivors benefits. But isn't there something about if u live in a state that has common law? Mite be different in that case.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•You're right that common-law marriage can sometimes qualify for Social Security survivor benefits, but only if the state recognizes common-law marriages. Currently only 8 states plus DC fully recognize them (Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Montana, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Texas, Utah). A few others (like New Hampshire) recognize them for inheritance only. The OP mentioned they don't live in a common-law state, so unfortunately that route isn't available to them.
0 coins
Sofia Gutierrez
The system is SO BROKEN! 40+ years together and the government acts like your relationship means NOTHING! Meanwhile people can get married for 9 months and 1 day and qualify for full survivor benefits?! It's discriminatory and outdated. You two have likely built your retirement planning TOGETHER all these years, and now because you don't have a piece of paper, one of you could be left financially vulnerable. Makes me FURIOUS how the SSA refuses to evolve with modern families!!!
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•I appreciate your support. It does feel unfair given how long we've been together. We've built our entire adult lives as a couple, but it seems like that doesn't count in the eyes of Social Security.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
Have you considered getting married now? It's not too late! As long as you're married for 9 months before anything happens, your partner would qualify for survivor benefits. At your ages, it might be worth considering just for the financial protection.
0 coins
StarSurfer
•This is actually really good advice. My parents were together 50 years but never married until dad got sick. They finally got married and it turned out to be a blessing because mom qualified for his higher SS amount when he passed 2 years later. Sometimes you have to work within the system, even if it seems silly after 40 years together!
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
I've worked with clients in similar situations. The putative spouse concept you mentioned generally requires you to have gone through a marriage ceremony and believed you were legally married. Simply living together, even for decades, usually doesn't qualify. However, you do have options: 1. Marriage is the most straightforward solution. If you marry now and remain married for at least 9 months, your partner would qualify for survivor benefits. 2. If you have documentation showing you held yourselves out as married (filed taxes jointly, used the same last name, etc.), you might be able to establish a common-law marriage that SSA would recognize - but this is highly dependent on state laws. 3. In some very limited cases, SSA has recognized equitable relationships, but these are extremely rare and difficult to prove. I'd recommend scheduling an appointment with SSA to discuss your specific situation and options. Getting accurate information directly from them is crucial.
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•Thank you for these practical options. We don't file taxes jointly or share a last name - we've always been open about our status as domestic partners rather than spouses. I think marriage might be our only option at this point, though for various reasons we've chosen not to marry all these years. I'll try to schedule an appointment with SSA to get their official take.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
Getting an appt with SS is nearly impossible these days! My mom tried for WEEKS to get through on the phone. Always busy signals or disconnects after waiting forever. Super frustrating!!
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
•I had the same problem but then I found this service called Claimyr that got me through to a Social Security agent in about 20 minutes! It worked when I needed to sort out some issues with my widow's benefits. You can see how it works in their video here: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. Their website is claimyr.com - definitely worth it instead of wasting days trying to get through. They connect you directly to the SSA so you're still talking to actual Social Security representatives.
0 coins
StarSurfer
just marry her now problem solved
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•We've had our reasons for not marrying all these years, but you're right that it might be the simplest solution for Social Security purposes. It's frustrating that decades of commitment aren't recognized without that legal document.
0 coins
Sofia Gutierrez
The whole system is designed around traditional marriage and doesn't account for the MANY different types of committed relationships people have. I've been fighting this battle for YEARS with various government agencies. Even in states with domestic partnership registries, the federal government (including SSA) doesn't recognize them for benefit purposes. It's DISCRIMINATION, plain and simple!!!
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
•You're right that Social Security rules were designed around traditional marriage models. However, it's worth noting that these rules have evolved somewhat - particularly after the Obergefell decision legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. SSA now has policies to provide benefits in some cases where couples couldn't legally marry previously. But for opposite-sex couples who chose not to marry, the options remain limited under current law.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
My sister works for SSA and she says they get these questions all the time but their hands are tied by the law. Congress would need to change it to include domestic partners. Don't count on that happening anytime soon though...
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Your sister is correct. Social Security is bound by Title II of the Social Security Act, which specifically defines who qualifies as a spouse or surviving spouse. The agency doesn't have authority to expand these definitions without Congressional action. Some states have pushed for changes, but federal benefit programs still generally require legal marriage.
0 coins