< Back to Social Security Administration

Taking SS at 62 while husband waits until FRA - investing benefits but worried about downsides

I'm turning 62 next month and seriously considering taking my Social Security benefits early rather than waiting until my Full Retirement Age. I've done some calculations and surprisingly, the difference between what I'd get now versus at FRA isn't substantial in my case (only about $320 less per month if I take it early). My thought is to invest these monthly payments to potentially make up the difference over time. My situation: I've already retired from my nursing career, while my husband (63) is still working. He's definitely the higher earner in our marriage and plans to wait until his FRA to maximize his benefits. We're both in good health (him especially - still runs 5 miles daily), and I don't have any pressing need for the money right now. I understand the permanent reduction for claiming early, but are there other downsides I'm missing? Particularly concerned about: 1. How this might affect spousal benefits later? 2. Any earnings limit issues if I decide to do some part-time work? 3. Tax implications I might not be considering? Does my investment strategy make sense, or am I missing something obvious here? Thanks for any insights!

Ev Luca

•

Your investment strateGY sounds RISKY to me!! Remember SS is GUARANTEED income for life. When you take it early you're permanently reducing that guarantee! The SSA doesn't care if you invest it and lose it all in the stock market crash that's coming. Plus the government can change the rules anytime they want. My sister took her SS early and REGRETS it every single day!!

0 coins

Thanks for the concern, but I'm not planning on anything risky - mostly dividend stocks and some bonds. I'm more wondering about technical downsides like how this affects spousal benefits or tax situations rather than the investment piece. Has your sister mentioned any specific administrative issues she encountered?

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

This is actually a common strategy, and you've identified most of the key considerations. Here are a few things to think about: 1. Spousal benefits: If your husband's benefit is substantially higher, you'd eventually be eligible for up to 50% of his FRA benefit as a spouse. The catch is that if you file early for your own benefits, your spousal benefit will also be reduced, even if you claim it later. 2. Earnings test: If you work before your FRA, you'll be subject to the earnings limit ($23,300 in 2025 for those under FRA the whole year). $1 in benefits is withheld for every $2 earned above that limit. This might impact your investment strategy if you plan to work part-time. 3. Survivor benefits: If your husband passes away first, you'd be eligible for survivor benefits. If you've taken your own benefits early, this doesn't affect survivor benefits - you'd get his full amount if he waited until FRA. 4. Taxation: Up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxable depending on your combined income. Your strategy of investing might create additional taxable income that could make more of your SS benefits taxable. Have you run calculations on the break-even point - at what age the higher FRA amount would outweigh the extra years of early benefits plus investment returns?

0 coins

This is super helpful! I actually hadn't considered the survivor benefit aspect at all - good to know my early filing doesn't impact that. I ran a rough break-even calculation and found it was around age 79-80 assuming modest investment returns, but I didn't factor in the tax implications. I definitely need to think more about that part. Do you know if taking benefits early affects Medicare premiums later?

0 coins

Collins Angel

•

Taking SS at 62 can be a smart move depending on your full financial picture! I was in a similar spot - decided to take mine at 62 last year while my wife waited. One thing nobody mentioned yet - have you checked if you're eligible for any spousal benefits NOW before filing for your own? Sometimes that can be a better option. Also, when I tried calling SSA to discuss all this, it was IMPOSSIBLE to get through! After 3 weeks of trying, I found this service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to a real person at SSA in under 15 minutes. They have a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. Totally worth it since I had specific questions about how my pension affected my benefits (WEP rules are so confusing). The SSA rep actually found me eligible for more than I thought! Anyway, everyone's situation is different, but I don't regret taking mine early at all.

0 coins

Marcelle Drum

•

has anybody else used this claimyr thing? seems sketchy to me but im desperate. been trying to get someone on the phone for MONTHS about my widow benefits

0 coins

Tate Jensen

•

your probably makeing a big mistake. my mother took her SS at 62 and now she can barely survive. inflation is getting worse every year and that smaller check will seem even smaller in a few years. do you really want to struggle in your 80s just to have a little extra in your 60s???? think long term!!

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

While I understand your concern, each situation is different. If someone has other significant retirement income sources and is primarily taking SS early for strategic reasons (like investing), it can work out well. The key is having a comprehensive retirement income plan that accounts for inflation - Social Security includes cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) which do help counter inflation effects. The most important thing is making an informed decision based on their specific financial situation.

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

I think your plan is reasonable based on what you've shared. One technical detail others haven't mentioned: taking your benefit early doesn't just affect the amount - it can also impact your husband's claiming strategy. If you file for your own benefits, your husband cannot file a restricted application for spousal benefits only while letting his own benefit grow (though this only applies if he was born before 1954, which it sounds like he's not). I actually ran some calculations for my own situation that might help you. With average 6% investment returns and accounting for taxes, my break-even age was 81. Since women statistically live longer than men, waiting is often mathematically optimal, but there are psychological benefits to having the money earlier that calculations don't capture. One approach worth considering: Take your benefits at 62, invest as planned, but if/when your husband claims his benefits and you become eligible for spousal, you might be able to step up to a higher amount (depending on the difference between your PIAs).

0 coins

Thank you for sharing your calculations! The 81 break-even is pretty close to what I estimated. You're right about the restricted application not applying - my husband was born in 1962. I'm curious about your comment regarding stepping up to a higher spousal amount later - I thought if I take my own benefits early, that permanently reduces any spousal benefit I might receive when my husband files. Is that not correct?

0 coins

Gabriel Ruiz

•

my aunt did this exact thing ur talking about. she took ss at 62 and invested in some dividend stocks. made ok money for couple years then the company cut the dividend and stock went down. now she wishes she just waited for the bigger check. just saying dont count on investmants working out perfect

0 coins

Marcelle Drum

•

this happened to my neighbor too!! those fancy financial advisors make everything sound so easy but real life is different. sorry about your aunt

0 coins

Adaline Wong

•

To answer your follow-up question about stepping up to spousal benefits: You're partly right. When you eventually qualify for spousal benefits (when your husband files), you'll receive your own reduced benefit plus the difference to bring you up to the maximum spousal amount (which is reduced because you filed early). Specifically, when your husband files, SSA will calculate your spousal benefit as the higher of: 1. Your own benefit amount, or 2. Up to 50% of your husband's PIA (reduced if you claimed before your FRA) So yes, filing early permanently reduces both benefits, but you'll still get the higher of the two when your husband files. For some people with significantly different earnings records, this can still result in a noticeable increase even with the early filing reduction.

0 coins

That makes so much more sense now - thank you for explaining! So I'll still get a bump when my husband files, just not as much as if I had waited. That's another factor in favor of filing early in my case.

0 coins

Marcelle Drum

•

I took my SS early and regret it every month when i see that smaller check! But my situation was different i didnt have any other savings. One thing nobodys mentioned - if you claim early and then change your mind you can withdraw your application within 12 months of filing. You gotta pay back all the benefits but it gives you a do-over if your investment plan doesnt work out.

0 coins

Collins Angel

•

That's a great point about the 12-month window! I actually considered doing this myself, but decided to stick with my early claiming decision. There's also another option after FRA called "suspension" where you can stop benefits and earn delayed retirement credits, though you can't do this until you reach your full retirement age. It's like a partial do-over that doesn't require paying anything back.

0 coins

Ev Luca

•

NONE of you are mentioning the MASSIVE changes coming to Social Security!!!! The trust fund is going to be DEPLETED by 2034 and then what????? Taking it early might be the ONLY way to get anything before they change all the rules and CUT BENEFITS for everyone!!! Wake UP people!!!!

0 coins

Avery Davis

•

I understand the concern, but it's important to clarify that even if the trust fund is depleted, Social Security would still pay about 78-80% of promised benefits from ongoing payroll taxes. Congress has always acted before major benefit cuts occurred in the past, and there are many reform proposals being discussed. While the system certainly faces challenges, making claiming decisions based on fear of complete program collapse is generally not recommended by financial planning experts.

0 coins

Collins Angel

•

@original poster - did you ever get this resolved? I'm curious what you decided to do since I'm facing a similar decision next year. My financial advisor actually suggested the same strategy you're considering.

0 coins

Yes! After weighing everyone's input and meeting with my financial advisor, I decided to go ahead with taking benefits at 62. The key factors in my decision were: 1) the relatively small difference between early and FRA benefits in my specific case, 2) learning that survivor benefits wouldn't be affected if my husband waits until his FRA, and 3) realizing I'd still get a partial spousal bump when my husband files even though I took my own benefits early. I'll be filing next month when I turn 62! Fingers crossed it works out.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
7,095 users helped today