< Back to Social Security Administration

Social Security spousal benefits after WEP repeal - retired teacher confused about eligibility

My mother-in-law is so confused about her Social Security options after this WEP repeal, and honestly, so am I! She retired from teaching in Colorado after 32 years and receives her teacher's pension (about $3,750/month). Her husband (my father-in-law) is collecting Social Security benefits from his career as an electrical engineer. They're both 72 years old now. With all this talk about the WEP being repealed, does this mean she can now apply for spousal benefits based on his work record? Or is that completely different and only applies when he passes away? She's getting conflicting advice from friends who are also retired teachers, and I promised I'd try to find a clear answer. Does anyone know how the spousal benefit works in this situation?

Aisha Patel

•

The WEP and GPO are different things even though people mix them up all the time! WEP affects your OWN benefits if you have a pension from non-covered employment. GPO affects SPOUSAL benefits if you have a pension from non-covered employment. So your question is actually about the GPO (Government Pension Offset), not the WEP. And as far as I know, the GPO has NOT been repealed yet, just some bills proposed. So she probably still can't get spousal benefits while he's alive. After he passes, she'd get survivor benefits but they'd be reduced by 2/3 of her pension.

0 coins

Klaus Schmidt

•

Thank you for clearing that up! So it's GPO not WEP that affects her situation. That's probably why she's getting such confusing advice. Do you know if there's any movement on repealing the GPO as well? Or are they completely separate issues?

0 coins

LilMama23

•

The previous poster is correct. Your mother-in-law's situation falls under the Government Pension Offset (GPO), not the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP). These are two different policies that affect government pensioners in different ways. The GPO reduces spousal/survivor benefits for those receiving government pensions from non-Social Security covered employment. Currently, the GPO would reduce any potential spousal benefit by 2/3 of her teacher's pension amount. Since her pension is $3,750/month, 2/3 of that would be $2,500. If the maximum spousal benefit she could receive (50% of her husband's benefit) is less than $2,500, then she would receive $0 in spousal benefits. There are bills in Congress to reform or repeal both WEP and GPO, but nothing has passed yet for either provision. I recommend she contact her local Social Security office to get an official determination of her eligibility for any spousal benefits, as there can be specific exceptions or rules based on when she earned her pension.

0 coins

Dmitri Volkov

•

This is exactly why the system is so messed up! My cousin taught for 30 years and gets ZERO spousal benefits even though her husband paid into SS his whole life. How is that fair??? Teachers already get paid so little and then they get punished in retirement. It's disgusting!

0 coins

I went through something similar with my wife who was a teacher in Texas. The WEP and GPO are different provisions, and it sounds like your mother-in-law is affected by GPO rather than WEP. Currently, under GPO, your mother-in-law's potential spousal benefit would be reduced by 2/3 of her teacher's pension. So if her pension is $3,750/month, then her spousal benefit would be reduced by $2,500. If your father-in-law's Social Security benefit is $3,000/month, her spousal benefit would ordinarily be $1,500 (50%), but after the GPO reduction, she would receive $0 because the reduction is greater than the potential benefit. However, I would still encourage her to apply with Social Security. Some teacher pensions have specific provisions or exceptions, and only SSA can make the final determination based on her specific situation.

0 coins

Klaus Schmidt

•

Thank you so much for explaining this! We'll definitely have her apply just to be sure. One more question though - if my father-in-law passes away, would she be eligible for survivor benefits at that point? How does the GPO affect that calculation?

0 coins

Regarding survivor benefits: Yes, she would potentially be eligible for survivor benefits if your father-in-law passes away. Survivor benefits are typically 100% of what the deceased spouse was receiving (rather than 50% for spousal benefits). The GPO would still apply, meaning her survivor benefit would be reduced by 2/3 of her pension amount. But since survivor benefits are higher than spousal benefits, she might receive some money even after the GPO reduction. For example, if your father-in-law receives $3,000/month from Social Security, her potential survivor benefit would be $3,000. After subtracting the GPO reduction of $2,500 (2/3 of her $3,750 pension), she could receive around $500/month in survivor benefits. But again, these are just estimates. The actual calculations can be complex, and there may be other factors involved.

0 coins

Tyrone Johnson

•

my wife was a teacher for 41 years and when I die she'll get almost nothing because of this stupid rule! both of us working our entire lives and she gets punished because she chose to teach kids. makes me so mad!!!

0 coins

Ingrid Larsson

•

Has your mother-in-law tried calling SSA directly? I spent WEEKS trying to get through to someone who could answer my GPO questions. Kept getting disconnected or waiting for hours. Finally used a service called Claimyr (claimyr.com) that got me connected to an agent in under 10 minutes. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU The SSA rep was actually really helpful once I got through and explained exactly how the GPO would impact my benefits. They can look at her specific work history and tell her if any exceptions apply. Some teaching jobs actually DO pay into Social Security depending on the state and timeframe.

0 coins

Klaus Schmidt

•

No, she hasn't tried calling yet. She's been dreading it because a friend told her she waited on hold for 3 hours and then got disconnected! I'll definitely check out that service - anything to avoid the hold time would be worth it. Thanks for the tip!

0 coins

Carlos Mendoza

•

I'm also a retired teacher (Maine) married to someone getting SS. The GPO is still in effect and probably will be for the foreseeable future despite all the talk. Here's what helped me: go to socialsecurity.gov, create an account if she doesn't have one, and run the benefit calculator. It will tell her EXACTLY what she might get as a spouse. Don't count on getting anything though - with her pension amount, the 2/3 offset will probably eliminate any spousal benefit entirely. But survivor benefits later might still give her something. The whole GPO/WEP situation is incredibly frustrating for those of us who dedicated our careers to public service!!

0 coins

Klaus Schmidt

•

Thank you for the suggestion about the benefit calculator. I'll help her set up an account this weekend. And yes, it does seem incredibly unfair that teachers are essentially penalized for their career choice. I appreciate everyone's helpful responses!

0 coins

Aisha Patel

•

I believe Colorado is one of the states where teachers DON'T pay into Social Security, which is why the GPO applies to her. In some states, teachers DO pay into both systems. Anyway, definitely have her apply regardless! My aunt was in almost the identical situation (teacher in Illinois) and she assumed she wouldn't get anything because of GPO. But it turned out part of her teaching career was actually covered employment because she worked in a different state early in her career where they DID pay into SS. She ended up qualifying for a small amount of spousal benefits! The SSA systems are complicated and even their own agents sometimes miss things. Always apply and get the official determination.

0 coins

Dmitri Volkov

•

this is so true!! my brother worked as a janitor at a school for 10 years before becoming a teacher and those years counted differently for the GPO calculation. the rules are so confusing even the SSA people mess it up sometimes.

0 coins

TaxRefund AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
6,869 users helped today